Comments
Patch
@@ -161,6 +161,10 @@ def package_qa_check_rpath(file,name, d, elf, messages):
if dir in line:
messages.append("package %s contains bad RPATH %s in file %s" % (name, line, file))
+def rpath_eq(a, b):
+ import os.path
+ return os.path.normpath(a) == os.path.normpath(b)
+
QAPATHTEST[useless-rpaths] = "package_qa_check_useless_rpaths"
def package_qa_check_useless_rpaths(file, name, d, elf, messages):
"""
@@ -181,10 +185,13 @@ def package_qa_check_useless_rpaths(file, name, d, elf, messages):
m = rpath_re.match(line)
if m:
rpath = m.group(1)
- if rpath == libdir or rpath == base_libdir:
- # The dynamic linker searches both these places anyway. There is no point in
- # looking there again.
- messages.append("%s: %s contains probably-redundant RPATH %s" % (name, package_qa_clean_path(file, d), rpath))
+ if rpath_eq(rpath, libdir) or rpath_eq(rpath, base_libdir):
+ # The dynamic linker searches both these places anyway.
+ # There is no point in looking there again. And it may
+ # be harmful: the RPATH may point to host directories
+ # (e.g. /usr/lib) which will be searched at link time,
+ # creating build issues.
+ messages.append("%s: %s contains probably-redundant, possibly host-polluted RPATH %s" % (name, package_qa_clean_path(file, d), rpath))
QAPATHTEST[dev-so] = "package_qa_check_dev"
def package_qa_check_dev(path, name, d, elf, messages):
In toolchain edge cases it's possible for the RPATH of a library to be set to something like "/usr/lib/../lib". This should be detected as "/usr/lib" and generate a warning. Also clarify the warning text to indicate potential link-time pollution from the host libraries. Signed-off-by: Andy Ross <andy.ross@windriver.com> --- meta/classes/insane.bbclass | 15 +++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)