| Submitter | Saul Wold |
|---|---|
| Date | May 10, 2011, 5:26 a.m. |
| Message ID | <2a89d3090044d90208c608d5f05511c03a7ca48e.1305004776.git.sgw@linux.intel.com> |
| Download | mbox | patch |
| Permalink | /patch/3599/ |
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Comments
On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 22:26 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > From: Adrian Alonso <aalonso@secretlab.ca> > > * Readline new recipe version 6.2 > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Alonso <aalonso@secretlab.ca> > --- > meta/recipes-core/readline/readline_6.2.bb | 6 ++++++ > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/readline/readline_6.2.bb Why is readline 6.1 being kept? Cheers, Richard
Unaware of delete recipe policy, there is also a recipe of readline version 5.2 should also be removed? Send to list a patch that deletes recipe readline-6.1.bb Regards On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Richard Purdie < richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 22:26 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > > From: Adrian Alonso <aalonso@secretlab.ca> > > > > * Readline new recipe version 6.2 > > > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Alonso <aalonso@secretlab.ca> > > --- > > meta/recipes-core/readline/readline_6.2.bb | 6 ++++++ > > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/readline/readline_6.2.bb > > Why is readline 6.1 being kept? > > Cheers, > > Richard > >
On 5/10/11 9:53 AM, Adrian Alonso wrote: > Unaware of delete recipe policy, there is also a recipe of readline version > 5.2 > should also be removed? > > Send to list a patch that deletes recipe readline-6.1.bb There are two versions listed. A GPLv2 and a GPLv3 version. We're attempting to preserve the last GPLv2 versions for a base set of recipes to enable people who have specific license restrictions on their devices. So updating 6.1 -> 6.2 (and removing 6.1) is definitely policy -- unless there are components that have hard requirements on 6.1... The GPLv2 version should remain for the time being. --Mark > Regards > > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Richard Purdie < > richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > >> On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 22:26 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: >>> From: Adrian Alonso <aalonso@secretlab.ca> >>> >>> * Readline new recipe version 6.2 >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Adrian Alonso <aalonso@secretlab.ca> >>> --- >>> meta/recipes-core/readline/readline_6.2.bb | 6 ++++++ >>> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/readline/readline_6.2.bb >> >> Why is readline 6.1 being kept? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Richard >> >> > >
Patch
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/readline/readline_6.2.bb b/meta/recipes-core/readline/readline_6.2.bb new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5e32bb5 --- /dev/null +++ b/meta/recipes-core/readline/readline_6.2.bb @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +require readline.inc + +PR = "r0" + +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "67948acb2ca081f23359d0256e9a271c" +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "79a696070a058c233c72dd6ac697021cc64abd5ed51e59db867d66d196a89381"