@@ -2506,11 +2506,14 @@ class RunQueueExecute:
if update_tasks:
self.sqdone = False
- for tid in [t[0] for t in update_tasks]:
- h = pending_hash_index(tid, self.rqdata)
- if h in self.sqdata.hashes and tid != self.sqdata.hashes[h]:
- self.sq_deferred[tid] = self.sqdata.hashes[h]
- bb.note("Deferring %s after %s" % (tid, self.sqdata.hashes[h]))
+ for mc in sorted(sqdata.multiconfigs):
+ for tid in sorted([t[0] for t in update_tasks]):
+ if mc_from_tid(tid) != mc:
+ continue
+ h = pending_hash_index(tid, self.rqdata)
+ if h in self.sqdata.hashes and tid != self.sqdata.hashes[h]:
+ self.sq_deferred[tid] = self.sqdata.hashes[h]
+ bb.note("Deferring %s after %s" % (tid, self.sqdata.hashes[h]))
update_scenequeue_data([t[0] for t in update_tasks], self.sqdata, self.rqdata, self.rq, self.cooker, self.stampcache, self, summary=False)
for (tid, harddepfail, origvalid) in update_tasks:
We have to prefer one multiconfig over another when deferring tasks, else we'll have cross-linked build trees and nothing will be able to build. In the original population code, we sort like this but we don't after rehashing. Ensure we have the same sorting after rehashing toa void deadlocks. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> --- lib/bb/runqueue.py | 13 ++++++++----- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)