| Submitter | Richard Purdie |
|---|---|
| Date | Dec. 14, 2012, 4:25 p.m. |
| Message ID | <1355502352.32519.28.camel@ted> |
| Download | mbox | patch |
| Permalink | /patch/41027/ |
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
Comments
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Richard Purdie < richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Currently, calling a shell function using exec_func may result in > dependent functions being missing, if the shell parser can't detect > the dependency, even if it was specified with the vardeps flag. > > This patch ensures the function looks at the flag and considers it > when deciding which other functions need to be output. > > [YOCTO #3561] > > Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> > Looks reasonable to me, thanks. Acked-by: Christopher Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Patch
diff --git a/bitbake/lib/bb/data.py b/bitbake/lib/bb/data.py index dc5a425..478a482 100644 --- a/bitbake/lib/bb/data.py +++ b/bitbake/lib/bb/data.py @@ -260,6 +260,7 @@ def emit_func(func, o=sys.__stdout__, d = init()): emit_var(func, o, d, False) and o.write('\n') newdeps = bb.codeparser.ShellParser(func, logger).parse_shell(d.getVar(func, True)) + newdeps |= set((d.getVarFlag(func, "vardeps", True) or "").split()) seen = set() while newdeps: deps = newdeps
Currently, calling a shell function using exec_func may result in dependent functions being missing, if the shell parser can't detect the dependency, even if it was specified with the vardeps flag. This patch ensures the function looks at the flag and considers it when deciding which other functions need to be output. [YOCTO #3561] Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> ---