Message ID | 84da55babd48c9de760d3ff271ba97e6a65926c8.1319096633.git.sgw@linux.intel.com |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc b/meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc index a52e33a..ee91983 100644 --- a/meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc +++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc @@ -44,6 +44,6 @@ PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-x86-64 = "x86_64" AVAILTUNES += "x86-64-x32" TUNE_FEATURES_tune-x86-64-x32 ?= "mx32" -BASE_LIB_tune-x86-64-x32 ?= "lib" +BASE_LIB_tune-x86-64-x32 ?= "libx32" PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-x86-64-x32 = "x86_64-x32" TUNE_PKGARCH .= "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "mx32", "-x32", "", d)}" diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-core2.inc b/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-core2.inc index 78f8f4d..565a39c 100644 --- a/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-core2.inc +++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-core2.inc @@ -20,5 +20,5 @@ PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-core2-64 = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-x86-64} core2-64 AVAILTUNES += "core2-64-x32" TUNE_FEATURES_tune-core2-64-x32 ?= "${TUNE_FEATURES_tune-x86-64-x32} core2" -BASE_LIB_tune-core2-64-x32 ?= "lib" +BASE_LIB_tune-core2-64-x32 ?= "libx32" PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-core2-64-x32 = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-x86-64-x32} core2-64-x32"
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 00:50 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > From: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com> Why is this a good thing? There is no explanation in the commit message. p.
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 10:02 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 00:50 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > > From: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com> > > > > Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com> > > Why is this a good thing? There is no explanation in the commit > message. Agreed, we need to improve the commit messages. I've merged this one with some additional comments but can people please keep good commit messages in mind. Cheers, Richard