Patchwork [meta-fsl-arm-extra,v2,2/2] Add wandboard dual machine conf

This patch adds conf/machine file for Wandboard Dual to meta-fsl-arm-extra.

Upstream-Status: Submitted [meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org]

Changes since v1:
        Added description
        Added upstream-status 
        Reversed the patch order 

Signed-off-by: John Weber <rjohnweber@gmail.com>
---
 conf/machine/wandboard-dual.conf |   20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 conf/machine/wandboard-dual.conf

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:55 AM, John Weber <rjohnweber@gmail.com> wrote:
> This patch adds conf/machine file for Wandboard Dual to meta-fsl-arm-extra.
>
> Upstream-Status: Submitted [meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org]

Not need as it has no patch files.

> Changes since v1:
>         Added description
>         Added upstream-status
>         Reversed the patch order

Bellow --- line

> Signed-off-by: John Weber <rjohnweber@gmail.com>

Another doubt, you seem to not have send the kernel as well; the board
will be useless without a kernel ;-)

Hi Otavio,

Le Wed, 20 Feb 2013 03:22:42 -0300,
Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> a écrit :

> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:55 AM, John Weber <rjohnweber@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This patch adds conf/machine file for Wandboard Dual to meta-fsl-arm-extra.
> >
> > Upstream-Status: Submitted [meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org]
> 
> Not need as it has no patch files.
> 
> > Changes since v1:
> >         Added description
> >         Added upstream-status
> >         Reversed the patch order
> 
> Bellow --- line
> 
> > Signed-off-by: John Weber <rjohnweber@gmail.com>
> 
> Another doubt, you seem to not have send the kernel as well; the board
> will be useless without a kernel ;-)
> 
being able to generate a working bootloader is a good first step before
trying to load the kernel so yes that's useful ;-)

Eric

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Eric Bénard <eric@eukrea.com> wrote:
> Hi Otavio,
>
> Le Wed, 20 Feb 2013 03:22:42 -0300,
> Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> a écrit :
>
>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:55 AM, John Weber <rjohnweber@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > This patch adds conf/machine file for Wandboard Dual to meta-fsl-arm-extra.
>> >
>> > Upstream-Status: Submitted [meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org]
>>
>> Not need as it has no patch files.
>>
>> > Changes since v1:
>> >         Added description
>> >         Added upstream-status
>> >         Reversed the patch order
>>
>> Bellow --- line
>>
>> > Signed-off-by: John Weber <rjohnweber@gmail.com>
>>
>> Another doubt, you seem to not have send the kernel as well; the board
>> will be useless without a kernel ;-)
>>
> being able to generate a working bootloader is a good first step before
> trying to load the kernel so yes that's useful ;-)

hehe; sure! I fully agree but for Yocto usually people expects
something which boots heheh :-) I think he has forgot to send it with
the patchset :-)

All - I apologize for the newbie problems here and for spamming everyone's
inbox.  My intent was to share this so that people could start testing it
if they so desire.  I am working on the kernel.

When I have the kernel done I'll submit it all.  Having some issues right
now with the iomux in the code.


On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:40 AM, Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Eric Bénard <eric@eukrea.com> wrote:
> > Hi Otavio,
> >
> > Le Wed, 20 Feb 2013 03:22:42 -0300,
> > Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> a écrit :
> >
> >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:55 AM, John Weber <rjohnweber@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > This patch adds conf/machine file for Wandboard Dual to
> meta-fsl-arm-extra.
> >> >
> >> > Upstream-Status: Submitted [meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org]
> >>
> >> Not need as it has no patch files.
> >>
> >> > Changes since v1:
> >> >         Added description
> >> >         Added upstream-status
> >> >         Reversed the patch order
> >>
> >> Bellow --- line
> >>
> >> > Signed-off-by: John Weber <rjohnweber@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> Another doubt, you seem to not have send the kernel as well; the board
> >> will be useless without a kernel ;-)
> >>
> > being able to generate a working bootloader is a good first step before
> > trying to load the kernel so yes that's useful ;-)
>
> hehe; sure! I fully agree but for Yocto usually people expects
> something which boots heheh :-) I think he has forgot to send it with
> the patchset :-)
>
> --
> Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
> E-mail: otavio@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
> Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
>

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:09 PM, John Weber <rjohnweber@gmail.com> wrote:
> All - I apologize for the newbie problems here and for spamming everyone's
> inbox.  My intent was to share this so that people could start testing it if
> they so desire.  I am working on the kernel.

Hey, you don't need to apoligize ... it is a learning process :-)

> When I have the kernel done I'll submit it all.  Having some issues right
> now with the iomux in the code.

Awesome; bear on mind that our kernel is based in 1.1.0 release so you
should port their board files and changes to it.

Hi Otavio,

Is the right way to do this (get 1.1.0 kernel) to discard danny and repo
init -u <fsl community bsp platform> -b master?

John


On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Otavio Salvador
<otavio@ossystems.com.br>wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:09 PM, John Weber <rjohnweber@gmail.com> wrote:
> > All - I apologize for the newbie problems here and for spamming
> everyone's
> > inbox.  My intent was to share this so that people could start testing
> it if
> > they so desire.  I am working on the kernel.
>
> Hey, you don't need to apoligize ... it is a learning process :-)
>
> > When I have the kernel done I'll submit it all.  Having some issues right
> > now with the iomux in the code.
>
> Awesome; bear on mind that our kernel is based in 1.1.0 release so you
> should port their board files and changes to it.
>
> --
> Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
> E-mail: otavio@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
> Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
>

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:19 AM, John Weber <rjohnweber@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Otavio,
>
> Is the right way to do this (get 1.1.0 kernel) to discard danny and repo
> init -u <fsl community bsp platform> -b master?

You should work in master as this is new feature. We may want to
backport it to danny later but first master.

Le Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:52:38 -0300,
Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> a écrit :

> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:19 AM, John Weber <rjohnweber@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Otavio,
> >
> > Is the right way to do this (get 1.1.0 kernel) to discard danny and repo
> > init -u <fsl community bsp platform> -b master?
> 
> You should work in master as this is new feature. We may want to
> backport it to danny later but first master.
> 
you could also create the recipe for the kernel version actually
provided by the manufacturer on the wandboard so that first we get
a working version and then we can think to upgrade it to the latest.

Eric