| Submitter | Khem Raj |
|---|---|
| Date | Jan. 24, 2011, 2:03 a.m. |
| Message ID | <1295834629-3974-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> |
| Download | mbox | patch |
| Permalink | /patch/344/ |
| State | Rejected |
| Headers | show |
Comments
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 24-01-11 03:03, Khem Raj wrote: > * no need to pin older udev with uclibc/git either > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> NAK! binutils 2.21 introduces way too many problem at this moment, those need to get solved before switching to it. > --- > conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf | 6 +++--- > .../include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc | 1 - > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf b/conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf > index c6fb07d..3ac3847 100644 > --- a/conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf > +++ b/conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf > @@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-libc-headers-native = "${LINUX_LIBC_HEADERS_VERSION}" > #Prefer glibc 2.6 and uclibc 0.9.30, these have had the most testing. > PREFERRED_VERSION_glibc ?= "2.10.1" > PREFERRED_VERSION_glibc-initial ?= "2.10.1" > -PREFERRED_VERSION_uclibc ?= "0.9.30.2" > -PREFERRED_VERSION_uclibc-initial ?= "0.9.30.2" > +PREFERRED_VERSION_uclibc ?= "git" > +PREFERRED_VERSION_uclibc-initial ?= "git" > PREFERRED_VERSION_eglibc ?= "2.12" > PREFERRED_VERSION_eglibc-initial ?= "2.12" > > @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION_avr32 ?= "4.2.2" > #Everybody else can just use this: > ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION ?= "4.5" > > -ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION ?= "2.20.1" > +ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION ?= "2.21" > > PREFERRED_VERSION_binutils ?= "${ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION}" > PREFERRED_VERSION_binutils-cross ?= "${ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION}" > diff --git a/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc b/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc > index 5532f29..66ee5ab 100644 > --- a/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc > +++ b/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc > @@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ PREFERRED_VERSION_samba = "3.3.9" > PREFERRED_VERSION_tiff = "3.9.4+4.0.0beta6" > > PREFERRED_VERSION_udev = "165" > -PREFERRED_VERSION_udev_libc-uclibc = "141" > UDEV_GE_141 = "1" > > PREFERRED_VERSION_usbutils = "0.86" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFNPUAeMkyGM64RGpERAm6CAJsHFPAQdphhKT4liYnMNE57ubU32wCfeJim 6pPp+1le2CwVszFtrNlJ+Qk= =ihdt -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 24-01-11 03:03, Khem Raj wrote: >> * no need to pin older udev with uclibc/git either >> >> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> > > NAK! binutils 2.21 introduces way too many problem at this moment, those > need to get solved before switching to it. hmmm. Too vague a statement. Do you have list of issues somewhere I can look at it built the console-image x11-image images I tried and booted console-image too. > >> --- >> conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf | 6 +++--- >> .../include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc | 1 - >> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf b/conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf >> index c6fb07d..3ac3847 100644 >> --- a/conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf >> +++ b/conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf >> @@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-libc-headers-native = "${LINUX_LIBC_HEADERS_VERSION}" >> #Prefer glibc 2.6 and uclibc 0.9.30, these have had the most testing. >> PREFERRED_VERSION_glibc ?= "2.10.1" >> PREFERRED_VERSION_glibc-initial ?= "2.10.1" >> -PREFERRED_VERSION_uclibc ?= "0.9.30.2" >> -PREFERRED_VERSION_uclibc-initial ?= "0.9.30.2" >> +PREFERRED_VERSION_uclibc ?= "git" >> +PREFERRED_VERSION_uclibc-initial ?= "git" >> PREFERRED_VERSION_eglibc ?= "2.12" >> PREFERRED_VERSION_eglibc-initial ?= "2.12" >> >> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION_avr32 ?= "4.2.2" >> #Everybody else can just use this: >> ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION ?= "4.5" >> >> -ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION ?= "2.20.1" >> +ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION ?= "2.21" >> >> PREFERRED_VERSION_binutils ?= "${ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION}" >> PREFERRED_VERSION_binutils-cross ?= "${ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION}" >> diff --git a/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc b/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc >> index 5532f29..66ee5ab 100644 >> --- a/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc >> +++ b/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc >> @@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ PREFERRED_VERSION_samba = "3.3.9" >> PREFERRED_VERSION_tiff = "3.9.4+4.0.0beta6" >> >> PREFERRED_VERSION_udev = "165" >> -PREFERRED_VERSION_udev_libc-uclibc = "141" >> UDEV_GE_141 = "1" >> >> PREFERRED_VERSION_usbutils = "0.86" > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) > > iD8DBQFNPUAeMkyGM64RGpERAm6CAJsHFPAQdphhKT4liYnMNE57ubU32wCfeJim > 6pPp+1le2CwVszFtrNlJ+Qk= > =ihdt > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel >
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 24-01-11 10:15, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl> wrote: > On 24-01-11 03:03, Khem Raj wrote: >>>> * no need to pin older udev with uclibc/git either >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> > > NAK! binutils 2.21 introduces way too many problem at this moment, those > need to get solved before switching to it. > >> hmmm. Too vague a statement. Do you have list of issues somewhere I can look at >> it built the console-image x11-image images I tried and booted >> console-image too. Try building anything that uses linux-omap-psp 2.6.32. You will run into the secure mode problem. That one is relatively easy to solve, but it needs to get solved *before* the switch, not after. But besided that, so a change needs to get RFC'd, tested and signed off by the angstrom maintainers before it gets pushed. It's a toolchain change and we take toolchains seriously. Waking up and seeing it applied without all that is *extremely* insulting. So I reverted it. > > >>>> --- >>>> conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf | 6 +++--- >>>> .../include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc | 1 - >>>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf b/conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf >>>> index c6fb07d..3ac3847 100644 >>>> --- a/conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf >>>> +++ b/conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf >>>> @@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-libc-headers-native = "${LINUX_LIBC_HEADERS_VERSION}" >>>> #Prefer glibc 2.6 and uclibc 0.9.30, these have had the most testing. >>>> PREFERRED_VERSION_glibc ?= "2.10.1" >>>> PREFERRED_VERSION_glibc-initial ?= "2.10.1" >>>> -PREFERRED_VERSION_uclibc ?= "0.9.30.2" >>>> -PREFERRED_VERSION_uclibc-initial ?= "0.9.30.2" >>>> +PREFERRED_VERSION_uclibc ?= "git" >>>> +PREFERRED_VERSION_uclibc-initial ?= "git" >>>> PREFERRED_VERSION_eglibc ?= "2.12" >>>> PREFERRED_VERSION_eglibc-initial ?= "2.12" >>>> >>>> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION_avr32 ?= "4.2.2" >>>> #Everybody else can just use this: >>>> ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION ?= "4.5" >>>> >>>> -ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION ?= "2.20.1" >>>> +ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION ?= "2.21" >>>> >>>> PREFERRED_VERSION_binutils ?= "${ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION}" >>>> PREFERRED_VERSION_binutils-cross ?= "${ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION}" >>>> diff --git a/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc b/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc >>>> index 5532f29..66ee5ab 100644 >>>> --- a/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc >>>> +++ b/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc >>>> @@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ PREFERRED_VERSION_samba = "3.3.9" >>>> PREFERRED_VERSION_tiff = "3.9.4+4.0.0beta6" >>>> >>>> PREFERRED_VERSION_udev = "165" >>>> -PREFERRED_VERSION_udev_libc-uclibc = "141" >>>> UDEV_GE_141 = "1" >>>> >>>> PREFERRED_VERSION_usbutils = "0.86" > >> >>
2011/1/24 Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 24-01-11 10:15, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl> wrote: >> On 24-01-11 03:03, Khem Raj wrote: >>>>> * no need to pin older udev with uclibc/git either >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> >> >> NAK! binutils 2.21 introduces way too many problem at this moment, those >> need to get solved before switching to it. >> >>> hmmm. Too vague a statement. Do you have list of issues somewhere I can look at >>> it built the console-image x11-image images I tried and booted >>> console-image too. > > Try building anything that uses linux-omap-psp 2.6.32. You will run into > the secure mode problem. That one is relatively easy to solve, but it > needs to get solved *before* the switch, not after. > > But besided that, so a change needs to get RFC'd, tested and signed off > by the angstrom maintainers before it gets pushed. It's a toolchain > change and we take toolchains seriously. > > Waking up and seeing it applied without all that is *extremely* > insulting. So I reverted it. > Pushing distro changes without review is against the policy: From http://www.openembedded.org/index.php/Commit_Policy: * Distro config changes should be reviewed by the distro maintainers where known Reveting changes from others is also against the policy: http://www.openembedded.org/index.php/Revert_Policy (and imho equally bad (or insulting if you prefer)) Do unto others as you would have them do unto you My two eurocents. Frans.
On 01/24/2011 02:59 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2011/1/24 Koen Kooi<k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 24-01-11 10:15, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Koen Kooi<k.kooi@student.utwente.nl> wrote: >>> On 24-01-11 03:03, Khem Raj wrote: >>>>>> * no need to pin older udev with uclibc/git either >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj<raj.khem@gmail.com> >>> >>> NAK! binutils 2.21 introduces way too many problem at this moment, those >>> need to get solved before switching to it. >>> >>>> hmmm. Too vague a statement. Do you have list of issues somewhere I can look at >>>> it built the console-image x11-image images I tried and booted >>>> console-image too. >> >> Try building anything that uses linux-omap-psp 2.6.32. You will run into >> the secure mode problem. That one is relatively easy to solve, but it >> needs to get solved *before* the switch, not after. >> >> But besided that, so a change needs to get RFC'd, tested and signed off >> by the angstrom maintainers before it gets pushed. It's a toolchain >> change and we take toolchains seriously. >> >> Waking up and seeing it applied without all that is *extremely* >> insulting. So I reverted it. >> > > Pushing distro changes without review is against the policy: > >> From http://www.openembedded.org/index.php/Commit_Policy: > > * Distro config changes should be reviewed by the distro maintainers > where known > > Reveting changes from others is also against the policy: > > http://www.openembedded.org/index.php/Revert_Policy > > (and imho equally bad (or insulting if you prefer)) > > > Do unto others as you would have them do unto you Well, no. I'm pretty sure the "you just broke my distribution" falls into the yes, it's OK to push the revert before the other party wakes up and says "Oops, sorry!".
On 01/24/2011 01:59 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2011/1/24 Koen Kooi<k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> > Pushing distro changes without review is against the policy: > >> From http://www.openembedded.org/index.php/Commit_Policy: > > * Distro config changes should be reviewed by the distro maintainers > where known > > Reveting changes from others is also against the policy: > > http://www.openembedded.org/index.php/Revert_Policy > > (and imho equally bad (or insulting if you prefer)) > > > Do unto others as you would have them do unto you > > My two eurocents. Frans. Frans, as noted this change intoduces serious issues with some Angstrom targets. The Angstrom devs know what is best for Angstrom. I'm not sure what Khem was thinking by pushing this change without consulting with Angstrom devs. Philip
On 01/24/2011 08:15 AM, Philip Balister wrote: > On 01/24/2011 01:59 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> 2011/1/24 Koen Kooi<k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>: >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >> Pushing distro changes without review is against the policy: >> >>> From http://www.openembedded.org/index.php/Commit_Policy: >> >> * Distro config changes should be reviewed by the distro maintainers >> where known >> >> Reveting changes from others is also against the policy: >> >> http://www.openembedded.org/index.php/Revert_Policy >> >> (and imho equally bad (or insulting if you prefer)) >> >> >> Do unto others as you would have them do unto you >> >> My two eurocents. Frans. > > Frans, as noted this change intoduces serious issues with some Angstrom > targets. The Angstrom devs know what is best for Angstrom. I'm not sure > what Khem was thinking by pushing this change without consulting with > Angstrom devs. Not to put too many words into Khem's mouth, but I imagine it was that he checked this in on the same branch as the other changes he pushed last night and forgot (time for some 'git stash'ing Khem :))
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 1:39 AM, Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 24-01-11 10:15, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl> wrote: >> On 24-01-11 03:03, Khem Raj wrote: >>>>> * no need to pin older udev with uclibc/git either >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> >> >> NAK! binutils 2.21 introduces way too many problem at this moment, those >> need to get solved before switching to it. >> >>> hmmm. Too vague a statement. Do you have list of issues somewhere I can look at >>> it built the console-image x11-image images I tried and booted >>> console-image too. > > Try building anything that uses linux-omap-psp 2.6.32. You will run into > the secure mode problem. That one is relatively easy to solve, but it > needs to get solved *before* the switch, not after. > > But besided that, so a change needs to get RFC'd, tested and signed off > by the angstrom maintainers before it gets pushed. It's a toolchain > change and we take toolchains seriously. > > Waking up and seeing it applied without all that is *extremely* > insulting. So I reverted it. Koen bah it was not intentionally pushed. I wanted to push the other gcc change and git push pushed all branches. I should probably not track remote branches that way git push wont do this kind of mess. Sorry for the hassle. Thank you for reverting it > >> >> >>>>> --- >>>>> conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf | 6 +++--- >>>>> .../include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc | 1 - >>>>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf b/conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf >>>>> index c6fb07d..3ac3847 100644 >>>>> --- a/conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf >>>>> +++ b/conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf >>>>> @@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-libc-headers-native = "${LINUX_LIBC_HEADERS_VERSION}" >>>>> #Prefer glibc 2.6 and uclibc 0.9.30, these have had the most testing. >>>>> PREFERRED_VERSION_glibc ?= "2.10.1" >>>>> PREFERRED_VERSION_glibc-initial ?= "2.10.1" >>>>> -PREFERRED_VERSION_uclibc ?= "0.9.30.2" >>>>> -PREFERRED_VERSION_uclibc-initial ?= "0.9.30.2" >>>>> +PREFERRED_VERSION_uclibc ?= "git" >>>>> +PREFERRED_VERSION_uclibc-initial ?= "git" >>>>> PREFERRED_VERSION_eglibc ?= "2.12" >>>>> PREFERRED_VERSION_eglibc-initial ?= "2.12" >>>>> >>>>> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION_avr32 ?= "4.2.2" >>>>> #Everybody else can just use this: >>>>> ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION ?= "4.5" >>>>> >>>>> -ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION ?= "2.20.1" >>>>> +ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION ?= "2.21" >>>>> >>>>> PREFERRED_VERSION_binutils ?= "${ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION}" >>>>> PREFERRED_VERSION_binutils-cross ?= "${ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION}" >>>>> diff --git a/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc b/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc >>>>> index 5532f29..66ee5ab 100644 >>>>> --- a/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc >>>>> +++ b/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc >>>>> @@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ PREFERRED_VERSION_samba = "3.3.9" >>>>> PREFERRED_VERSION_tiff = "3.9.4+4.0.0beta6" >>>>> >>>>> PREFERRED_VERSION_udev = "165" >>>>> -PREFERRED_VERSION_udev_libc-uclibc = "141" >>>>> UDEV_GE_141 = "1" >>>>> >>>>> PREFERRED_VERSION_usbutils = "0.86" >> >>> >>> > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel >>> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-devel mailing list >> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) > > iD8DBQFNPUjjMkyGM64RGpERAhlFAJ0WQYEHLjLVp4uJAQ6N75/EYnCYegCfZdMK > WxfAO9VF9GtRwgDa5cvFipA= > =hJkJ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel >
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Tom Rini <tom_rini@mentor.com> wrote: > > Not to put too many words into Khem's mouth, but I imagine it was that he > checked this in on the same branch as the other changes he pushed last night > and forgot (time for some 'git stash'ing Khem :)) > > yeah in order to send the review thru git format-patch/git send-email you need to commit it somewhere and this has bitten me more than once plus it was too late in the night so I will forgive myself but look for some pre-push hooks to show me what its pushing before it finally does so. If anyone knows of such a hook please lemme know
Hello Khem, On 01/24/2011 04:38 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >> bah it was not intentionally pushed. I wanted to push the other gcc >> change and git push >> pushed all branches. I should probably not track remote branches that >> way git push wont >> do this kind of mess. Sorry for the hassle. Thank you for reverting it you can set "git config push.default current" to push only the current branch. Regards, Andreas
Patch
diff --git a/conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf b/conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf index c6fb07d..3ac3847 100644 --- a/conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf +++ b/conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf @@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-libc-headers-native = "${LINUX_LIBC_HEADERS_VERSION}" #Prefer glibc 2.6 and uclibc 0.9.30, these have had the most testing. PREFERRED_VERSION_glibc ?= "2.10.1" PREFERRED_VERSION_glibc-initial ?= "2.10.1" -PREFERRED_VERSION_uclibc ?= "0.9.30.2" -PREFERRED_VERSION_uclibc-initial ?= "0.9.30.2" +PREFERRED_VERSION_uclibc ?= "git" +PREFERRED_VERSION_uclibc-initial ?= "git" PREFERRED_VERSION_eglibc ?= "2.12" PREFERRED_VERSION_eglibc-initial ?= "2.12" @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION_avr32 ?= "4.2.2" #Everybody else can just use this: ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION ?= "4.5" -ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION ?= "2.20.1" +ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION ?= "2.21" PREFERRED_VERSION_binutils ?= "${ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION}" PREFERRED_VERSION_binutils-cross ?= "${ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION}" diff --git a/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc b/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc index 5532f29..66ee5ab 100644 --- a/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc +++ b/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc @@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ PREFERRED_VERSION_samba = "3.3.9" PREFERRED_VERSION_tiff = "3.9.4+4.0.0beta6" PREFERRED_VERSION_udev = "165" -PREFERRED_VERSION_udev_libc-uclibc = "141" UDEV_GE_141 = "1" PREFERRED_VERSION_usbutils = "0.86"
* no need to pin older udev with uclibc/git either Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> --- conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf | 6 +++--- .../include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc | 1 - 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)