| Submitter | Paul Gortmaker |
|---|---|
| Date | Aug. 13, 2012, 10:43 p.m. |
| Message ID | <1344897787-27726-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> |
| Download | mbox | patch |
| Permalink | /patch/34451/ |
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
Comments
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 18:43 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > Without this, you will get occasional build failures if libproxy > tries to build before the glib headers are placed in the sysroot. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb b/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb > index 7e3cf27..a39e3a8 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb > +++ b/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb > @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1+" > LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=7d7044444a7b1b116e8783edcdb44ff4 \ > file://utils/proxy.c;beginline=1;endline=18;md5=55152a1006d7dafbef32baf9c30a99c0" > > -DEPENDS = "gconf" > +DEPENDS = "gconf glib-2.0" > We've gone around in circles on this and had issues over circular dependencies. The bottom line is that we don't need glib-2.0 here, we want to disable the glib-2.0 using components of libproxy. I don't know cmake well enough to know how to configure it to do this though (instead of autodetecting) Cheers, Richard
On 12-08-17 12:57 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 18:43 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: >> Without this, you will get occasional build failures if libproxy >> tries to build before the glib headers are placed in the sysroot. >> >> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> >> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb b/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb >> index 7e3cf27..a39e3a8 100644 >> --- a/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb >> +++ b/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb >> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1+" >> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=7d7044444a7b1b116e8783edcdb44ff4 \ >> file://utils/proxy.c;beginline=1;endline=18;md5=55152a1006d7dafbef32baf9c30a99c0" >> >> -DEPENDS = "gconf" >> +DEPENDS = "gconf glib-2.0" >> > > We've gone around in circles on this and had issues over circular > dependencies. The bottom line is that we don't need glib-2.0 here, we > want to disable the glib-2.0 using components of libproxy. I don't know Fair enough. Can we _finally_ fix the mailing lists to not override the To/Cc lines with crap Reply-To: lines? Once again I almost missed seeing this reply, since I was no longer on the To/Cc. AFAICT, all were in agreement that it was broken, but it never got fixed. Thanks, Paul. -- > cmake well enough to know how to configure it to do this though (instead > of autodetecting) > > Cheers, > > Richard > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > >
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> wrote: > On 12-08-17 12:57 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: >> On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 18:43 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: >>> Without this, you will get occasional build failures if libproxy >>> tries to build before the glib headers are placed in the sysroot. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> >>> >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb b/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb >>> index 7e3cf27..a39e3a8 100644 >>> --- a/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb >>> +++ b/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb >>> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1+" >>> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=7d7044444a7b1b116e8783edcdb44ff4 \ >>> file://utils/proxy.c;beginline=1;endline=18;md5=55152a1006d7dafbef32baf9c30a99c0" >>> >>> -DEPENDS = "gconf" >>> +DEPENDS = "gconf glib-2.0" >>> >> >> We've gone around in circles on this and had issues over circular >> dependencies. The bottom line is that we don't need glib-2.0 here, we >> want to disable the glib-2.0 using components of libproxy. I don't know > > Fair enough. > > Can we _finally_ fix the mailing lists to not override the To/Cc lines > with crap Reply-To: lines? Once again I almost missed seeing this reply, > since I was no longer on the To/Cc. PLEASE ;) -M > > AFAICT, all were in agreement that it was broken, but it never got fixed. > > Thanks, > Paul. > -- > >> cmake well enough to know how to configure it to do this though (instead >> of autodetecting) >> >> Cheers, >> >> Richard >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 14:07 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > On 12-08-17 12:57 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 18:43 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > >> Without this, you will get occasional build failures if libproxy > >> tries to build before the glib headers are placed in the sysroot. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> > >> > >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb b/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb > >> index 7e3cf27..a39e3a8 100644 > >> --- a/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb > >> +++ b/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb > >> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1+" > >> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=7d7044444a7b1b116e8783edcdb44ff4 \ > >> file://utils/proxy.c;beginline=1;endline=18;md5=55152a1006d7dafbef32baf9c30a99c0" > >> > >> -DEPENDS = "gconf" > >> +DEPENDS = "gconf glib-2.0" > >> > > > > We've gone around in circles on this and had issues over circular > > dependencies. The bottom line is that we don't need glib-2.0 here, we > > want to disable the glib-2.0 using components of libproxy. I don't know > > Fair enough. > > Can we _finally_ fix the mailing lists to not override the To/Cc lines > with crap Reply-To: lines? Once again I almost missed seeing this reply, > since I was no longer on the To/Cc. > > AFAICT, all were in agreement that it was broken, but it never got fixed. There were a few things causing problems here such as lost admin access. Those have been resolved and I just changed the setting that I think was causing the problems. Let me know if there are still issues... Cheers, Richard
On 12-08-17 05:41 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 14:07 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: >> On 12-08-17 12:57 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: >>> On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 18:43 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: >>>> Without this, you will get occasional build failures if libproxy >>>> tries to build before the glib headers are placed in the sysroot. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> >>>> >>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb b/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb >>>> index 7e3cf27..a39e3a8 100644 >>>> --- a/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb >>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb >>>> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1+" >>>> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=7d7044444a7b1b116e8783edcdb44ff4 \ >>>> file://utils/proxy.c;beginline=1;endline=18;md5=55152a1006d7dafbef32baf9c30a99c0" >>>> >>>> -DEPENDS = "gconf" >>>> +DEPENDS = "gconf glib-2.0" >>>> >>> >>> We've gone around in circles on this and had issues over circular >>> dependencies. The bottom line is that we don't need glib-2.0 here, we >>> want to disable the glib-2.0 using components of libproxy. I don't know >> >> Fair enough. >> >> Can we _finally_ fix the mailing lists to not override the To/Cc lines >> with crap Reply-To: lines? Once again I almost missed seeing this reply, >> since I was no longer on the To/Cc. >> >> AFAICT, all were in agreement that it was broken, but it never got fixed. > > There were a few things causing problems here such as lost admin access. > Those have been resolved and I just changed the setting that I think was > causing the problems. Let me know if there are still issues... Looks good now, thanks a lot. Much appreciated by many, I'm sure. Paul. -- > > Cheers, > > Richard >
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> wrote: > On 12-08-17 05:41 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: >> On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 14:07 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: >>> On 12-08-17 12:57 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: >>>> On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 18:43 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: >>>>> Without this, you will get occasional build failures if libproxy >>>>> tries to build before the glib headers are placed in the sysroot. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb b/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb >>>>> index 7e3cf27..a39e3a8 100644 >>>>> --- a/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb >>>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb >>>>> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1+" >>>>> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=7d7044444a7b1b116e8783edcdb44ff4 \ >>>>> file://utils/proxy.c;beginline=1;endline=18;md5=55152a1006d7dafbef32baf9c30a99c0" >>>>> >>>>> -DEPENDS = "gconf" >>>>> +DEPENDS = "gconf glib-2.0" >>>>> >>>> >>>> We've gone around in circles on this and had issues over circular >>>> dependencies. The bottom line is that we don't need glib-2.0 here, we >>>> want to disable the glib-2.0 using components of libproxy. I don't know >>> >>> Fair enough. >>> >>> Can we _finally_ fix the mailing lists to not override the To/Cc lines >>> with crap Reply-To: lines? Once again I almost missed seeing this reply, >>> since I was no longer on the To/Cc. >>> >>> AFAICT, all were in agreement that it was broken, but it never got fixed. >> >> There were a few things causing problems here such as lost admin access. >> Those have been resolved and I just changed the setting that I think was >> causing the problems. Let me know if there are still issues... > > Looks good now, thanks a lot. Much appreciated by many, I'm sure. Awesome, looks to be working for me too. Did you do oe-devel as well? -M
Patch
diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb b/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb index 7e3cf27..a39e3a8 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb +++ b/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1+" LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=7d7044444a7b1b116e8783edcdb44ff4 \ file://utils/proxy.c;beginline=1;endline=18;md5=55152a1006d7dafbef32baf9c30a99c0" -DEPENDS = "gconf" +DEPENDS = "gconf glib-2.0" PR = "r4"
Without this, you will get occasional build failures if libproxy tries to build before the glib headers are placed in the sysroot. Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>