Message ID | 20230225231717.3887902-1-denis@denix.org |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Resolve conflict between /usr/bin/hello from lmbench and mbedtls | expand |
On 25 Feb 2023, at 23:17, Denys Dmytriyenko via lists.openembedded.org <denis=denix.org@lists.openembedded.org> wrote: > > Both lmbench and mbedtls packages provide generically-named /usr/bin/hello > binary, which causes a conflict when trying to install them both into a > rootfs or SDK. Set up alternative providers to resolve the conflict. Are either of these binaries actually useful? The, well, alternative is to just delete them stupidly named binaries (or rename). Ross
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 11:05:36AM +0000, Ross Burton wrote: > On 25 Feb 2023, at 23:17, Denys Dmytriyenko via lists.openembedded.org <denis=denix.org@lists.openembedded.org> wrote: > > > > Both lmbench and mbedtls packages provide generically-named /usr/bin/hello > > binary, which causes a conflict when trying to install them both into a > > rootfs or SDK. Set up alternative providers to resolve the conflict. > > Are either of these binaries actually useful? The, well, alternative is to > just delete them stupidly named binaries (or rename). My assumption is that at least lmbench is using this binary for some testing or benchmarking. But I haven't looked very deep into it. Plus I wanted to get this backported to Kirkstone, so the least invasive approach made more sense.