Message ID | cover.1361464203.git.sgw@linux.intel.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On 21 February 2013 16:31, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote: > MiLo (1): > util-linux: Add package for libmount This appears fine but I'm seeing weird problems where although the library is moved out, the shlibdeps are not correct (i.e. util-linux-fsck will occasionally revert to finding libmount.so.1 in util-linux). I'd love to understand why. :/ Ross
On 02/21/2013 05:39 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 21 February 2013 16:31, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> MiLo (1): >> util-linux: Add package for libmount > > This appears fine but I'm seeing weird problems where although the > library is moved out, the shlibdeps are not correct (i.e. > util-linux-fsck will occasionally revert to finding libmount.so.1 in > util-linux). I'd love to understand why. :/ If there's anything I can do to help let me know. Is this now blocking the integration? I haven't found any issues with the dependencies, but I've only tested with the util-linux-mount/umount pacakges, and the sfdisk package (which does not depend on libmount). Mike.
On 22 February 2013 07:11, Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@topic.nl> wrote: > If there's anything I can do to help let me know. Is this now blocking the > integration? > > I haven't found any issues with the dependencies, but I've only tested with > the util-linux-mount/umount pacakges, and the sfdisk package (which does not > depend on libmount). Can you verify that util-linux-fsck is no longer depending on util-linux with this patch? Maybe I've got a confused build area. Ross
On 02/22/2013 10:52 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 22 February 2013 07:11, Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@topic.nl> wrote: >> If there's anything I can do to help let me know. Is this now blocking the >> integration? >> >> I haven't found any issues with the dependencies, but I've only tested with >> the util-linux-mount/umount pacakges, and the sfdisk package (which does not >> depend on libmount). > > Can you verify that util-linux-fsck is no longer depending on > util-linux with this patch? Maybe I've got a confused build area. This is what opkg reports on my running systems, with the libmount patch applied, looks fine to me, a few require libmount1, and none require util-linux itself. For example: Package: util-linux-mount Version: 2.22.2-r1 Depends: libmount1 (>= 2.22.2), update-alternatives-cworth, libc6 (>= 2.17) Package: util-linux-fdisk Version: 2.22.2-r1 Depends: update-alternatives-cworth, libblkid1 (>= 2.22.2), libc6 (>= 2.17) Package: util-linux-fsck Version: 2.22.2-r1 Depends: libmount1 (>= 2.22.2), update-alternatives-cworth, libblkid1 (>= 2.22.2), libc6 (>= 2.17)
On 23 February 2013 09:33, Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@topic.nl> wrote: > This is what opkg reports on my running systems, with the libmount patch > applied, looks fine to me, a few require libmount1, and none require > util-linux itself. For example: Good, just local weirdness for me then. Ross