[01/23] netbase: upgrade 6.1 -> 6.2

Submitted by Alexander Kanavin on Dec. 4, 2020, 8:07 p.m. | Patch ID: 178719

Details

Message ID 20201204200737.7072-1-alex.kanavin@gmail.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Alexander Kanavin Dec. 4, 2020, 8:07 p.m.
Not sure why this didn't inherit allarch, but now it does - only
static data is installed.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>

---
 .../netbase/{netbase_6.1.bb => netbase_6.2.bb}      | 13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
 rename meta/recipes-core/netbase/{netbase_6.1.bb => netbase_6.2.bb} (65%)

-- 
2.29.2
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#145295): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/145295
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/78718034/1003190
Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [mhalstead@linuxfoundation.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Patch hide | download patch | download mbox

diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase_6.1.bb b/meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase_6.2.bb
similarity index 65%
rename from meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase_6.1.bb
rename to meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase_6.2.bb
index 33eca459d5..a54d2e7764 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase_6.1.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase_6.2.bb
@@ -6,17 +6,18 @@  LICENSE = "GPLv2"
 LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://debian/copyright;md5=3dd6192d306f582dee7687da3d8748ab"
 PE = "1"
 
-SRC_URI = "${DEBIAN_MIRROR}/main/n/${BPN}/${BPN}_${PV}~bpo10+1.tar.xz"
-S = "${WORKDIR}/${BPN}-${PV}~bpo10+1"
+SRC_URI = "${DEBIAN_MIRROR}/main/n/${BPN}/${BPN}_${PV}.tar.xz"
 
-SRC_URI[md5sum] = "4fa7517285b4045ac0dc8dbf6730dd7a"
-SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "4e9c3082dff8896cb6b6bea9bb2200d82fb0d7c8d8c8fc9b18704fe553316237"
+inherit allarch
+
+SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "309a24146a06347d654b261e9e07a82fab844b173674a42e223803dd8258541e"
 
 UPSTREAM_CHECK_URI = "${DEBIAN_MIRROR}/main/n/netbase/"
-do_install () {
 
-	install -d ${D}/${mandir}/man8 ${D}${sysconfdir}
+do_install () {
+	install -d ${D}${sysconfdir}
 	install -m 0644 ${S}/etc/rpc ${D}${sysconfdir}/rpc
 	install -m 0644 ${S}/etc/protocols ${D}${sysconfdir}/protocols
 	install -m 0644 ${S}/etc/services ${D}${sysconfdir}/services
+	install -m 0644 ${S}/etc/ethertypes ${D}${sysconfdir}/ethertypes
 }

Comments

Jonathan Rajotte-Julien Dec. 4, 2020, 9:21 p.m.
Hi,

> This is the patch that disables the sporadically failing stuff:


> [

> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-tools/0001-tests-regression-disable-the-tools-live-tests.patch

> |

> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-tools/0001-tests-regression-disable-the-tools-live-tests.patch

> ]


I suspect that some of these tests are not that sporadic anymore since a lot of work was done on the live feature. Still, it is not up to you to prove this.

> And this is the bug I had filed upstream:

> [ https://bugs.lttng.org/issues/1217 | https://bugs.lttng.org/issues/1217 ]


Well, time goes by fast. 

> As no movement occurred on that bug since Jan, I am not keen on filing

> additional bugs, but you can see the additional,


I'm okay with taking responsibility regarding the long time to fix but not so much in not fixing bug/issues that are simply not reported. 
Not all issues are of the same nature and require the same amount of work to fix. 

> currently occuring failures here:

> [

> https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/non-release/20201204-4/testresults/qemux86-64-ptest/lttng-tools.log

> |

> https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/non-release/20201204-4/testresults/qemux86-64-ptest/lttng-tools.log

> ]


Thanks for the link. Any link or doc that would allow me to easily setup a similar build (conf file, ram size etc.).

Is core-image-sato-sdk-ptest a good image to reproduce this?

Cheers
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#145320): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/145320
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/78718062/1003190
Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [mhalstead@linuxfoundation.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Alexander Kanavin Dec. 4, 2020, 9:49 p.m.
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 22:21, Jonathan Rajotte-Julien <
jonathan.rajotte-julien@efficios.com> wrote:

> > And this is the bug I had filed upstream:

> > [ https://bugs.lttng.org/issues/1217 |

> https://bugs.lttng.org/issues/1217 ]

>

> Thanks for the link. Any link or doc that would allow me to easily setup a

> similar build (conf file, ram size etc.).

>

> Is core-image-sato-sdk-ptest a good image to reproduce this?

>


Yes, the steps to reproduce are the same as in the already filed bug, but
you need to build the latest poky master.
You can also drop the patch that does the test disabling to see if the
previous issues are still there.

Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#145323): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/145323
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/78718062/1003190
Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [mhalstead@linuxfoundation.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-