[CONSOLIDATED,PULL,-,v2,09/26] x86 tune files: set baselib for x32 tune as libx32

Submitted by Saul Wold on Oct. 20, 2011, 7:50 a.m.

Details

Message ID 84da55babd48c9de760d3ff271ba97e6a65926c8.1319096633.git.sgw@linux.intel.com
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Saul Wold Oct. 20, 2011, 7:50 a.m. 
From: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>
---
 meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc |    2 +-
 meta/conf/machine/include/tune-core2.inc     |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Patch hide | download patch | download mbox 

diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc b/meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc
index a52e33a..ee91983 100644
--- a/meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc
+++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc
@@ -44,6 +44,6 @@  PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-x86-64 = "x86_64"
 
 AVAILTUNES += "x86-64-x32"
 TUNE_FEATURES_tune-x86-64-x32 ?= "mx32"
-BASE_LIB_tune-x86-64-x32 ?= "lib"
+BASE_LIB_tune-x86-64-x32 ?= "libx32"
 PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-x86-64-x32 = "x86_64-x32"
 TUNE_PKGARCH .= "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "mx32", "-x32", "", d)}"
diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-core2.inc b/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-core2.inc
index 78f8f4d..565a39c 100644
--- a/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-core2.inc
+++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-core2.inc
@@ -20,5 +20,5 @@  PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-core2-64 = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-x86-64} core2-64
 
 AVAILTUNES += "core2-64-x32"
 TUNE_FEATURES_tune-core2-64-x32 ?= "${TUNE_FEATURES_tune-x86-64-x32} core2"
-BASE_LIB_tune-core2-64-x32 ?= "lib"
+BASE_LIB_tune-core2-64-x32 ?= "libx32"
 PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-core2-64-x32 = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-x86-64-x32} core2-64-x32"

Comments

Phil Blundell Oct. 20, 2011, 9:02 a.m. 
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 00:50 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> From: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>

Why is this a good thing?  There is no explanation in the commit
message.

p.
Richard Purdie Oct. 20, 2011, 12:44 p.m. 
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 10:02 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 00:50 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> > From: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>
> 
> Why is this a good thing?  There is no explanation in the commit
> message.

Agreed, we need to improve the commit messages. I've merged this one
with some additional comments but can people please keep good commit
messages in mind.

Cheers,

Richard