Message ID | bf65f77f194b7e5a9047a2196e87a2d59f8e0e6b.1373468672.git.emilia.maria.silvia.ciobanu@intel.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/docbook-sgml-dtd/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/docbook-sgml-dtd/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb index a7df4f9..869bffe 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/docbook-sgml-dtd/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/docbook-sgml-dtd/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE-OASIS;md5=c608985dd5f7f215e669e7639a0b1d2e" DTD_VERSION = "3.1" PR = "${INC_PR}.0" +PV = "31" # Note: the upstream sources are not distributed with a license file. # LICENSE-OASIS is included as a "patch" to workaround this. When
On 10 July 2013 16:07, Emilia Ciobanu <emilia.maria.silvia.ciobanu@intel.com> wrote: > PR = "${INC_PR}.0" > +PV = "31" I thought the general trend was to move away from real PVs to the autoincrementer? I'm just curious to know what issue prompted the move back to real PVs?
Hi Trevor, I think this is a misunderstanding. We are currently using the autoincrementation mechanism for the PR of the packages and not for the PV. In this case the PV variable was missing from the recipe. Thanks, Ema > -----Original Message----- > From: Trevor Woerner [mailto:trevor.woerner@linaro.org] > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 11:58 AM > To: Ciobanu, Emilia Maria Silvia > Cc: openembedded-core > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb: Add > real PV inside the recipe > > On 10 July 2013 16:07, Emilia Ciobanu > <emilia.maria.silvia.ciobanu@intel.com> wrote: > > PR = "${INC_PR}.0" > > +PV = "31" > > > I thought the general trend was to move away from real PVs to the > autoincrementer? I'm just curious to know what issue prompted the move > back to real PVs?
On 11 July 2013 10:55, Ciobanu, Emilia Maria Silvia <emilia.maria.silvia.ciobanu@intel.com> wrote: > I think this is a misunderstanding. We are currently using the autoincrementation > mechanism for the PR of the packages and not for the PV. In this case the PV variable > was missing from the recipe. Whoops! Yes I see. Sorry about that :-)
Signed-off-by: Emilia Ciobanu <emilia.maria.silvia.ciobanu@intel.com> --- .../docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native.bb | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)