Patchwork [13/30] readline: update version

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Saul Wold
Date May 10, 2011, 5:26 a.m.
Message ID <2a89d3090044d90208c608d5f05511c03a7ca48e.1305004776.git.sgw@linux.intel.com>
Download mbox | patch
Permalink /patch/3599/
State New, archived
Headers show

Comments

Saul Wold - May 10, 2011, 5:26 a.m.
From: Adrian Alonso <aalonso@secretlab.ca>

* Readline new recipe version 6.2

Signed-off-by: Adrian Alonso <aalonso@secretlab.ca>
---
 meta/recipes-core/readline/readline_6.2.bb |    6 ++++++
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/readline/readline_6.2.bb
Richard Purdie - May 10, 2011, 8:51 a.m.
On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 22:26 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> From: Adrian Alonso <aalonso@secretlab.ca>
> 
> * Readline new recipe version 6.2
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Alonso <aalonso@secretlab.ca>
> ---
>  meta/recipes-core/readline/readline_6.2.bb |    6 ++++++
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/readline/readline_6.2.bb

Why is readline 6.1 being kept?

Cheers,

Richard
Adrian Alonso - May 10, 2011, 2:53 p.m.
Unaware of delete recipe policy, there is also a recipe of readline version
5.2
should also be removed?

Send to list a patch that deletes recipe readline-6.1.bb

Regards

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Richard Purdie <
richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 22:26 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> > From: Adrian Alonso <aalonso@secretlab.ca>
> >
> > * Readline new recipe version 6.2
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Alonso <aalonso@secretlab.ca>
> > ---
> >  meta/recipes-core/readline/readline_6.2.bb |    6 ++++++
> >  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/readline/readline_6.2.bb
>
> Why is readline 6.1 being kept?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
Mark Hatle - May 10, 2011, 2:59 p.m.
On 5/10/11 9:53 AM, Adrian Alonso wrote:
> Unaware of delete recipe policy, there is also a recipe of readline version
> 5.2
> should also be removed?
> 
> Send to list a patch that deletes recipe readline-6.1.bb

There are two versions listed.  A GPLv2 and a GPLv3 version.  We're attempting
to preserve the last GPLv2 versions for a base set of recipes to enable people
who have specific license restrictions on their devices.

So updating 6.1 -> 6.2 (and removing 6.1) is definitely policy -- unless there
are components that have hard requirements on 6.1...

The GPLv2 version should remain for the time being.

--Mark

> Regards
> 
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Richard Purdie <
> richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 22:26 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
>>> From: Adrian Alonso <aalonso@secretlab.ca>
>>>
>>> * Readline new recipe version 6.2
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Adrian Alonso <aalonso@secretlab.ca>
>>> ---
>>>  meta/recipes-core/readline/readline_6.2.bb |    6 ++++++
>>>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>  create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/readline/readline_6.2.bb
>>
>> Why is readline 6.1 being kept?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
> 
>

Patch

diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/readline/readline_6.2.bb b/meta/recipes-core/readline/readline_6.2.bb
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5e32bb5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/readline/readline_6.2.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ 
+require readline.inc
+
+PR = "r0"
+
+SRC_URI[md5sum] = "67948acb2ca081f23359d0256e9a271c"
+SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "79a696070a058c233c72dd6ac697021cc64abd5ed51e59db867d66d196a89381"