Message ID | 03a910e12b1619fc40345c2cfa31afb428bd777f.1323327959.git.xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/images/core-image-gtk-directfb.bb b/meta/recipes-graphics/images/core-image-gtk-directfb.bb new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b0ae469 --- /dev/null +++ b/meta/recipes-graphics/images/core-image-gtk-directfb.bb @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +LICENSE = "MIT" +PR="r0" + +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://${COREBASE}/LICENSE;md5=3f40d7994397109285ec7b81fdeb3b58 \ + file://${COREBASE}/meta/COPYING.MIT;md5=3da9cfbcb788c80a0384361b4de20420" + + +DEPENDS += "task-core-gtk-directfb" + +RDEPENDS_${PN} += " \ + task-core-gtk-directfb-base \ + " + +inherit core-image + +IMAGE_INSTALL += "\ + ${POKY_BASE_INSTALL} \ + task-core-basic \ + module-init-tools \ + task-core-gtk-directfb-base \ +"
Hi, 2011/12/8 Xiaofeng Yan <xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com>: [snip] > +IMAGE_INSTALL += "\ > + ${POKY_BASE_INSTALL} \ I'm just curious, is this a legitimate OE-Core variable?
On 12/8/11 7:22 AM, Samuel Stirtzel wrote: > Hi, > > 2011/12/8 Xiaofeng Yan<xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com>: > [snip] >> +IMAGE_INSTALL += "\ >> + ${POKY_BASE_INSTALL} \ > > I'm just curious, is this a legitimate OE-Core variable? > > Yes it is, I ran into this yesterday and did some investigation. POKY_BASE_INSTALL = '\ task-core-boot \ task-base-extended \ \ ${@base_contains("IMAGE_FEATURES", "package-management", "", "${ROOTFS_PKGMANAGE_BOOTSTRAP}",d)} \ \ ${POKY_EXTRA_INSTALL} \ ' This is defined in core-image.bbclass. I thought when we made the transition to oe-core that we had caught all of these names, but apparently we missed some. This is simply a cosmetic bug, it is unintended. --Mark