Patchwork Add packagegroup-core-buildessential

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Colin Walters
Date Sept. 24, 2012, 11:54 p.m.
Message ID <1348530882.25427.1.camel@lenny>
Download mbox | patch
Permalink /patch/37151/
State New
Headers show

Comments

Colin Walters - Sept. 24, 2012, 11:54 p.m.
[Not heavily tested, but sent for discussion]

task-core-sdk is too big - for example, I simply don't want to ship tcl, ever =)
Historically distcc caused a large dependency graph explosion because it has
a utility which uses gtk+, although that was fixed.

packagegroup-core-sdk also includes coreutils, which is a bit
confusing; conceptually things dependent on coreutils should pull it
in explicitly, or possibly we just declare coreutils to be in the
minimal build set.

So packagegroup-core-buildessential is intended to be similar to
Debian's "build-essential" package.  It's the stuff needed by say 80+%
of components, not worth repeating over and over.

Signed-off-by: Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org>
---
 .../packagegroup-core-buildessential.bb            | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 .../packagegroups/packagegroup-core-sdk.bb         | 17 +-----------
 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-buildessential.bb
Ross Burton - Sept. 25, 2012, 9:37 a.m.
On 25 September 2012 00:54, Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org> wrote:
> So packagegroup-core-buildessential is intended to be similar to
> Debian's "build-essential" package.  It's the stuff needed by say 80+%
> of components, not worth repeating over and over.

Makes sense to me.

Ross
Saul Wold - Oct. 18, 2012, 7:50 p.m.
On 09/24/2012 04:54 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> [Not heavily tested, but sent for discussion]
>
> task-core-sdk is too big - for example, I simply don't want to ship tcl, ever =)
> Historically distcc caused a large dependency graph explosion because it has
> a utility which uses gtk+, although that was fixed.
>
> packagegroup-core-sdk also includes coreutils, which is a bit
> confusing; conceptually things dependent on coreutils should pull it
> in explicitly, or possibly we just declare coreutils to be in the
> minimal build set.
>
> So packagegroup-core-buildessential is intended to be similar to
> Debian's "build-essential" package.  It's the stuff needed by say 80+%
> of components, not worth repeating over and over.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org>
> ---
>   .../packagegroup-core-buildessential.bb            | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>   .../packagegroups/packagegroup-core-sdk.bb         | 17 +-----------
>   2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-buildessential.bb
>
>
Merged into OE-Core

Thanks
	Sau!

>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>

Patch

From 80a199a2fd34cca08324f228fc1272086a476e61 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:46:01 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Add packagegroup-core-buildessential

task-core-sdk is too big - for example, I simply don't want to ship tcl, ever =)
Historically distcc caused a large dependency graph explosion because it has
a utility which uses gtk+, although that was fixed.

packagegroup-core-sdk also includes coreutils, which is a bit
confusing; conceptually things dependent on coreutils should pull it
in explicitly, or possibly we just declare coreutils to be in the
minimal build set.

So packagegroup-core-buildessential is intended to be similar to
Debian's "build-essential" package.  It's the stuff needed by say 80+%
of components, not worth repeating over and over.

Signed-off-by: Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org>
---
 .../packagegroup-core-buildessential.bb            | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 .../packagegroups/packagegroup-core-sdk.bb         | 17 +-----------
 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-buildessential.bb

diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-buildessential.bb b/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-buildessential.bb
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..164da36
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-buildessential.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ 
+#
+# Copyright (C) 2007 OpenedHand Ltd.
+# Copyright (C) 2012 Red Hat, Inc.
+#
+
+SUMMARY = "Essential build dependencies"
+LICENSE = "MIT"
+PR = "r0"
+
+inherit packagegroup
+
+RDEPENDS_packagegroup-core-buildessential = "\
+    autoconf \
+    automake \
+    binutils \
+    binutils-symlinks \
+    cpp \
+    cpp-symlinks \
+    gcc \
+    gcc-symlinks \
+    g++ \
+    g++-symlinks \
+    gettext \
+    make \
+    libstdc++ \
+    libstdc++-dev \
+    libtool \
+    pkgconfig \
+    "
+
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-sdk.bb b/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-sdk.bb
index b00bf07..985bebd 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-sdk.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-sdk.bb
@@ -16,28 +16,13 @@  RREPLACES_packagegroup-core-sdk = "task-core-sdk"
 RCONFLICTS_packagegroup-core-sdk = "task-core-sdk"
 
 RDEPENDS_packagegroup-core-sdk = "\
-    autoconf \
-    automake \
-    binutils \
-    binutils-symlinks \
+    packagegroup-core-buildessential \
     coreutils \
-    cpp \
-    cpp-symlinks \
     ccache \
     diffutils \
-    gcc \
-    gcc-symlinks \
-    g++ \
-    g++-symlinks \
-    gettext \
-    make \
     intltool \
-    libstdc++ \
-    libstdc++-dev \
-    libtool \
     perl-module-re \
     perl-module-text-wrap \
-    pkgconfig \
     findutils \
     quilt \
     less \
-- 
1.7.11.4