Message ID | 0101018a9a36c5d5-dcf81a91-7709-4c49-933d-29b6888c00ba-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [AUH] alsa-lib: upgrading to 1.2.10 FAILED | expand |
Greetings, On 15.09.23 at 20:59, Auto Upgrade Helper wrote: > Hello, > > this email is a notification from the Auto Upgrade Helper > that the automatic attempt to upgrade the recipe *alsa-lib* to *1.2.10* has Failed(do_compile). > > Detailed error information: > > do_compile failed > Ouch, as far as I am concerned, the AUH patch didn't cause any failure on Poky "master". After applying a fix to the alsa-utils 2.10 recipe, I could also build this recipe depending on alsa-lib 1.2.10 and check that "speaker-test" starts. Any advice for cases when you can't reproduce the AUH failures? Thanks in advance Michael.
On Mon, 18 Sept 2023 at 18:28, Michael Opdenacker via lists.openembedded.org <michael.opdenacker=bootlin.com@lists.openembedded.org> wrote: > > this email is a notification from the Auto Upgrade Helper > > that the automatic attempt to upgrade the recipe *alsa-lib* to *1.2.10* has Failed(do_compile). > > > > Detailed error information: > > > > do_compile failed > > > Ouch, as far as I am concerned, the AUH patch didn't cause any failure > on Poky "master". > After applying a fix to the alsa-utils 2.10 recipe, I could also build > this recipe depending on alsa-lib 1.2.10 and check that "speaker-test" > starts. > > Any advice for cases when you can't reproduce the AUH failures? The failure is with musl, and I easily reproduced it there. The main report itself isn't saying it, but attached log file name should indicate the failing configuration. Alex
On 18.09.23 at 19:16, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On Mon, 18 Sept 2023 at 18:28, Michael Opdenacker via > lists.openembedded.org > <michael.opdenacker=bootlin.com@lists.openembedded.org> wrote: >>> this email is a notification from the Auto Upgrade Helper >>> that the automatic attempt to upgrade the recipe *alsa-lib* to *1.2.10* has Failed(do_compile). >>> >>> Detailed error information: >>> >>> do_compile failed >>> >> Ouch, as far as I am concerned, the AUH patch didn't cause any failure >> on Poky "master". >> After applying a fix to the alsa-utils 2.10 recipe, I could also build >> this recipe depending on alsa-lib 1.2.10 and check that "speaker-test" >> starts. >> >> Any advice for cases when you can't reproduce the AUH failures? > The failure is with musl, and I easily reproduced it there. The main > report itself isn't saying it, but attached log file name should > indicate the failing configuration. Ah, right, I should have paid attention to the file name. I could reproduce it too. Thanks a lot Alex :) Michael.
On Mon, 18 Sept 2023 at 20:46, Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com> wrote: > Ah, right, I should have paid attention to the file name. > I could reproduce it too. > > Thanks a lot Alex :) > Michael. I think this backport should help: https://github.com/alsa-project/alsa-lib/commit/10bd599970acc71c92f85eb08943eb8d3d702a9c Alex
Hi Alex On 18.09.23 at 21:13, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On Mon, 18 Sept 2023 at 20:46, Michael Opdenacker > <michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com> wrote: >> Ah, right, I should have paid attention to the file name. >> I could reproduce it too. >> >> Thanks a lot Alex :) >> Michael. > I think this backport should help: > https://github.com/alsa-project/alsa-lib/commit/10bd599970acc71c92f85eb08943eb8d3d702a9c Good catch. Indeed this fixes the issue. I'll send a patch shortly. Many thanks! Michael.
diff --git a/meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-lib_1.2.9.bb b/meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-lib_1.2.10.bb similarity index 94% rename from meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-lib_1.2.9.bb rename to meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-lib_1.2.10.bb index d482e27683..2722a38dd2 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-lib_1.2.9.bb +++ b/meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-lib_1.2.10.bb @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=a916467b91076e631dd8edb7424769c7 \ " SRC_URI = "https://www.alsa-project.org/files/pub/lib/${BP}.tar.bz2" -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "dc9c643fdc4ccfd0572cc685858dd41e08afb583f30460b317e4188275f615b2" +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "c86a45a846331b1b0aa6e6be100be2a7aef92efd405cf6bac7eef8174baa920e" inherit autotools pkgconfig
Hello, this email is a notification from the Auto Upgrade Helper that the automatic attempt to upgrade the recipe *alsa-lib* to *1.2.10* has Failed(do_compile). Detailed error information: do_compile failed Next steps: - apply the patch: git am 0001-alsa-lib-upgrade-1.2.9-1.2.10.patch - check the changes to upstream patches and summarize them in the commit message, - compile an image that contains the package - perform some basic sanity tests - amend the patch and sign it off: git commit -s --reset-author --amend - send it to the appropriate mailing list Alternatively, if you believe the recipe should not be upgraded at this time, you can fill RECIPE_NO_UPDATE_REASON in respective recipe file so that automatic upgrades would no longer be attempted. Please review the attached files for further information and build/update failures. Any problem please file a bug at https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Automated%20Update%20Handler Regards, The Upgrade Helper -- >8 -- From 59fe7771c04ba1bb89e4492c01f93e194bc290de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Upgrade Helper <auh@yoctoproject.org> Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 16:55:32 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] alsa-lib: upgrade 1.2.9 -> 1.2.10 --- .../alsa/{alsa-lib_1.2.9.bb => alsa-lib_1.2.10.bb} | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) rename meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/{alsa-lib_1.2.9.bb => alsa-lib_1.2.10.bb} (94%)