| Submitter | Khem Raj |
|---|---|
| Date | Nov. 28, 2012, 3:29 p.m. |
| Message ID | <cover.1354116375.git.raj.khem@gmail.com> |
| Download | mbox |
| Permalink | /patch/39797/ |
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
Pull-request
git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib kraj/binutils-2.23Comments
W dniu 28.11.2012 16:29, Khem Raj pisze: > This patchset updates binutils to 2.23 branch I have tested systemd-image > meta-toolchain and core-image-sato target with it they all built fine > I did not (yet) delete the 2.22 recipes since there must be some time > given for folks to try 2.23 in couple of weeks 2.22 recipes will move > out of OE-Core. Preferably deleted if need be moved into toolchain-layer I did builds for AArch64 with 2.23 and they were working fine. Will do 2.23.1 build as well. Acked-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org>
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz < marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org> wrote: > W dniu 28.11.2012 16:29, Khem Raj pisze: > > This patchset updates binutils to 2.23 branch I have tested systemd-image > > meta-toolchain and core-image-sato target with it they all built fine > > I did not (yet) delete the 2.22 recipes since there must be some time > > given for folks to try 2.23 in couple of weeks 2.22 recipes will move > > out of OE-Core. Preferably deleted if need be moved into toolchain-layer > > I did builds for AArch64 with 2.23 and they were working fine. Will do > 2.23.1 build as well. > thanks. let me know of any fallouts. > > Acked-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org> > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >
Hello There is an annoying change in binutils/bfd which now wants autoconf generated config.h so basically any package depending on binutils-dev and using bfd.h now needs to adapt to this change. I have fixed oprofile for this and pushed refreshed patches to pull branch. You can fix rest of packages modeling the oprofile fix or let me know of the failing package I will help out. Thanks -Khem On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: > This patchset updates binutils to 2.23 branch I have tested systemd-image > meta-toolchain and core-image-sato target with it they all built fine > I did not (yet) delete the 2.22 recipes since there must be some time > given for folks to try 2.23 in couple of weeks 2.22 recipes will move > out of OE-Core. Preferably deleted if need be moved into toolchain-layer > > > The following changes since commit > bdce08215396e5ab99ada5fa0f62c3b002a44582: > > openssh: CVE-2011-4327 (2012-11-28 07:38:26 +0000) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib kraj/binutils-2.23 > > http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kraj/binutils-2.23 > > Khem Raj (3): > binutils-2.23.1: Add recipes > oprofile: Define PACKAGE and PACKAGE_VERSION > tcmode-default.inc: Use binutils 2.23.1 > > meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc | 2 +- > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.1.inc | 46 + > .../binutils-2.23.1/backport/0001-bfd.patch | 58 + > ...3-Assemble-all-sources-files-in-each-test.patch | 187 + > .../binutils-2.23.1/backport/0005-bfd.patch | 103 + > .../backport/0010-bfd-ChangeLog.patch | 95 + > ...012-Fix-TLS-LD-to-LE-optimization-for-x32.patch | 57 + > .../backport/0013-gas-ChangeLog.patch | 43 + > .../0014-Fix-opcode-for-64-bit-jecxz.patch | 112 + > ...-data.exp-Add-XFAIL-for-arm-targets-refer.patch | 40 + > .../binutils-2.23.1/backport/0018-bfd.patch | 78 + > .../binutils-2.23.1/backport/0024-bfd.patch | 49 + > .../backport/0026-ld-testsuite.patch | 65 + > .../binutils/binutils-2.23.1/binutils-armv5e.patch | 25 + > .../binutils/binutils-2.23.1/binutils-poison.patch | 259 + > .../binutils-uclibc-100-uclibc-conf.patch | 40 + > ...binutils-uclibc-300-001_ld_makefile_patch.patch | 55 + > ...binutils-uclibc-300-006_better_file_error.patch | 45 + > ...ils-uclibc-300-012_check_ldrunpath_length.patch | 49 + > .../binutils-uclibc-gas-needs-libm.patch | 38 + > .../binutils-x86_64_i386_biarch.patch | 29 + > .../binutils-2.23.1/libiberty_path_fix.patch | 22 + > .../binutils-2.23.1/libtool-2.4-update.patch |19407 > ++++++++++++++++++++ > .../binutils-2.23.1/libtool-rpath-fix.patch | 39 + > .../mips64-default-ld-emulation.patch | 49 + > .../binutils/binutils-2.23.1/relocatable_sdk.patch | 49 + > .../binutils/binutils-cross-canadian_2.23.1.bb | 3 + > .../binutils/binutils-cross_2.23.1.bb | 3 + > .../binutils/binutils-crosssdk_2.23.1.bb | 14 + > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils_2.23.1.bb | 35 + > meta/recipes-kernel/oprofile/oprofile.inc | 4 +- > 31 files changed, 21097 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.1.inc > create mode 100644 > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.1/backport/0001-bfd.patch > create mode 100644 > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.1/backport/0003-Assemble-all-sources-files-in-each-test.patch > create mode 100644 > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.1/backport/0005-bfd.patch > create mode 100644 > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.1/backport/0010-bfd-ChangeLog.patch > create mode 100644 > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.1/backport/0012-Fix-TLS-LD-to-LE-optimization-for-x32.patch > create mode 100644 > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.1/backport/0013-gas-ChangeLog.patch > create mode 100644 > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.1/backport/0014-Fix-opcode-for-64-bit-jecxz.patch > create mode 100644 > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.1/backport/0017-ld-elf-comm-data.exp-Add-XFAIL-for-arm-targets-refer.patch > create mode 100644 > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.1/backport/0018-bfd.patch > create mode 100644 > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.1/backport/0024-bfd.patch > create mode 100644 > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.1/backport/0026-ld-testsuite.patch > create mode 100644 > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.1/binutils-armv5e.patch > create mode 100644 > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.1/binutils-poison.patch > create mode 100644 > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.1/binutils-uclibc-100-uclibc-conf.patch > create mode 100644 > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.1/binutils-uclibc-300-001_ld_makefile_patch.patch > create mode 100644 > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.1/binutils-uclibc-300-006_better_file_error.patch > create mode 100644 > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.1/binutils-uclibc-300-012_check_ldrunpath_length.patch > create mode 100644 > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.1/binutils-uclibc-gas-needs-libm.patch > create mode 100644 > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.1/binutils-x86_64_i386_biarch.patch > create mode 100644 > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.1/libiberty_path_fix.patch > create mode 100644 > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.1/libtool-2.4-update.patch > create mode 100644 > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.1/libtool-rpath-fix.patch > create mode 100644 > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.1/mips64-default-ld-emulation.patch > create mode 100644 > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.1/relocatable_sdk.patch > create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/ > binutils-cross-canadian_2.23.1.bb > create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/ > binutils-cross_2.23.1.bb > create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/ > binutils-crosssdk_2.23.1.bb > create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils_2.23.1.bb > > -- > 1.7.9.5 > >
W dniu 28.11.2012 18:43, Khem Raj pisze: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz > I did builds for AArch64 with 2.23 and they were working fine. Will do > 2.23.1 build as well. > > thanks. let me know of any fallouts. Due to some updates I had to move to trunk again.
can you point out ? is it branch issue or some patch that I dropped On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz < marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org> wrote: > W dniu 28.11.2012 18:43, Khem Raj pisze: > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz > > > I did builds for AArch64 with 2.23 and they were working fine. Will > do > > 2.23.1 build as well. > > > > thanks. let me know of any fallouts. > > Due to some updates I had to move to trunk again. >
W dniu 04.12.2012 20:48, Khem Raj pisze: > can you point out ? > is it branch issue or some patch that I dropped There were some updates in binutils trunk from ARM people and we need those to get gdb trunk running as well. Maybe in January I will have more time to take a look at it and merge them in 2.23.1 recipe. So nothing related to your updates.