| Submitter | Richard Purdie |
|---|---|
| Date | Sept. 21, 2012, 2:24 p.m. |
| Message ID | <1348237488.10108.83.camel@ted> |
| Download | mbox | patch |
| Permalink | /patch/36999/ |
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
Comments
On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 15:24 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > As per the previous patch, this is really a request for comments, I can > see pros and cons... I've been using this configuration locally for quite some time (it's needed for rm_old_works in particular) and it seems to be an improvement in general. p.
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 03:27:48PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 15:24 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > As per the previous patch, this is really a request for comments, I can > > see pros and cons... > > I've been using this configuration locally for quite some time (it's > needed for rm_old_works in particular) and it seems to be an improvement > in general. Last time I was using rm_old_works without this change https://github.com/shr-distribution/meta-smartphone/commit/0d4c17de1ba7343d82bb10c311754e29d573c485 I've seen a lot of /usr/src/debug/${EXTENDPE}${PV}-${PR}" on target from -dbg packages, which doesn't look right, was this fixed in whatever packs source code to -dbg packages? Cheers,
On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 17:18 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 03:27:48PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 15:24 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > As per the previous patch, this is really a request for comments, I can > > > see pros and cons... > > > > I've been using this configuration locally for quite some time (it's > > needed for rm_old_works in particular) and it seems to be an improvement > > in general. > > Last time I was using rm_old_works without this change > https://github.com/shr-distribution/meta-smartphone/commit/0d4c17de1ba7343d82bb10c311754e29d573c485 > > I've seen a lot of /usr/src/debug/${EXTENDPE}${PV}-${PR}" on target from > -dbg packages, which doesn't look right, was this fixed in whatever packs > source code to -dbg packages? Probably from the way splitfile2 works in package.bbclass. I think this should be using ${PF} explicitly if that is what it wants... Cheers, Richard
Patch
diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf index 4b6fdb7..bc870e7 100644 --- a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf +++ b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ HGDIR = "${CO_DIR}/hg" STAMP = "${TMPDIR}/stamps/${MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS}/${PN}/${EXTENDPE}${PV}-${PR}" STAMPCLEAN = "${TMPDIR}/stamps/${MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS}/${PN}/*-*" -WORKDIR = "${TMPDIR}/work/${MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS}/${PF}" +WORKDIR = "${TMPDIR}/work/${MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS}/${PN}/${EXTENDPE}${PV}-${PR}" T = "${WORKDIR}/temp" D = "${WORKDIR}/image" S = "${WORKDIR}/${BP}"
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> --- As per the previous patch, this is really a request for comments, I can see pros and cons...