[2/2] gawk: remove dgawk and pgawk packages, merge gawk-common into gawk

Submitted by Ross Burton on June 6, 2014, 3:48 p.m.

Details

Message ID 1402069681-17929-2-git-send-email-ross.burton@intel.com
State Accepted
Commit 20f749de439aa962f32a3f4f5977fd44c9e76e33
Headers show

Commit Message

Ross Burton June 6, 2014, 3:48 p.m.
The dgawk and pgawk commands no longer exist in gawk 4.1 onwards, replaced by
options to gawk.

Remove the dgawk and pgawk binary packages, and merge gawk-common into gawk as
it is needless splitting.

Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
---
 meta/recipes-extended/gawk/gawk_4.1.1.bb |   10 +---------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)

Patch hide | download patch | download mbox

diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/gawk/gawk_4.1.1.bb b/meta/recipes-extended/gawk/gawk_4.1.1.bb
index b990ce9..a81be31 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-extended/gawk/gawk_4.1.1.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-extended/gawk/gawk_4.1.1.bb
@@ -13,9 +13,6 @@  LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=d32239bcb673463ab874e80d47fae504"
 
 DEPENDS += "readline"
 
-RDEPENDS_gawk += "gawk-common"
-RDEPENDS_pgawk += "gawk-common"
-
 SRC_URI = "${GNU_MIRROR}/gawk/gawk-${PV}.tar.gz \
            file://run-ptest \
 "
@@ -25,14 +22,9 @@  SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "556464bd2e4bc5a0fad4526b59623e4be40b4c2f4c663dfaaf246af6e2
 
 inherit autotools gettext texinfo update-alternatives
 
-PACKAGES += "gawk-common pgawk dgawk"
-
-FILES_${PN} = "${bindir}/gawk* ${bindir}/igawk"
-FILES_gawk-common += "${datadir}/awk/* ${libexecdir}/awk/* ${libdir}/${BPN}/*.so"
-FILES_pgawk = "${bindir}/pgawk*"
+FILES_${PN} += "${datadir}/awk"
 FILES_${PN}-dev += "${libdir}/${BPN}/*.la"
 FILES_${PN}-dbg += "${libexecdir}/awk/.debug"
-FILES_dgawk = "${bindir}/dgawk*"
 
 ALTERNATIVE_${PN} = "awk"
 ALTERNATIVE_TARGET[awk] = "${bindir}/gawk"

Comments

Khem Raj June 7, 2014, 10:50 a.m.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote:
> -PACKAGES += "gawk-common pgawk dgawk"

would it make sense to have RPROVIDES
Ross Burton June 9, 2014, 10:50 a.m.
On 7 June 2014 11:50, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote:
>> -PACKAGES += "gawk-common pgawk dgawk"
>
> would it make sense to have RPROVIDES

dgawk and pgawk were debugging and profiling gawk frontends, and
whilst the new gawk binary has the same functionality it doesn't have
compatibility binaries.  So no, I don't think it's sensible to have
RPROVIDES in this case.

Ross