[11/40] classes/package_rpm.bbclass: Enhance diagnostic messages
Submitted by Mark Hatle on June 22, 2011, 5:36 p.m.
|
Patch ID: 6275
Details
Commit Message
@@ -486,7 +486,10 @@ python write_specfile () {
spec_files_top.append('%files')
spec_files_top.append('%defattr(-,-,-,-)')
if file_list:
+ bb.note("Creating RPM package for %s" % splitname)
spec_files_top.extend(file_list)
+ else:
+ bb.note("Creating EMPTY RPM Package for %s" % splitname)
spec_files_top.append('')
bb.utils.unlockfile(lf)
@@ -569,11 +572,13 @@ python write_specfile () {
if not file_list and bb.data.getVar('ALLOW_EMPTY', localdata) != "1":
bb.note("Not creating empty RPM package for %s" % splitname)
else:
- bb.note("Creating RPM package for %s" % splitname)
spec_files_bottom.append('%%files -n %s' % splitname)
spec_files_bottom.append('%defattr(-,-,-,-)')
if file_list:
+ bb.note("Creating RPM package for %s" % splitname)
spec_files_bottom.extend(file_list)
+ else:
+ bb.note("Creating EMPTY RPM Package for %s" % splitname)
spec_files_bottom.append('')
del localdata
We clearly state now if we are: * Skipping an empty package * Creating a (full) package * Creating an empty package Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com> --- meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass | 7 ++++++- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)