[meta-oe,v3] iproute2: split ip to individual package

Submitted by Sinan Kaya on Dec. 16, 2020, 4:45 p.m. | Patch ID: 178965

Details

Message ID 20201216164510.9823-1-okaya@kernel.org
State Superseded
Headers show

Commit Message

Sinan Kaya Dec. 16, 2020, 4:45 p.m.
Move the ip tool into its own package. Useful for size constrained
systems that only want the ip tool.

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@kernel.org>

---
 .../iproute2/iproute2.inc                     | 47 ++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#145769): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/145769
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/79005154/1003190
Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [mhalstead@linuxfoundation.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Patch hide | download patch | download mbox

diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/iproute2/iproute2.inc b/meta/recipes-connectivity/iproute2/iproute2.inc
index 403d264308c..c7a3d547dae 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-connectivity/iproute2/iproute2.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-connectivity/iproute2/iproute2.inc
@@ -46,32 +46,75 @@  do_install () {
 # The .so files in iproute2-tc are modules, not traditional libraries
 INSANE_SKIP_${PN}-tc = "dev-so"
 
-PACKAGES =+ "\
+IPROUTE2_PACKAGES =+ "\
+    ${PN}-bridge \
     ${PN}-devlink \
     ${PN}-genl \
+    ${PN}-ifcfg \
     ${PN}-ifstat \
+    ${PN}-ip \
+    ${PN}-lib \
     ${PN}-lnstat \
     ${PN}-nstat \
+    ${PN}-rdma \
+    ${PN}-routef \
+    ${PN}-routel \
+    ${PN}-rtmon \
+    ${PN}-rtpr \
     ${PN}-rtacct \
     ${PN}-ss \
     ${PN}-tc \
     ${PN}-tipc \
 "
+RDEPENDS_${PN}-bridge = "${PN}-lib"
+RDEPENDS_${PN}-devlink = "${PN}-lib"
+RDEPENDS_${PN}-genl = "${PN}-lib"
+RDEPENDS_${PN}-ifcfg = "${PN}-lib"
+RDEPENDS_${PN}-ifstat = "${PN}-lib"
+RDEPENDS_${PN}-ip = "${PN}-lib"
+RDEPENDS_${PN}-lib = "${PN}-lib"
+RDEPENDS_${PN}-lnstat = "${PN}-lib"
+RDEPENDS_${PN}-nstat = "${PN}-lib"
+RDEPENDS_${PN}-rdma = "${PN}-lib"
+RDEPENDS_${PN}-routef = "${PN}-lib"
+RDEPENDS_${PN}-routel = "${PN}-lib"
+RDEPENDS_${PN}-rtmon = "${PN}-lib"
+RDEPENDS_${PN}-rtpr = "${PN}-lib"
+RDEPENDS_${PN}-rtacct = "${PN}-lib"
+RDEPENDS_${PN}-ss = "${PN}-lib"
+RDEPENDS_${PN}-tc = "${PN}-lib"
+RDEPENDS_${PN}-tipc = "${PN}-lib"
 
+PACKAGES += "${IPROUTE2_PACKAGES}"
+RDEPENDS_${PN} += "${IPROUTE2_PACKAGES}"
+ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN} = "1"
+
+FILES_${PN} = ""
 FILES_${PN}-tc = "${base_sbindir}/tc* \
                   ${libdir}/tc/*.so"
 FILES_${PN}-lnstat = "${base_sbindir}/lnstat \
                       ${base_sbindir}/ctstat \
                       ${base_sbindir}/rtstat"
 FILES_${PN}-ifstat = "${base_sbindir}/ifstat"
+FILES_${PN}-ip = "${base_sbindir}/ip.${PN} ${sysconfdir}/iproute2"
 FILES_${PN}-genl = "${base_sbindir}/genl"
 FILES_${PN}-rtacct = "${base_sbindir}/rtacct"
 FILES_${PN}-nstat = "${base_sbindir}/nstat"
 FILES_${PN}-ss = "${base_sbindir}/ss"
 FILES_${PN}-tipc = "${base_sbindir}/tipc"
 FILES_${PN}-devlink = "${base_sbindir}/devlink"
+FILES_${PN}-rdma = "${base_sbindir}/rdma"
+FILES_${PN}-routef = "${base_sbindir}/routef"
+FILES_${PN}-rtpr = "${base_sbindir}/rtpr"
+FILES_${PN}-rtmon = "${base_sbindir}/rtmon"
+FILES_${PN}-routel = "${base_sbindir}/routel"
+FILES_${PN}-bridge = "${base_sbindir}/bridge"
+FILES_${PN}-ifcfg = "${base_sbindir}/ifcfg"
+FILES_${PN}-ip = "${base_sbindir}/ip.${BPN} ${sysconfdir}"
+FILES_${PN}-lib = "${localstatedir}"
+
 
-ALTERNATIVE_${PN} = "ip"
+ALTERNATIVE_${PN}-ip = "ip"
 ALTERNATIVE_TARGET[ip] = "${base_sbindir}/ip.${BPN}"
 ALTERNATIVE_LINK_NAME[ip] = "${base_sbindir}/ip"
 ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY = "100"

Comments

Richard Purdie Dec. 16, 2020, 5:24 p.m.
On Wed, 2020-12-16 at 12:09 -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 12/16/2020 12:00 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:

> > I accept there is a case for splitting out ip, the patch now splits

> > out

> > every binary though? That isn't what the commit message says...

> 

> I thought of going all the way to split everything since I'm here.

> 

> Is your preference to keep ip or have individual packages for the

> remaining ?


I have a very strong preference for only splitting the things we need
to split.

Cheers,

Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#145776): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/145776
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/79005154/1003190
Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [mhalstead@linuxfoundation.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Sinan Kaya Dec. 16, 2020, 5:25 p.m.
On 12/16/2020 12:24 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> Is your preference to keep ip or have individual packages for the

>> remaining ?

> I have a very strong preference for only splitting the things we need

> to split.


Sounds good, I'll rework.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#145777): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/145777
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/79005154/1003190
Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [mhalstead@linuxfoundation.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Sinan Kaya Dec. 18, 2020, 5 a.m.
This is a system generated Comment: Patch 178965 was automatically marked as superseded by patch 179039.