@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ ERROR_QA ?= "dev-so debug-deps dev-deps debug-files arch pkgconfig la \
# Add usrmerge QA check based on distro feature
ERROR_QA:append = "${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'usrmerge', ' usrmerge', '', d)}"
ERROR_QA:append:layer-core = " patch-status"
+WARN_QA:append:layer-core = " missing-metadata"
FAKEROOT_QA = "host-user-contaminated"
FAKEROOT_QA[doc] = "QA tests which need to run under fakeroot. If any \
@@ -1470,6 +1471,21 @@ python do_qa_unpack() {
}
python do_recipe_qa() {
+ def test_missing_metadata(d):
+ fn = d.getVar("FILE")
+ pn = d.getVar('BPN')
+ srcfile = d.getVar('SRC_URI').split()
+ # Check that SUMMARY is not the same as the default from bitbake.conf
+ if d.getVar('SUMMARY') == d.expand("${PN} version ${PV}-${PR}"):
+ oe.qa.handle_error("missing-metadata", "Recipe {} in {} does not contain a SUMMARY. Please add an entry.".format(pn, fn), d)
+ if not d.getVar('HOMEPAGE'):
+ if srcfile and srcfile[0].startswith('file') or not d.getVar('SRC_URI'):
+ # We are only interested in recipes SRC_URI fetched from external sources
+ pass
+ else:
+ oe.qa.handle_error("missing-metadata", "Recipe {} in {} does not contain a HOMEPAGE. Please add an entry.".format(pn, fn), d)
+
+ test_missing_metadata(d)
oe.qa.exit_if_errors(d)
}
@@ -39,42 +39,6 @@ but their recipes claim otherwise by setting UPSTREAM_VERSION_UNKNOWN. Please re
""" + "\n".join(regressed_successes)
self.assertTrue(len(regressed_failures) == 0 and len(regressed_successes) == 0, msg)
- def test_missing_homepg(self):
- """
- Summary: Test for oe-core recipes that don't have a HOMEPAGE or DESCRIPTION
- Expected: All oe-core recipes should have a DESCRIPTION entry
- Expected: All oe-core recipes should have a HOMEPAGE entry except for recipes that are not fetched from external sources.
- Product: oe-core
- """
- with bb.tinfoil.Tinfoil() as tinfoil:
- tinfoil.prepare(config_only=False)
- no_description = []
- no_homepage = []
- for fn in tinfoil.all_recipe_files(variants=False):
- if not '/meta/recipes-' in fn:
- # We are only interested in OE-Core
- continue
- rd = tinfoil.parse_recipe_file(fn, appends=False)
- pn = rd.getVar('BPN')
- srcfile = rd.getVar('SRC_URI').split()
- #Since DESCRIPTION defaults to SUMMARY if not set, we are only interested in recipes without DESCRIPTION or SUMMARY
- if not (rd.getVar('SUMMARY') or rd.getVar('DESCRIPTION')):
- no_description.append((pn, fn))
- if not rd.getVar('HOMEPAGE'):
- if srcfile and srcfile[0].startswith('file') or not rd.getVar('SRC_URI'):
- # We are only interested in recipes SRC_URI fetched from external sources
- continue
- no_homepage.append((pn, fn))
- if no_homepage:
- self.fail("""
-The following recipes do not have a HOMEPAGE. Please add an entry for HOMEPAGE in the recipe.
-""" + "\n".join(['%s (%s)' % i for i in no_homepage]))
-
- if no_description:
- self.fail("""
-The following recipes do not have a DESCRIPTION. Please add an entry for DESCRIPTION in the recipe.
-""" + "\n".join(['%s (%s)' % i for i in no_description]))
-
def test_maintainers(self):
"""
Summary: Test that oe-core recipes have a maintainer and entries in maintainers list have a recipe
This was done in a selftest, but that is too late and creates friction in integration as errors are not seen until autobuilder fails. Bonus fix: SUMMARY check wasn't even working, as in the absence of one set in the recipe there is a default value set from bitbake.conf. I left DESCRIPTION check out for now, as many recipes don't actually have it, and it's set from SUMMARY (plus a dot) if absent. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex@linutronix.de> --- meta/classes-global/insane.bbclass | 16 ++++++++++ meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py | 36 ---------------------- 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)