| Submitter | Paul Gortmaker |
|---|---|
| Date | July 2, 2012, 5:44 a.m. |
| Message ID | <1341207885-9463-4-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> |
| Download | mbox | patch |
| Permalink | /patch/30975/ |
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | 7fdd1f82803df9752e908f01f7643d66b82a690e |
| Headers | show |
Comments
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> wrote: > The u-boot tree is fully capable of parallel builds, so this > setting should not exist as a blanket setting for all of the > recipes. Going forward, if there is a parallelism issue > in u-boot, it needs to be reported and fixed there, and not > with the "make -j1" band-aid approach. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Acked-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> I've been building it with -j12 for long time, it does work :-)
Patch
diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc index 3226bd4..3df7418 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc +++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc @@ -5,8 +5,6 @@ PROVIDES = "virtual/bootloader" inherit deploy -PARALLEL_MAKE="" - EXTRA_OEMAKE = "CROSS_COMPILE=${TARGET_PREFIX}" python () {
The u-boot tree is fully capable of parallel builds, so this setting should not exist as a blanket setting for all of the recipes. Going forward, if there is a parallelism issue in u-boot, it needs to be reported and fixed there, and not with the "make -j1" band-aid approach. Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> --- meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)