| Submitter | Colin Walters |
|---|---|
| Date | Sept. 24, 2012, 11:54 p.m. |
| Message ID | <1348530882.25427.1.camel@lenny> |
| Download | mbox | patch |
| Permalink | /patch/37151/ |
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
Comments
On 25 September 2012 00:54, Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org> wrote: > So packagegroup-core-buildessential is intended to be similar to > Debian's "build-essential" package. It's the stuff needed by say 80+% > of components, not worth repeating over and over. Makes sense to me. Ross
On 09/24/2012 04:54 PM, Colin Walters wrote: > [Not heavily tested, but sent for discussion] > > task-core-sdk is too big - for example, I simply don't want to ship tcl, ever =) > Historically distcc caused a large dependency graph explosion because it has > a utility which uses gtk+, although that was fixed. > > packagegroup-core-sdk also includes coreutils, which is a bit > confusing; conceptually things dependent on coreutils should pull it > in explicitly, or possibly we just declare coreutils to be in the > minimal build set. > > So packagegroup-core-buildessential is intended to be similar to > Debian's "build-essential" package. It's the stuff needed by say 80+% > of components, not worth repeating over and over. > > Signed-off-by: Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org> > --- > .../packagegroup-core-buildessential.bb | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > .../packagegroups/packagegroup-core-sdk.bb | 17 +----------- > 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-buildessential.bb > > Merged into OE-Core Thanks Sau! > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >
Patch
From 80a199a2fd34cca08324f228fc1272086a476e61 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:46:01 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Add packagegroup-core-buildessential task-core-sdk is too big - for example, I simply don't want to ship tcl, ever =) Historically distcc caused a large dependency graph explosion because it has a utility which uses gtk+, although that was fixed. packagegroup-core-sdk also includes coreutils, which is a bit confusing; conceptually things dependent on coreutils should pull it in explicitly, or possibly we just declare coreutils to be in the minimal build set. So packagegroup-core-buildessential is intended to be similar to Debian's "build-essential" package. It's the stuff needed by say 80+% of components, not worth repeating over and over. Signed-off-by: Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org> --- .../packagegroup-core-buildessential.bb | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++ .../packagegroups/packagegroup-core-sdk.bb | 17 +----------- 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-buildessential.bb diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-buildessential.bb b/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-buildessential.bb new file mode 100644 index 0000000..164da36 --- /dev/null +++ b/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-buildessential.bb @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +# +# Copyright (C) 2007 OpenedHand Ltd. +# Copyright (C) 2012 Red Hat, Inc. +# + +SUMMARY = "Essential build dependencies" +LICENSE = "MIT" +PR = "r0" + +inherit packagegroup + +RDEPENDS_packagegroup-core-buildessential = "\ + autoconf \ + automake \ + binutils \ + binutils-symlinks \ + cpp \ + cpp-symlinks \ + gcc \ + gcc-symlinks \ + g++ \ + g++-symlinks \ + gettext \ + make \ + libstdc++ \ + libstdc++-dev \ + libtool \ + pkgconfig \ + " + diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-sdk.bb b/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-sdk.bb index b00bf07..985bebd 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-sdk.bb +++ b/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-sdk.bb @@ -16,28 +16,13 @@ RREPLACES_packagegroup-core-sdk = "task-core-sdk" RCONFLICTS_packagegroup-core-sdk = "task-core-sdk" RDEPENDS_packagegroup-core-sdk = "\ - autoconf \ - automake \ - binutils \ - binutils-symlinks \ + packagegroup-core-buildessential \ coreutils \ - cpp \ - cpp-symlinks \ ccache \ diffutils \ - gcc \ - gcc-symlinks \ - g++ \ - g++-symlinks \ - gettext \ - make \ intltool \ - libstdc++ \ - libstdc++-dev \ - libtool \ perl-module-re \ perl-module-text-wrap \ - pkgconfig \ findutils \ quilt \ less \ -- 1.7.11.4
[Not heavily tested, but sent for discussion] task-core-sdk is too big - for example, I simply don't want to ship tcl, ever =) Historically distcc caused a large dependency graph explosion because it has a utility which uses gtk+, although that was fixed. packagegroup-core-sdk also includes coreutils, which is a bit confusing; conceptually things dependent on coreutils should pull it in explicitly, or possibly we just declare coreutils to be in the minimal build set. So packagegroup-core-buildessential is intended to be similar to Debian's "build-essential" package. It's the stuff needed by say 80+% of components, not worth repeating over and over. Signed-off-by: Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org> --- .../packagegroup-core-buildessential.bb | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++ .../packagegroups/packagegroup-core-sdk.bb | 17 +----------- 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-buildessential.bb