[meta-fsl-arm,3/4] linux-fslc (3.14): Update to 4202f3c revision

Submitted by Otavio Salvador on July 7, 2014, 1:22 p.m.

Details

Message ID 1404739331-8135-4-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br
State Accepted, archived
Delegated to: Otavio Salvador
Headers show

Commit Message

Otavio Salvador July 7, 2014, 1:22 p.m.
This updates the 3.14-based kernel to the 3.14.9 release.

Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
---
 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc_3.14.bb | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Patch hide | download patch | download mbox

diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc_3.14.bb b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc_3.14.bb
index fb41d2d..d2a4fd4 100644
--- a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc_3.14.bb
+++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc_3.14.bb
@@ -12,6 +12,6 @@  include linux-fslc.inc
 PV = "3.14+git${SRCPV}"
 
 SRCBRANCH = "patches-3.14"
-SRCREV = "c34636a55713cace69f1f753f30da3d63fbf72ad"
+SRCREV = "4202f3c53a02bd79417e10cf3592d4d9517f110f"
 
 COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(mxs|mx3|mx5|mx6)"

Comments

Fabio Estevam July 7, 2014, 2:05 p.m.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Otavio Salvador
<otavio@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
> This updates the 3.14-based kernel to the 3.14.9 release.

Why not 3.14.11 instead?


And what about upgrading master to 3.15.4?
Eric BENARD July 7, 2014, 2:18 p.m.
Hi Fabio,

Le Mon, 7 Jul 2014 11:05:31 -0300,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> a écrit :

> 
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Otavio Salvador
> <otavio@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
> > This updates the 3.14-based kernel to the 3.14.9 release.
> 
> Why not 3.14.11 instead?
> 
> 
> And what about upgrading master to 3.15.4?

3.14.x would be interesting to keep as it's a long term version (up to
August 2016).

Best regards,
Eric
Otavio Salvador July 7, 2014, 3:13 p.m.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Otavio Salvador
> <otavio@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
>> This updates the 3.14-based kernel to the 3.14.9 release.
>
> Why not 3.14.11 instead?

Will do.

> And what about upgrading master to 3.15.4?

I pondered about it. I am not sure it'd be good or not to go for now.
I'd be more intended to go to 3.16 and target this one for 1.7.
Daiane Angolini July 8, 2014, 11:35 a.m.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Otavio Salvador
<otavio@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Otavio Salvador
>> <otavio@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
>>> This updates the 3.14-based kernel to the 3.14.9 release.
>>
>> Why not 3.14.11 instead?
>
> Will do.
>
>> And what about upgrading master to 3.15.4?
>
> I pondered about it. I am not sure it'd be good or not to go for now.
> I'd be more intended to go to 3.16 and target this one for 1.7.

I´m Ok with any

I review the patch when you send v2

Daiane