[2/2] unifdef-native: Correct LICENSE

Submitted by Khem Raj on Aug. 18, 2012, 4:56 a.m.

Details

Message ID 1345265802-16783-2-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Khem Raj Aug. 18, 2012, 4:56 a.m.
The header in sourcefile says its BSD licensed
not GPL therefore make the correction

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
---
 .../unifdef/unifdef-native_2.6.18+git.bb           |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Patch hide | download patch | download mbox

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/unifdef/unifdef-native_2.6.18+git.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/unifdef/unifdef-native_2.6.18+git.bb
index 1b93816..3909e1c 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/unifdef/unifdef-native_2.6.18+git.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/unifdef/unifdef-native_2.6.18+git.bb
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ 
 DESCRIPTION = "Kernel header preprocessor"
 SECTION = "devel"
-LICENSE = "GPL"
+LICENSE = "BSD"
+
+PR = "r1"
 
 LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://${WORKDIR}/unifdef.c;endline=32;md5=1a33f5c39aa718a89058721df61979bd"
 

Comments

Paul Eggleton Aug. 18, 2012, 11:40 a.m.
On Friday 17 August 2012 21:56:42 Khem Raj wrote:
> The header in sourcefile says its BSD licensed
> not GPL therefore make the correction

Could we be more specific there and say LICENSE = "BSD-2-Clause" ?

Thanks,
Paul
Khem Raj Aug. 18, 2012, 5:07 p.m.
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Paul Eggleton
<paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Could we be more specific there and say LICENSE = "BSD-2-Clause" ?

Its more BSD-3-Clause actually. So I have sent a V2

Thx
-Khem