recipeutils-test: Add missing LIC_FILES_CHKSUM

Submitted by Khem Raj on Dec. 6, 2018, 12:33 a.m. | Patch ID: 156943

Details

Message ID 20181206003355.18035-1-raj.khem@gmail.com
State Accepted
Commit ee65f7ab11302982124bcd1974a05c87342ab28e
Headers show

Commit Message

Khem Raj Dec. 6, 2018, 12:33 a.m.
Fixes
ERROR: QA Issue: recipeutils-test: Recipe file fetches files and does
not have license file information (LIC_FILES_CHKSUM) [license-checksum]

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
---
 meta-selftest/recipes-test/recipeutils/recipeutils-test_1.2.bb | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Patch hide | download patch | download mbox

diff --git a/meta-selftest/recipes-test/recipeutils/recipeutils-test_1.2.bb b/meta-selftest/recipes-test/recipeutils/recipeutils-test_1.2.bb
index f6da97b2d4..7c20d9a683 100644
--- a/meta-selftest/recipes-test/recipeutils/recipeutils-test_1.2.bb
+++ b/meta-selftest/recipes-test/recipeutils/recipeutils-test_1.2.bb
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@  SUMMARY = "Test recipe for recipeutils.patch_recipe()"
 require recipeutils-test.inc
 
 LICENSE = "Proprietary"
-
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://${WORKDIR}/somefile;md5=d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e"
 DEPENDS += "virtual/libx11"
 
 BBCLASSEXTEND = "native nativesdk"

Comments

Ross Burton Dec. 6, 2018, 12:09 p.m.
Might be easier to change the license to CLOSED, as that skips the
license QA entirely.

(arguably proprietary should do the same)

Ross
Khem Raj Dec. 6, 2018, 3:47 p.m.
Does that serve a better purpose? Or just a different way of achieving same
thing

On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 4:09 AM Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote:

> Might be easier to change the license to CLOSED, as that skips the
> license QA entirely.
>
> (arguably proprietary should do the same)
>
> Ross
>