Patchwork [meta-fsl-arm] linux-imx_3.0.35.bb: Update to top of tree

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Fabio Estevam
Date April 22, 2013, 2:45 a.m.
Message ID <1366598709-25282-1-git-send-email-festevam@gmail.com>
Download mbox | patch
Permalink /patch/48599/
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: Otavio Salvador
Headers show

Comments

Fabio Estevam - April 22, 2013, 2:45 a.m.
From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>

There are two important commits missing in this branch currently.

Update to the top of tree.

Reported-by: Rogerio Nunes <rogerio.nunes@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
---
 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx_3.0.35.bb |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Otavio Salvador - April 22, 2013, 12:10 p.m.
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
>
> There are two important commits missing in this branch currently.
>
> Update to the top of tree.
>
> Reported-by: Rogerio Nunes <rogerio.nunes@freescale.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>

Could you reword the commit log for:

* make clear you're updating 1.1.0 branch
* change the comment to not say 'tag' in the recipe
* use 'linux (3.0.35): ...' as shortlog prefix, not  the bbfile

Regards,

--
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
E-mail: otavio@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
John Weber - April 22, 2013, 12:51 p.m.
Also technically is this not rev 1.1.1 instead of 1.1.0?

On Monday, April 22, 2013, Otavio Salvador wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> > From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com <javascript:;>>
> >
> > There are two important commits missing in this branch currently.
> >
> > Update to the top of tree.
> >
> > Reported-by: Rogerio Nunes <rogerio.nunes@freescale.com <javascript:;>>
> > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com <javascript:;>
> >
>
> Could you reword the commit log for:
>
> * make clear you're updating 1.1.0 branch
> * change the comment to not say 'tag' in the recipe
> * use 'linux (3.0.35): ...' as shortlog prefix, not  the bbfile
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
> E-mail: otavio@ossystems.com.br <javascript:;>
> http://www.ossystems.com.br
> Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
> _______________________________________________
> meta-freescale mailing list
> meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org <javascript:;>
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
>
Daiane Angolini - April 22, 2013, 1:01 p.m.
On 04/22/2013 09:51 AM, John Weber wrote:
> Also technically is this not rev 1.1.1 instead of 1.1.0?

We try to follow the Freescale version. So, it's still 1.1.0 
branch/version/tag/whatever


Daiane
John Weber - April 22, 2013, 1:04 p.m.
Yes it is confusing. Because the branch/tag is moving with successive
commits.

On Monday, April 22, 2013, Daiane Angolini wrote:

> On 04/22/2013 09:51 AM, John Weber wrote:
>
>> Also technically is this not rev 1.1.1 instead of 1.1.0?
>>
>
> We try to follow the Freescale version. So, it's still 1.1.0
> branch/version/tag/whatever
>
>
> Daiane
>
>
Fabio Estevam - April 22, 2013, 2:20 p.m.
Hi John,

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:04 AM, John Weber <rjohnweber@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes it is confusing. Because the branch/tag is moving with successive
> commits.

git.freescale.com has just been updated:

http://git.freescale.com/git/cgit.cgi/imx/linux-2.6-imx.git/log/?h=imx_3.0.35_1.1.0

Just sent a patch to update to the latest commit.
Rogerio Nunes - April 22, 2013, 3:39 p.m.
One correction on my initial comment:

LDO and TEMP: patches available now at git.freescale.com as Fabio reported.
PFD: uboot only (no kernel patch for this one)


On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:04 AM, John Weber <rjohnweber@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yes it is confusing. Because the branch/tag is moving with successive
> > commits.
>
> git.freescale.com has just been updated:
>
>
> http://git.freescale.com/git/cgit.cgi/imx/linux-2.6-imx.git/log/?h=imx_3.0.35_1.1.0
>
> Just sent a patch to update to the latest commit.
> _______________________________________________
> meta-freescale mailing list
> meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
>

Patch

diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx_3.0.35.bb b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx_3.0.35.bb
index 20681ac..4517e78 100644
--- a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx_3.0.35.bb
+++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx_3.0.35.bb
@@ -3,12 +3,12 @@ 
 
 include linux-imx.inc
 
-PR = "${INC_PR}.12"
+PR = "${INC_PR}.13"
 
 COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(mx6)"
 
 # Revision of 1.1.0 tag
-SRCREV = "c27cb3851bb6f822f8a92e4a1e10fba19284bdd4"
+SRCREV = "64eb436e9876a2d95abea34464addf37a0888f61"
 LOCALVERSION = "-1.1.0+yocto"
 
 # Revision of 12.10.02 tag