| Message ID | 7e3c2e21652019ed5dd2d45beff62a855152f0a4.1320430778.git.otavio@ossystems.com.br |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/dhcp/dhcp4.inc b/meta/recipes-connectivity/dhcp/dhcp.inc similarity index 100% rename from meta/recipes-connectivity/dhcp/dhcp4.inc rename to meta/recipes-connectivity/dhcp/dhcp.inc diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/dhcp/dhcp_4.2.0.bb b/meta/recipes-connectivity/dhcp/dhcp_4.2.0.bb index 85f473d..223522f 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-connectivity/dhcp/dhcp_4.2.0.bb +++ b/meta/recipes-connectivity/dhcp/dhcp_4.2.0.bb @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -require dhcp4.inc +require dhcp.inc PR = "r2"
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 18:20 +0000, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> > --- > .../dhcp/{dhcp4.inc => dhcp.inc} | 0 > meta/recipes-connectivity/dhcp/dhcp_4.2.0.bb | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > rename meta/recipes-connectivity/dhcp/{dhcp4.inc => dhcp.inc} (100%) Why is this patch an improvement? I don't have anything against it particularly but it doesn't seem that it buys much either, and there is no clue in the commit message as to what it is trying to achieve. p.
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 19:17, Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org> wrote: > Why is this patch an improvement? I don't have anything against it > particularly but it doesn't seem that it buys much either, and there is > no clue in the commit message as to what it is trying to achieve. Since we dropped the dhcp3.inc file makes no sense to have it named dhcp4.inc so I renamed it. Just as simple as that.
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> --- .../dhcp/{dhcp4.inc => dhcp.inc} | 0 meta/recipes-connectivity/dhcp/dhcp_4.2.0.bb | 2 +- 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-connectivity/dhcp/{dhcp4.inc => dhcp.inc} (100%)