[5/5] distro_tracking_fields: updates for sudo, mtools, grep, and openssh

Submitted by Scott Garman on Oct. 25, 2011, 9:36 p.m.

Details

Message ID 62b3eae763911554ab01754726ed7adacad1a8a4.1319576293.git.scott.a.garman@intel.com
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Scott Garman Oct. 25, 2011, 9:36 p.m.
Signed-off-by: Scott Garman <scott.a.garman@intel.com>
---
 .../conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc |   32 ++++++++++----------
 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

Patch hide | download patch | download mbox

diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc
index 1f3540e..936ef81 100644
--- a/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc
+++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc
@@ -813,12 +813,12 @@  RECIPE_MAINTAINER_pn-pax-utils = "Scott Garman <scott.a.garman@intel.com>"
 
 RECIPE_STATUS_pn-sudo = "green"
 RECIPE_DEPENDENCY_CHECK_pn-sudo = "not done"
-RECIPE_LATEST_VERSION_pn-sudo = "1.8.1p2"
+RECIPE_LATEST_VERSION_pn-sudo = "1.8.3"
 RECIPE_INTEL_SECTION_pn-sudo = "base utils"
-RECIPE_TIME_BETWEEN_LAST_TWO_RELEASES_pn-sudo = "1 month"
-RECIPE_LATEST_RELEASE_DATE_pn-sudo = "2011/05/16"
+RECIPE_TIME_BETWEEN_LAST_TWO_RELEASES_pn-sudo = "2 months"
+RECIPE_LATEST_RELEASE_DATE_pn-sudo = "2011/10/21"
 RECIPE_COMMENTS_pn-sudo = ""
-RECIPE_LAST_UPDATE_pn-sudo = "Jun 14, 2011"
+RECIPE_LAST_UPDATE_pn-sudo = "Oct 25, 2011"
 RECIPE_MAINTAINER_pn-sudo = "Scott Garman <scott.a.garman@intel.com>"
 
 RECIPE_STATUS_pn-blktool = "green"
@@ -1290,12 +1290,12 @@  DISTRO_PN_ALIAS_pn-msynctool = "OpenSuse=msynctool Mandriva=msynctool"
 
 RECIPE_STATUS_pn-mtools = "green"
 RECIPE_DEPENDENCY_CHECK_pn-mtools = "not done"
-RECIPE_LATEST_VERSION_pn-mtools = "4.0.16"
+RECIPE_LATEST_VERSION_pn-mtools = "4.0.17"
 RECIPE_INTEL_SECTION_pn-mtools = "optional"
-RECIPE_TIME_BETWEEN_LAST_TWO_RELEASES_pn-mtools = "6 months"
-RECIPE_LATEST_RELEASE_DATE_pn-mtools = "2011/04/16"
+RECIPE_TIME_BETWEEN_LAST_TWO_RELEASES_pn-mtools = "2 months"
+RECIPE_LATEST_RELEASE_DATE_pn-mtools = "2011/06/28"
 RECIPE_COMMENTS_pn-mtools = ""
-RECIPE_LAST_UPDATE_pn-mtools = "Jun 15, 2011"
+RECIPE_LAST_UPDATE_pn-mtools = "Oct 25, 2011"
 RECIPE_MAINTAINER_pn-mtools = "Scott Garman <scott.a.garman@intel.com>"
 
 RECIPE_STATUS_pn-pm-utils = "green"
@@ -2016,22 +2016,22 @@  RECIPE_MAINTAINER_pn-cronie = "Dexuan Cui <dexuan.cui@intel.com>"
 
 RECIPE_STATUS_pn-grep = "green" 
 RECIPE_DEPENDENCY_CHECK_pn-grep = "not done"
-RECIPE_LATEST_VERSION_pn-grep = "2.8"
+RECIPE_LATEST_VERSION_pn-grep = "2.9"
 RECIPE_INTEL_SECTION_pn-grep = "base"
 RECIPE_NO_OF_PATCHES_pn-grep = "0"
-RECIPE_TIME_BETWEEN_LAST_TWO_RELEASES_pn-grep = "8 months"
-RECIPE_LATEST_RELEASE_DATE_pn-grep = "05/2011"
-RECIPE_LAST_UPDATE_pn-grep = "Jun 5, 2011"
+RECIPE_TIME_BETWEEN_LAST_TWO_RELEASES_pn-grep = "1 month"
+RECIPE_LATEST_RELEASE_DATE_pn-grep = "06/2011"
+RECIPE_LAST_UPDATE_pn-grep = "Oct 25, 2011"
 RECIPE_MAINTAINER_pn-grep = "Scott Garman <scott.a.garman@intel.com>"
 
 RECIPE_STATUS_pn-openssh = "green" 
 RECIPE_DEPENDENCY_CHECK_pn-openssh = "not done"
-RECIPE_LATEST_VERSION_pn-openssh = "5.8p2"
+RECIPE_LATEST_VERSION_pn-openssh = "5.9p1"
 RECIPE_INTEL_SECTION_pn-openssh = "base"
 RECIPE_NO_OF_PATCHES_pn-openssh = "1"
-RECIPE_TIME_BETWEEN_LAST_TWO_RELEASES_pn-openssh = "3 months"
-RECIPE_LATEST_RELEASE_DATE_pn-openssh = "05/2011"
-RECIPE_LAST_UPDATE_pn-openssh = "Jun 5, 2011"
+RECIPE_TIME_BETWEEN_LAST_TWO_RELEASES_pn-openssh = "4 months"
+RECIPE_LATEST_RELEASE_DATE_pn-openssh = "09/2011"
+RECIPE_LAST_UPDATE_pn-openssh = "Oct 25, 2011"
 RECIPE_MAINTAINER_pn-openssh = "Scott Garman <scott.a.garman@intel.com>"
 
 RECIPE_STATUS_pn-tar = "green" 

Comments

Saul Wold Oct. 26, 2011, 8:37 p.m.
On 10/25/2011 11:36 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Scott Garman<scott.a.garman@intel.com>
> ---
>   .../conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc |   32 ++++++++++----------
>   1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc
> index 1f3540e..936ef81 100644
> --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc
> +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc
> @@ -813,12 +813,12 @@ RECIPE_MAINTAINER_pn-pax-utils = "Scott Garman<scott.a.garman@intel.com>"
>
>   RECIPE_STATUS_pn-sudo = "green"
>   RECIPE_DEPENDENCY_CHECK_pn-sudo = "not done"
> -RECIPE_LATEST_VERSION_pn-sudo = "1.8.1p2"
> +RECIPE_LATEST_VERSION_pn-sudo = "1.8.3"
>   RECIPE_INTEL_SECTION_pn-sudo = "base utils"
> -RECIPE_TIME_BETWEEN_LAST_TWO_RELEASES_pn-sudo = "1 month"
> -RECIPE_LATEST_RELEASE_DATE_pn-sudo = "2011/05/16"
> +RECIPE_TIME_BETWEEN_LAST_TWO_RELEASES_pn-sudo = "2 months"
> +RECIPE_LATEST_RELEASE_DATE_pn-sudo = "2011/10/21"
These date formats should be MMM DD, YYYY also, for all the data listed 
below also.

Thanks
	Sau!

>   RECIPE_COMMENTS_pn-sudo = ""
> -RECIPE_LAST_UPDATE_pn-sudo = "Jun 14, 2011"
> +RECIPE_LAST_UPDATE_pn-sudo = "Oct 25, 2011"
>   RECIPE_MAINTAINER_pn-sudo = "Scott Garman<scott.a.garman@intel.com>"
>
>   RECIPE_STATUS_pn-blktool = "green"
> @@ -1290,12 +1290,12 @@ DISTRO_PN_ALIAS_pn-msynctool = "OpenSuse=msynctool Mandriva=msynctool"
>
>   RECIPE_STATUS_pn-mtools = "green"
>   RECIPE_DEPENDENCY_CHECK_pn-mtools = "not done"
> -RECIPE_LATEST_VERSION_pn-mtools = "4.0.16"
> +RECIPE_LATEST_VERSION_pn-mtools = "4.0.17"
>   RECIPE_INTEL_SECTION_pn-mtools = "optional"
> -RECIPE_TIME_BETWEEN_LAST_TWO_RELEASES_pn-mtools = "6 months"
> -RECIPE_LATEST_RELEASE_DATE_pn-mtools = "2011/04/16"
> +RECIPE_TIME_BETWEEN_LAST_TWO_RELEASES_pn-mtools = "2 months"
> +RECIPE_LATEST_RELEASE_DATE_pn-mtools = "2011/06/28"
>   RECIPE_COMMENTS_pn-mtools = ""
> -RECIPE_LAST_UPDATE_pn-mtools = "Jun 15, 2011"
> +RECIPE_LAST_UPDATE_pn-mtools = "Oct 25, 2011"
>   RECIPE_MAINTAINER_pn-mtools = "Scott Garman<scott.a.garman@intel.com>"
>
>   RECIPE_STATUS_pn-pm-utils = "green"
> @@ -2016,22 +2016,22 @@ RECIPE_MAINTAINER_pn-cronie = "Dexuan Cui<dexuan.cui@intel.com>"
>
>   RECIPE_STATUS_pn-grep = "green"
>   RECIPE_DEPENDENCY_CHECK_pn-grep = "not done"
> -RECIPE_LATEST_VERSION_pn-grep = "2.8"
> +RECIPE_LATEST_VERSION_pn-grep = "2.9"
>   RECIPE_INTEL_SECTION_pn-grep = "base"
>   RECIPE_NO_OF_PATCHES_pn-grep = "0"
> -RECIPE_TIME_BETWEEN_LAST_TWO_RELEASES_pn-grep = "8 months"
> -RECIPE_LATEST_RELEASE_DATE_pn-grep = "05/2011"
> -RECIPE_LAST_UPDATE_pn-grep = "Jun 5, 2011"
> +RECIPE_TIME_BETWEEN_LAST_TWO_RELEASES_pn-grep = "1 month"
> +RECIPE_LATEST_RELEASE_DATE_pn-grep = "06/2011"
> +RECIPE_LAST_UPDATE_pn-grep = "Oct 25, 2011"
>   RECIPE_MAINTAINER_pn-grep = "Scott Garman<scott.a.garman@intel.com>"
>
>   RECIPE_STATUS_pn-openssh = "green"
>   RECIPE_DEPENDENCY_CHECK_pn-openssh = "not done"
> -RECIPE_LATEST_VERSION_pn-openssh = "5.8p2"
> +RECIPE_LATEST_VERSION_pn-openssh = "5.9p1"
>   RECIPE_INTEL_SECTION_pn-openssh = "base"
>   RECIPE_NO_OF_PATCHES_pn-openssh = "1"
> -RECIPE_TIME_BETWEEN_LAST_TWO_RELEASES_pn-openssh = "3 months"
> -RECIPE_LATEST_RELEASE_DATE_pn-openssh = "05/2011"
> -RECIPE_LAST_UPDATE_pn-openssh = "Jun 5, 2011"
> +RECIPE_TIME_BETWEEN_LAST_TWO_RELEASES_pn-openssh = "4 months"
> +RECIPE_LATEST_RELEASE_DATE_pn-openssh = "09/2011"
> +RECIPE_LAST_UPDATE_pn-openssh = "Oct 25, 2011"
>   RECIPE_MAINTAINER_pn-openssh = "Scott Garman<scott.a.garman@intel.com>"
>
>   RECIPE_STATUS_pn-tar = "green"
Paul Eggleton Oct. 31, 2011, 9:08 a.m.
On Wednesday 26 October 2011 21:37:39 Saul Wold wrote:
> > -RECIPE_TIME_BETWEEN_LAST_TWO_RELEASES_pn-sudo = "1 month"
> > -RECIPE_LATEST_RELEASE_DATE_pn-sudo = "2011/05/16"
> > +RECIPE_TIME_BETWEEN_LAST_TWO_RELEASES_pn-sudo = "2 months"
> > +RECIPE_LATEST_RELEASE_DATE_pn-sudo = "2011/10/21"
> 
> These date formats should be MMM DD, YYYY also, for all the data listed
> below also.

I'd been meaning to ask this before - is there a good reason for not being 
consistent and using the same format for all date fields in this file?

Cheers,
Paul
Saul Wold Oct. 31, 2011, 3:46 p.m.
On 10/31/2011 02:08 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 October 2011 21:37:39 Saul Wold wrote:
>>> -RECIPE_TIME_BETWEEN_LAST_TWO_RELEASES_pn-sudo = "1 month"
>>> -RECIPE_LATEST_RELEASE_DATE_pn-sudo = "2011/05/16"
>>> +RECIPE_TIME_BETWEEN_LAST_TWO_RELEASES_pn-sudo = "2 months"
>>> +RECIPE_LATEST_RELEASE_DATE_pn-sudo = "2011/10/21"
>>
>> These date formats should be MMM DD, YYYY also, for all the data listed
>> below also.
>
> I'd been meaning to ask this before - is there a good reason for not being
> consistent and using the same format for all date fields in this file?
>
Maybe I am missing your comment, is that what I not suggested in my 
comment above?  All date formats in the distro_tracking_fields should be 
in the MMM DD, YYY format.

Sau!

> Cheers,
> Paul
>
Koen Kooi Oct. 31, 2011, 4:05 p.m.
Op 31 okt. 2011, om 16:46 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven:

> On 10/31/2011 02:08 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>> On Wednesday 26 October 2011 21:37:39 Saul Wold wrote:
>>>> -RECIPE_TIME_BETWEEN_LAST_TWO_RELEASES_pn-sudo = "1 month"
>>>> -RECIPE_LATEST_RELEASE_DATE_pn-sudo = "2011/05/16"
>>>> +RECIPE_TIME_BETWEEN_LAST_TWO_RELEASES_pn-sudo = "2 months"
>>>> +RECIPE_LATEST_RELEASE_DATE_pn-sudo = "2011/10/21"
>>> 
>>> These date formats should be MMM DD, YYYY also, for all the data listed
>>> below also.
>> 
>> I'd been meaning to ask this before - is there a good reason for not being
>> consistent and using the same format for all date fields in this file?
>> 
> Maybe I am missing your comment, is that what I not suggested in my comment above?  All date formats in the distro_tracking_fields should be in the MMM DD, YYY format.

Can we please use a format that makes sense for non-americans as well? E.g. YYYY/MM/DD or DD/MM/YYYY or plain ISO (2011-10-31T17:04:31+01:00) without the hours? Anything that doesn't put days in between months and year.

regards,

KOen
Paul Eggleton Nov. 1, 2011, 11:38 a.m.
> Op 31 okt. 2011, om 16:46 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven:
> > On 10/31/2011 02:08 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> >> I'd been meaning to ask this before - is there a good reason for not
> >> being consistent and using the same format for all date fields in
> >> this file?> 
>
> > Maybe I am missing your comment, is that what I not suggested in my
> > comment above?  All date formats in the distro_tracking_fields should
> > be in the MMM DD, YYY format.

Right, I was really commenting on the previous state of the file which seemed 
to have one style for one field and another for the others. Apologies for the 
mixup, however...

On Monday 31 October 2011 17:05:24 Koen Kooi wrote:
> Can we please use a format that makes sense for non-americans as well? E.g.
> YYYY/MM/DD or DD/MM/YYYY or plain ISO (2011-10-31T17:04:31+01:00) 
> without the hours? Anything that doesn't put days in between months and
> year.

I definitely agree with this. ISO date format (or at the very least, numerical 
YYYY-MM-DD) would make much more sense to me.

Cheers,
Paul