Patchwork [CONSOLIDATED,PULL,0/4] 10-June

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Saul Wold
Date June 10, 2011, 6:26 a.m.
Message ID <cover.1307686598.git.sgw@linux.intel.com>
Download mbox
Permalink /patch/5621/
State New, archived
Headers show

Pull-request

git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib sgw/stage

Comments

Saul Wold - June 10, 2011, 6:26 a.m.
Richard,

This has the contiuation of the static library work (staticdev)
along with some community contribtions.

Thanks
	Sau!


The following changes since commit f183c7cfe377fa6ed2777605c3590a9dda2060df:

  native/nativesdk: Clean up the depends ordering after bitbake override handling updates (2011-06-09 22:48:56 +0100)

are available in the git repository at:
  git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib sgw/stage
  http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=sgw/stage

Kang Kai (1):
  ghostscript: update SRC_URI

Nitin A Kamble (1):
  gcc: rebase the patch to avoid patch rejection

Phil Blundell (1):
  busybox: backport distro-features handling from oe master

Saul Wold (1):
  multiple recipes converted to -staticdev packages

 meta/recipes-bsp/pciutils/pciutils_3.1.7.bb        |    7 +-
 .../wireless-tools/wireless-tools_29.bb            |    9 +-
 meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox.inc              |   80 +-
 meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox_1.18.4.bb        |    2 +-
 meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-package.inc        |    8 +-
 meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc_2.12.bb            |    2 +-
 meta/recipes-core/gettext/gettext_0.18.1.1.bb      |   16 +-
 meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-package.inc          |    9 +-
 meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc_2.10.1.bb            |    2 +-
 .../meta/external-csl-toolchain_2008q3-72.bb       |    8 +-
 meta/recipes-core/uclibc/uclibc.inc                |   10 +-
 meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-new.inc                |   14 +-
 meta/recipes-core/udev/udev_164.bb                 |    2 +-
 meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux.inc        |   11 +-
 meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux_2.19.1.bb  |    2 +-
 meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc        |    1 -
 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0.inc            |    2 +-
 ...-de.po-el.po-es.po-fi.po-fr.po-id.po-ja.p.patch |161900 +-------------------
 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-package-runtime.inc  |   24 +-
 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc_4.6.0.bb          |    2 +-
 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_0.1.8.bb           |    8 +-
 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_svn.bb             |    8 +-
 meta/recipes-devtools/python/python_2.6.6.bb       |    2 -
 meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.0.bb             |   18 +-
 meta/recipes-extended/augeas/augeas.inc            |    4 +-
 meta/recipes-extended/augeas/augeas_0.8.1.bb       |    2 +-
 meta/recipes-extended/gamin/gamin_0.1.10.bb        |    9 +-
 .../ghostscript/ghostscript_9.02.bb                |    7 +-
 .../tcp-wrappers/tcp-wrappers_7.6.bb               |    9 +-
 meta/recipes-graphics/cairo/cairo_1.10.2.bb        |    9 +-
 meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libxft_2.2.0.bb     |    7 +-
 meta/recipes-multimedia/liba52/liba52_0.7.4.bb     |    5 +-
 meta/recipes-support/attr/acl_2.2.51.bb            |    2 +-
 meta/recipes-support/attr/attr_2.4.46.bb           |    2 +-
 meta/recipes-support/attr/ea-acl.inc               |    8 +-
 meta/recipes-support/curl/curl_7.21.6.bb           |    8 +-
 meta/recipes-support/sqlite/sqlite3.inc            |    7 +-
 meta/recipes-support/sqlite/sqlite3_3.7.6.2.bb     |    2 +-
 38 files changed, 2605 insertions(+), 159623 deletions(-)
Richard Purdie - June 10, 2011, 4:33 p.m.
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 23:26 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> Kang Kai (1):
>   ghostscript: update SRC_URI
> 
> Nitin A Kamble (1):
>   gcc: rebase the patch to avoid patch rejection

This was a disaster. It breaks the build and is huge, thereby clogging
up the source control system web interface etc.

I applied it, then had to revert it. Please test things like this more
carefully in future.

I also think we need to put these kind of patches on the website or in a
repo, we shouldn't be carrying them around in the main repo.

> Phil Blundell (1):
>   busybox: backport distro-features handling from oe master
> 
> Saul Wold (1):
>   multiple recipes converted to -staticdev packages

I'm with Phil on this one, needs more work.

I haven't got to the other two since the gcc issue distracted me :/.

Cheers,

Richard
Saul Wold - June 10, 2011, 4:54 p.m.
On 06/10/2011 09:33 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 23:26 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
>> Kang Kai (1):
>>    ghostscript: update SRC_URI
>>
>> Nitin A Kamble (1):
>>    gcc: rebase the patch to avoid patch rejection
>
> This was a disaster. It breaks the build and is huge, thereby clogging
> up the source control system web interface etc.
>
> I applied it, then had to revert it. Please test things like this more
> carefully in future.
>
> I also think we need to put these kind of patches on the website or in a
> repo, we shouldn't be carrying them around in the main repo.
>
>> Phil Blundell (1):
>>    busybox: backport distro-features handling from oe master
>>
>> Saul Wold (1):
>>    multiple recipes converted to -staticdev packages
>
> I'm with Phil on this one, needs more work.
>
Sorry about this one, I thought I had it further along, I guess I had a
cut and paste failure (dropping the R from RDEPENDS).
> I haven't got to the other two since the gcc issue distracted me :/.
>
I did run multiple builds without failure, so I am not sure what 
happened with the gcc failure.

Sau!

> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
Koen Kooi - June 10, 2011, 4:59 p.m.
Op 10 jun 2011, om 18:33 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:

> On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 23:26 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
>> Kang Kai (1):
>>  ghostscript: update SRC_URI
>> 
>> Nitin A Kamble (1):
>>  gcc: rebase the patch to avoid patch rejection
> 
> This was a disaster. It breaks the build and is huge, thereby clogging
> up the source control system web interface etc.
> 
> I applied it, then had to revert it. Please test things like this more
> carefully in future.
> 
> I also think we need to put these kind of patches on the website or in a
> repo, we shouldn't be carrying them around in the main repo.

Having patches external to the layer is a recipe for failure, if you excude the pun. I've had to deal with patches disappearing/changing/etc a lot during the past months in the .dev world and I don't look forward to continuing those mistakes in the oe-core world.

regards,

Koen