| Submitter | ml@communistcode.co.uk |
|---|---|
| Date | Sept. 5, 2012, 2:02 p.m. |
| Message ID | <1346853750-503-3-git-send-email-ml@communistcode.co.uk> |
| Download | mbox | patch |
| Permalink | /patch/35939/ |
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
Comments
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 15:02:30 ml@communistcode.co.uk wrote: > From: Jack Mitchell <jack.mitchell@dbbroadcast.co.uk> > > - Now depends on liblockdev > - Slight licence change - new md5sum > > Signed-off-by: Jack Mitchell <jack.mitchell@dbbroadcast.co.uk> > --- > meta-oe/recipes-extended/libcec/libcec_git.bb | 10 +++++----- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-extended/libcec/libcec_git.bb > b/meta-oe/recipes-extended/libcec/libcec_git.bb index 142b2e2..f3cb39e > 100644 > --- a/meta-oe/recipes-extended/libcec/libcec_git.bb > +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-extended/libcec/libcec_git.bb > @@ -1,14 +1,14 @@ > DESCRIPTION = "USB CEC Adaptor communication Library" > HOMEPAGE = "http://libcec.pulse-eight.com/" > > -LICENSE = "GPLv2+" > -LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=185ead350fec5fc223da0f65f9a802af" > +LICENSE = "GPLv2" > +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=5e8e16396992369f73f3d28875f846da" > > -DEPENDS = "udev" > +DEPENDS = "udev liblockdev" > > PR = "r1" > -PV = "1.4.0" > -SRCREV = "2db8981f49fbd167ddbbf19c1fbadd064abc332a" > +PV = "1.8.2" > +SRCREV = "34a9cecdd92f6b2844f9c4054da202b152ab2217" > SRC_URI = "git://github.com/Pulse-Eight/libcec.git" > > S = "${WORKDIR}/git" It's not totally clear but it doesn't look like 1.8.2 has been released yet judging from their website; if that's the case then PV should be set to "1.8.1+git${SRCPV}". Cheers, Paul
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:16:10PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Wednesday 05 September 2012 15:02:30 ml@communistcode.co.uk wrote: > > From: Jack Mitchell <jack.mitchell@dbbroadcast.co.uk> > > > > - Now depends on liblockdev > > - Slight licence change - new md5sum > > > > Signed-off-by: Jack Mitchell <jack.mitchell@dbbroadcast.co.uk> > > --- > > meta-oe/recipes-extended/libcec/libcec_git.bb | 10 +++++----- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-extended/libcec/libcec_git.bb > > b/meta-oe/recipes-extended/libcec/libcec_git.bb index 142b2e2..f3cb39e > > 100644 > > --- a/meta-oe/recipes-extended/libcec/libcec_git.bb > > +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-extended/libcec/libcec_git.bb > > @@ -1,14 +1,14 @@ > > DESCRIPTION = "USB CEC Adaptor communication Library" > > HOMEPAGE = "http://libcec.pulse-eight.com/" > > > > -LICENSE = "GPLv2+" > > -LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=185ead350fec5fc223da0f65f9a802af" > > +LICENSE = "GPLv2" > > +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=5e8e16396992369f73f3d28875f846da" > > > > -DEPENDS = "udev" > > +DEPENDS = "udev liblockdev" > > > > PR = "r1" > > -PV = "1.4.0" > > -SRCREV = "2db8981f49fbd167ddbbf19c1fbadd064abc332a" > > +PV = "1.8.2" > > +SRCREV = "34a9cecdd92f6b2844f9c4054da202b152ab2217" > > SRC_URI = "git://github.com/Pulse-Eight/libcec.git" > > > > S = "${WORKDIR}/git" > > It's not totally clear but it doesn't look like 1.8.2 has been released yet > judging from their website; if that's the case then PV should be set to > "1.8.1+git${SRCPV}". Or rather "1.8.1+gitr${SRCPV}" like most meta-* recipes Cheers,
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 21:28:18 Martin Jansa wrote: > On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:16:10PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > It's not totally clear but it doesn't look like 1.8.2 has been released > > yet judging from their website; if that's the case then PV should be set > > to "1.8.1+git${SRCPV}". > > Or rather > "1.8.1+gitr${SRCPV}" > like most meta-* recipes This was discussed not that long ago IIRC - the r is superfluous for git. In fact if you look at most OE-Core recipes that use SRCPV they do not precede it with r. Cheers, Paul
On 05/09/12 22:32, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Wednesday 05 September 2012 21:28:18 Martin Jansa wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:16:10PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: >>> It's not totally clear but it doesn't look like 1.8.2 has been released >>> yet judging from their website; if that's the case then PV should be set >>> to "1.8.1+git${SRCPV}". >> Or rather >> "1.8.1+gitr${SRCPV}" >> like most meta-* recipes > This was discussed not that long ago IIRC - the r is superfluous for git. In > fact if you look at most OE-Core recipes that use SRCPV they do not precede it > with r. > > Cheers, > Paul > So even though it is the 1.8.1 release commit it should still be tagged with the git SRCPV?
On Thursday 06 September 2012 09:12:52 Jack Mitchell wrote: > On 05/09/12 22:32, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > On Wednesday 05 September 2012 21:28:18 Martin Jansa wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:16:10PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > >>> It's not totally clear but it doesn't look like 1.8.2 has been released > >>> yet judging from their website; if that's the case then PV should be set > >>> to "1.8.1+git${SRCPV}". > >> > >> Or rather > >> "1.8.1+gitr${SRCPV}" > >> like most meta-* recipes > > > > This was discussed not that long ago IIRC - the r is superfluous for git. > > In fact if you look at most OE-Core recipes that use SRCPV they do not > > precede it with r. > > > > Cheers, > > Paul > > So even though it is the 1.8.1 release commit it should still be tagged > with the git SRCPV? Well, I don't personally think so - if it really is 1.8.1 (and it's pointing at the same revision as the "1.8.1" tag, so it ought to be) then I don't think it should be needed. Cheers, Paul
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Jack Mitchell <ml@communistcode.co.uk>wrote: > On 05/09/12 22:32, Paul Eggleton wrote: > >> On Wednesday 05 September 2012 21:28:18 Martin Jansa wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:16:10PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: >>> >>>> It's not totally clear but it doesn't look like 1.8.2 has been released >>>> yet judging from their website; if that's the case then PV should be set >>>> to "1.8.1+git${SRCPV}". >>>> >>> Or rather >>> "1.8.1+gitr${SRCPV}" >>> like most meta-* recipes >>> >> This was discussed not that long ago IIRC - the r is superfluous for git. >> In >> fact if you look at most OE-Core recipes that use SRCPV they do not >> precede it >> with r. >> >> Cheers, >> Paul >> >> > So even though it is the 1.8.1 release commit it should still be tagged > with the git SRCPV? > > No. The SRCPV should be there to indicate that your version is something in between 2 official versions. In your case as there is not 1.8.2 officially you state that this package is 1.8.1 but at a later SRCPV commit. You need v1.8.2? There is no rpi support in 1.8.1? Why don't you update to that version? Andrei
On 06/09/12 09:37, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Jack Mitchell <ml@communistcode.co.uk>wrote: > >> On 05/09/12 22:32, Paul Eggleton wrote: >> >>> On Wednesday 05 September 2012 21:28:18 Martin Jansa wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:16:10PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: >>>> >>>>> It's not totally clear but it doesn't look like 1.8.2 has been released >>>>> yet judging from their website; if that's the case then PV should be set >>>>> to "1.8.1+git${SRCPV}". >>>>> >>>> Or rather >>>> "1.8.1+gitr${SRCPV}" >>>> like most meta-* recipes >>>> >>> This was discussed not that long ago IIRC - the r is superfluous for git. >>> In >>> fact if you look at most OE-Core recipes that use SRCPV they do not >>> precede it >>> with r. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Paul >>> >>> >> So even though it is the 1.8.1 release commit it should still be tagged >> with the git SRCPV? >> >> > No. The SRCPV should be there to indicate that your version is something in > between 2 official versions. In your case as there is not > 1.8.2 officially you state that this package is 1.8.1 but at a > later SRCPV commit. > > You need v1.8.2? There is no rpi support in 1.8.1? Why don't you update to > that version? > > Andrei There is RPi support merged in 1.8.1 - I had read the changelog to get the version number and they had listed 1.8.2 in it which lead me to believe it was already at 1.8.2 but it was just a 'work in progress' 1.8.2. The current commit is the 1.8.1 tag and has the features I need so I don't need to put in a 1.8.1+wip. Regards,
On 06/09/12 09:30, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Thursday 06 September 2012 09:12:52 Jack Mitchell wrote: >> On 05/09/12 22:32, Paul Eggleton wrote: >>> On Wednesday 05 September 2012 21:28:18 Martin Jansa wrote: >>>> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:16:10PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: >>>>> It's not totally clear but it doesn't look like 1.8.2 has been released >>>>> yet judging from their website; if that's the case then PV should be set >>>>> to "1.8.1+git${SRCPV}". >>>> Or rather >>>> "1.8.1+gitr${SRCPV}" >>>> like most meta-* recipes >>> This was discussed not that long ago IIRC - the r is superfluous for git. >>> In fact if you look at most OE-Core recipes that use SRCPV they do not >>> precede it with r. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Paul >> So even though it is the 1.8.1 release commit it should still be tagged >> with the git SRCPV? > Well, I don't personally think so - if it really is 1.8.1 (and it's pointing > at the same revision as the "1.8.1" tag, so it ought to be) then I don't think > it should be needed. > > Cheers, > Paul > Ok, that is how I envisioned it - thanks for clearing it up.
Patch
diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-extended/libcec/libcec_git.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-extended/libcec/libcec_git.bb index 142b2e2..f3cb39e 100644 --- a/meta-oe/recipes-extended/libcec/libcec_git.bb +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-extended/libcec/libcec_git.bb @@ -1,14 +1,14 @@ DESCRIPTION = "USB CEC Adaptor communication Library" HOMEPAGE = "http://libcec.pulse-eight.com/" -LICENSE = "GPLv2+" -LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=185ead350fec5fc223da0f65f9a802af" +LICENSE = "GPLv2" +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=5e8e16396992369f73f3d28875f846da" -DEPENDS = "udev" +DEPENDS = "udev liblockdev" PR = "r1" -PV = "1.4.0" -SRCREV = "2db8981f49fbd167ddbbf19c1fbadd064abc332a" +PV = "1.8.2" +SRCREV = "34a9cecdd92f6b2844f9c4054da202b152ab2217" SRC_URI = "git://github.com/Pulse-Eight/libcec.git" S = "${WORKDIR}/git"