glibc: Update patch status

These patches were appplied in master

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
---
 .../0026-x86-Fix-define-STRCPY-guard-in-strcpy-sse2.S.patch     | 2 +-
 .../0027-elf-Replace-strcpy-call-with-memcpy-BZ-29454.patch     | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

The 2nd more important part was backported to 2.36 branch
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=302bc33bc53c787da6e74162a7092e9c0fb964a8

If you plan to do another SRCREV bump before glibc upgrade is merged, then
we can drop these 2 changes. (I'll try to do another build tests with
DEBUG_BUILD, but probably next week or so).

On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 4:50 PM Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:

> These patches were appplied in master
>
> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
> ---
>  .../0026-x86-Fix-define-STRCPY-guard-in-strcpy-sse2.S.patch     | 2 +-
>  .../0027-elf-Replace-strcpy-call-with-memcpy-BZ-29454.patch     | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
> a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0026-x86-Fix-define-STRCPY-guard-in-strcpy-sse2.S.patch
> b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0026-x86-Fix-define-STRCPY-guard-in-strcpy-sse2.S.patch
> index 2d14a4c6196..2caff3a0d53 100644
> ---
> a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0026-x86-Fix-define-STRCPY-guard-in-strcpy-sse2.S.patch
> +++
> b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0026-x86-Fix-define-STRCPY-guard-in-strcpy-sse2.S.patch
> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Subject: [PATCH] x86: Fix `#define STRCPY` guard in
> strcpy-sse2.S
>  defined.  It doesn't end up mattering as the whole check is
>  guarded by `#if IS_IN (libc)` but is incorrect none the less.
>
> -Upstream-Status: Submitted [
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29454
> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2022-August/141289.html]
> +Upstream-Status: Backport [
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=312ded0d6339e8c463d0395397b5825401b14f54
> ]
>  Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
>  ---
>   sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/strcpy-sse2.S | 2 +-
> diff --git
> a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0027-elf-Replace-strcpy-call-with-memcpy-BZ-29454.patch
> b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0027-elf-Replace-strcpy-call-with-memcpy-BZ-29454.patch
> index 1b347b33226..a2c951ad936 100644
> ---
> a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0027-elf-Replace-strcpy-call-with-memcpy-BZ-29454.patch
> +++
> b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0027-elf-Replace-strcpy-call-with-memcpy-BZ-29454.patch
> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ strlen_pass::handle_builtin_strcpy but only for optimized
>  build. To avoid needing to include strcpy.S in the rtld build to
>  support the debug build, just do the optimization by hand.
>
> -Upstream-Status: Submitted [
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29454
> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2022-August/141290.html]
> +Upstream-Status: Backport [
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=483cfe1a6a33d6335b1901581b41040d2d412511
> ]
>  Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
>  ---
>   elf/dl-cache.c | 5 +++--
> --
> 2.37.1
>
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> View/Reply Online (#169155):
> https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/169155
> Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/92916378/3617156
> Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [
> Martin.Jansa@gmail.com]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>

On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 9:21 AM Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The 2nd more important part was backported to 2.36 branch https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=302bc33bc53c787da6e74162a7092e9c0fb964a8
>
> If you plan to do another SRCREV bump before glibc upgrade is merged, then we can drop these 2 changes. (I'll try to do another build tests with DEBUG_BUILD, but probably next week or so).

I think, I might do, if Alex reports issues as he is already testing it out.

>
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 4:50 PM Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> These patches were appplied in master
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  .../0026-x86-Fix-define-STRCPY-guard-in-strcpy-sse2.S.patch     | 2 +-
>>  .../0027-elf-Replace-strcpy-call-with-memcpy-BZ-29454.patch     | 2 +-
>>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0026-x86-Fix-define-STRCPY-guard-in-strcpy-sse2.S.patch b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0026-x86-Fix-define-STRCPY-guard-in-strcpy-sse2.S.patch
>> index 2d14a4c6196..2caff3a0d53 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0026-x86-Fix-define-STRCPY-guard-in-strcpy-sse2.S.patch
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0026-x86-Fix-define-STRCPY-guard-in-strcpy-sse2.S.patch
>> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Subject: [PATCH] x86: Fix `#define STRCPY` guard in strcpy-sse2.S
>>  defined.  It doesn't end up mattering as the whole check is
>>  guarded by `#if IS_IN (libc)` but is incorrect none the less.
>>
>> -Upstream-Status: Submitted [https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29454 https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2022-August/141289.html]
>> +Upstream-Status: Backport [https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=312ded0d6339e8c463d0395397b5825401b14f54]
>>  Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
>>  ---
>>   sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/strcpy-sse2.S | 2 +-
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0027-elf-Replace-strcpy-call-with-memcpy-BZ-29454.patch b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0027-elf-Replace-strcpy-call-with-memcpy-BZ-29454.patch
>> index 1b347b33226..a2c951ad936 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0027-elf-Replace-strcpy-call-with-memcpy-BZ-29454.patch
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0027-elf-Replace-strcpy-call-with-memcpy-BZ-29454.patch
>> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ strlen_pass::handle_builtin_strcpy but only for optimized
>>  build. To avoid needing to include strcpy.S in the rtld build to
>>  support the debug build, just do the optimization by hand.
>>
>> -Upstream-Status: Submitted [https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29454 https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2022-August/141290.html]
>> +Upstream-Status: Backport [https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=483cfe1a6a33d6335b1901581b41040d2d412511]
>>  Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
>>  ---
>>   elf/dl-cache.c | 5 +++--
>> --
>> 2.37.1
>>
>>
>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
>> View/Reply Online (#169155): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/169155
>> Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/92916378/3617156
>> Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [Martin.Jansa@gmail.com]
>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>