| Message ID | 1325752666-28560-1-git-send-email-liming.wang@windriver.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 3:37 AM, Liming Wang <liming.wang@windriver.com> wrote: > Hi Richard, > > These patches are aimed to replace emulation of qemuppc from prep to mac99. > With this new emulation, qemuppc now supports framebuffer and the network > works well. > > The kernel config also needs modification and I will let Bruce to review the > patches. I have the patches in my inbox now, I'm reviewing and merging them shortly. I'll pull these changes in to do some boot and runtime testing as well. Richard/Saul: if it works better for coordination purposes, I can do the kernel part, take this into my tree as well and then send a single coordinated pull request when everything is known to work together. Cheers, Bruce > > The following changes since commit 0ff1d667dc23b0cc903c18f1b5e032c2b6630aae: > > distro: Add poky-tiny distro definition > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://128.224.162.211/poky.git qemuppc-new > > Liming Wang (4): > qemuppc: replace emulation of qemuppc from prep to mac99 > qemuppc: add pointercal file > qemuppc: add machconfig > tslib: enable big endian support for qemuppc > > meta/conf/machine/qemuppc.conf | 2 +- > .../formfactor/files/qemuppc/machconfig | 10 ++++++++++ > .../pointercal/files/qemuppc/pointercal | Bin 0 -> 36 bytes > meta/recipes-graphics/tslib/tslib_1.0.bb | 1 + > scripts/runqemu | 7 +------ > scripts/runqemu-internal | 16 ++++++++-------- > 6 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > create mode 100755 meta/recipes-bsp/formfactor/files/qemuppc/machconfig > create mode 100644 meta/recipes-bsp/pointercal/files/qemuppc/pointercal > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 09:29 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 3:37 AM, Liming Wang <liming.wang@windriver.com> wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > > > These patches are aimed to replace emulation of qemuppc from prep to mac99. > > With this new emulation, qemuppc now supports framebuffer and the network > > works well. > > > > The kernel config also needs modification and I will let Bruce to review the > > patches. > > I have the patches in my inbox now, I'm reviewing and merging them shortly. > I'll pull these changes in to do some boot and runtime testing as well. > > Richard/Saul: if it works better for coordination purposes, I can do the kernel > part, take this into my tree as well and then send a single coordinated pull > request when everything is known to work together. Yes please. The userspace bits look reasonable to me but they need to be in step with the kernel changes. I'm looking forward to working framebuffer support :) Cheers, Richard
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 09:29 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 3:37 AM, Liming Wang <liming.wang@windriver.com> wrote: >> > Hi Richard, >> > >> > These patches are aimed to replace emulation of qemuppc from prep to mac99. >> > With this new emulation, qemuppc now supports framebuffer and the network >> > works well. >> > >> > The kernel config also needs modification and I will let Bruce to review the >> > patches. >> >> I have the patches in my inbox now, I'm reviewing and merging them shortly. >> I'll pull these changes in to do some boot and runtime testing as well. >> >> Richard/Saul: if it works better for coordination purposes, I can do the kernel >> part, take this into my tree as well and then send a single coordinated pull >> request when everything is known to work together. > > Yes please. > > The userspace bits look reasonable to me but they need to be in step > with the kernel changes. I'm looking forward to working framebuffer > support :) In case anyone is wondering, I merged and started testing this on Friday. I'm working with Liming to hunt down a mouse grab/cusor and keyboard issue that I'm seeing. But other than that, everything worked nicely. If I can't resolve the two minor items quickly, I'll send the queue anyway and more eyes can be put on the problem. Cheers, Bruce > > Cheers, > > Richard >
On 01/05/2012 12:37 AM, Liming Wang wrote: > Hi Richard, > > These patches are aimed to replace emulation of qemuppc from prep to mac99. > With this new emulation, qemuppc now supports framebuffer and the network > works well. > Is there anything that needs to be setup differently for the runqemu scripts? Our sanity tests have failed after changing to the new ppc code and I wonder if there is something for the command line or ??? THanks Sau! > The kernel config also needs modification and I will let Bruce to review the > patches. > > The following changes since commit 0ff1d667dc23b0cc903c18f1b5e032c2b6630aae: > > distro: Add poky-tiny distro definition > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://128.224.162.211/poky.git qemuppc-new > > Liming Wang (4): > qemuppc: replace emulation of qemuppc from prep to mac99 > qemuppc: add pointercal file > qemuppc: add machconfig > tslib: enable big endian support for qemuppc > > meta/conf/machine/qemuppc.conf | 2 +- > .../formfactor/files/qemuppc/machconfig | 10 ++++++++++ > .../pointercal/files/qemuppc/pointercal | Bin 0 -> 36 bytes > meta/recipes-graphics/tslib/tslib_1.0.bb | 1 + > scripts/runqemu | 7 +------ > scripts/runqemu-internal | 16 ++++++++-------- > 6 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > create mode 100755 meta/recipes-bsp/formfactor/files/qemuppc/machconfig > create mode 100644 meta/recipes-bsp/pointercal/files/qemuppc/pointercal >
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On 01/05/2012 12:37 AM, Liming Wang wrote: >> >> Hi Richard, >> >> These patches are aimed to replace emulation of qemuppc from prep to >> mac99. >> With this new emulation, qemuppc now supports framebuffer and the network >> works well. >> > Is there anything that needs to be setup differently for the runqemu > scripts? Our sanity tests have failed after changing to the new ppc code > and I wonder if there is something for the command line or ??? What type of failure ? boot ? I'm building and booting it all the time, so I can help there. Or are you talking about something in particular like the network ? disk ? Bruce > > THanks > Sau! > > >> The kernel config also needs modification and I will let Bruce to review >> the >> patches. >> >> The following changes since commit >> 0ff1d667dc23b0cc903c18f1b5e032c2b6630aae: >> >> distro: Add poky-tiny distro definition >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> >> git://128.224.162.211/poky.git qemuppc-new >> >> Liming Wang (4): >> qemuppc: replace emulation of qemuppc from prep to mac99 >> qemuppc: add pointercal file >> qemuppc: add machconfig >> tslib: enable big endian support for qemuppc >> >> meta/conf/machine/qemuppc.conf | 2 +- >> .../formfactor/files/qemuppc/machconfig | 10 ++++++++++ >> .../pointercal/files/qemuppc/pointercal | Bin 0 -> 36 bytes >> meta/recipes-graphics/tslib/tslib_1.0.bb | 1 + >> scripts/runqemu | 7 +------ >> scripts/runqemu-internal | 16 >> ++++++++-------- >> 6 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) >> create mode 100755 meta/recipes-bsp/formfactor/files/qemuppc/machconfig >> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-bsp/pointercal/files/qemuppc/pointercal >> > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 23:12 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On 01/05/2012 12:37 AM, Liming Wang wrote: > >> > >> Hi Richard, > >> > >> These patches are aimed to replace emulation of qemuppc from prep to > >> mac99. > >> With this new emulation, qemuppc now supports framebuffer and the network > >> works well. > >> > > Is there anything that needs to be setup differently for the runqemu > > scripts? Our sanity tests have failed after changing to the new ppc code > > and I wonder if there is something for the command line or ??? > > What type of failure ? boot ? I'm building and booting it all the time, so I can > help there. Or are you talking about something in particular like the network ? > disk ? I ran a test build and can confirm that whilst qemuppc can boot, there is no network. We need to fix the network ASAP as our automated testing depends on working network access... Cheers, Richard
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 6:48 AM, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 23:12 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> > On 01/05/2012 12:37 AM, Liming Wang wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Richard, >> >> >> >> These patches are aimed to replace emulation of qemuppc from prep to >> >> mac99. >> >> With this new emulation, qemuppc now supports framebuffer and the network >> >> works well. >> >> >> > Is there anything that needs to be setup differently for the runqemu >> > scripts? Our sanity tests have failed after changing to the new ppc code >> > and I wonder if there is something for the command line or ??? >> >> What type of failure ? boot ? I'm building and booting it all the time, so I can >> help there. Or are you talking about something in particular like the network ? >> disk ? > > I ran a test build and can confirm that whilst qemuppc can boot, there > is no network. We need to fix the network ASAP as our automated testing > depends on working network access... Liming is out for the next week or so, but I'll see what I can do on Monday. He did report a properly working networking with his initial submission, so it should just be a configuration issue. Cheers, Bruce > > Cheers, > > Richard > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 6:48 AM, Richard Purdie > <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >> On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 23:12 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote: >>> > On 01/05/2012 12:37 AM, Liming Wang wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Hi Richard, >>> >> >>> >> These patches are aimed to replace emulation of qemuppc from prep to >>> >> mac99. >>> >> With this new emulation, qemuppc now supports framebuffer and the network >>> >> works well. >>> >> >>> > Is there anything that needs to be setup differently for the runqemu >>> > scripts? Our sanity tests have failed after changing to the new ppc code >>> > and I wonder if there is something for the command line or ??? >>> >>> What type of failure ? boot ? I'm building and booting it all the time, so I can >>> help there. Or are you talking about something in particular like the network ? >>> disk ? >> >> I ran a test build and can confirm that whilst qemuppc can boot, there >> is no network. We need to fix the network ASAP as our automated testing >> depends on working network access... > > Liming is out for the next week or so, but I'll see what I can do on Monday. > He did report a properly working networking with his initial submission, so it > should just be a configuration issue. Does anyone have more details on this for me ? I just did a build and boot into sato and everything worked here. Mouse was fine, opened the terminal, ifconfig reports and up and running ethernet, and I can ping and ssh out of qemppc to my host machine. So I've got nothing to test here, since it all worked. Note: there is one small change to runqemu that I can send along to enable the keyboard in sato, but that's all that I have to go on. Cheers, Bruce > > Cheers, > > Bruce > >> >> Cheers, >> >> Richard >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > > > > -- > "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await > thee at its end"
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Bruce Ashfield > <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 6:48 AM, Richard Purdie >> <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >>> On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 23:12 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >>>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote: >>>> > On 01/05/2012 12:37 AM, Liming Wang wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> Hi Richard, >>>> >> >>>> >> These patches are aimed to replace emulation of qemuppc from prep to >>>> >> mac99. >>>> >> With this new emulation, qemuppc now supports framebuffer and the network >>>> >> works well. >>>> >> >>>> > Is there anything that needs to be setup differently for the runqemu >>>> > scripts? Our sanity tests have failed after changing to the new ppc code >>>> > and I wonder if there is something for the command line or ??? >>>> >>>> What type of failure ? boot ? I'm building and booting it all the time, so I can >>>> help there. Or are you talking about something in particular like the network ? >>>> disk ? >>> >>> I ran a test build and can confirm that whilst qemuppc can boot, there >>> is no network. We need to fix the network ASAP as our automated testing >>> depends on working network access... >> >> Liming is out for the next week or so, but I'll see what I can do on Monday. >> He did report a properly working networking with his initial submission, so it >> should just be a configuration issue. > > Does anyone have more details on this for me ? I just did a build and boot into > sato and everything worked here. Mouse was fine, opened the terminal, ifconfig > reports and up and running ethernet, and I can ping and ssh out of qemppc to > my host machine. > > So I've got nothing to test here, since it all worked. > > Note: there is one small change to runqemu that I can send along to enable the > keyboard in sato, but that's all that I have to go on. As was discussed on IRC, I was booting my 3.2 kernel .. where everything worked. I've fixed this on 3.0 and sent a pull request. Bruce > > Cheers, > > Bruce > >> >> Cheers, >> >> Bruce >> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Richard >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Openembedded-core mailing list >>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >> >> >> >> -- >> "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await >> thee at its end" > > > > -- > "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await > thee at its end"
Hi Richard, These patches are aimed to replace emulation of qemuppc from prep to mac99. With this new emulation, qemuppc now supports framebuffer and the network works well. The kernel config also needs modification and I will let Bruce to review the patches. The following changes since commit 0ff1d667dc23b0cc903c18f1b5e032c2b6630aae: distro: Add poky-tiny distro definition are available in the git repository at: git://128.224.162.211/poky.git qemuppc-new Liming Wang (4): qemuppc: replace emulation of qemuppc from prep to mac99 qemuppc: add pointercal file qemuppc: add machconfig tslib: enable big endian support for qemuppc meta/conf/machine/qemuppc.conf | 2 +- .../formfactor/files/qemuppc/machconfig | 10 ++++++++++ .../pointercal/files/qemuppc/pointercal | Bin 0 -> 36 bytes meta/recipes-graphics/tslib/tslib_1.0.bb | 1 + scripts/runqemu | 7 +------ scripts/runqemu-internal | 16 ++++++++-------- 6 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) create mode 100755 meta/recipes-bsp/formfactor/files/qemuppc/machconfig create mode 100644 meta/recipes-bsp/pointercal/files/qemuppc/pointercal