diff mbox series

layer.conf: update LAYERSERIES_COMPAT for nanbield

Message ID 20230910163550.3900070-1-martin.jansa@gmail.com
State New
Headers show
Series layer.conf: update LAYERSERIES_COMPAT for nanbield | expand

Commit Message

Martin Jansa Sept. 10, 2023, 4:35 p.m. UTC
* oe-core switched to nanbield in:
  https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=f212cb12a0db9c9de5afd3cc89b1331d386e55f6

Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
---
 meta-arm-bsp/conf/layer.conf       | 2 +-
 meta-arm-toolchain/conf/layer.conf | 2 +-
 meta-arm/conf/layer.conf           | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Jon Mason Sept. 12, 2023, 3:56 a.m. UTC | #1
On Sun, 10 Sep 2023 18:35:50 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> * oe-core switched to nanbield in:
>   https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=f212cb12a0db9c9de5afd3cc89b1331d386e55f6
> 
> 

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] layer.conf: update LAYERSERIES_COMPAT for nanbield
      commit: 2d809a7c3511b9fcb71f1b264184e7840a378adc

Best regards,
Jon Mason Sept. 12, 2023, 4:01 a.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 11:57 PM Jon Mason via lists.yoctoproject.org
<jdmason=kudzu.us@lists.yoctoproject.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 10 Sep 2023 18:35:50 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > * oe-core switched to nanbield in:
> >   https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=f212cb12a0db9c9de5afd3cc89b1331d386e55f6
> >
> >
>
> Applied, thanks!
>
> [1/1] layer.conf: update LAYERSERIES_COMPAT for nanbield
>       commit: 2d809a7c3511b9fcb71f1b264184e7840a378adc

Actually, what was included in meta-arm was Khem's patch, not yours
(though identical patches, his was the one that made it in).  Weird
that the b4 tooling got confused.  Sorry for the noise.

Thanks,
Jon


> Best regards,
> --
> Jon Mason <jon.mason@arm.com>
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> View/Reply Online (#5035): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-arm/message/5035
> Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/101275923/3616920
> Group Owner: meta-arm+owner@lists.yoctoproject.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-arm/leave/7218881/3616920/1111825316/xyzzy [jdmason@kudzu.us]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
Denys Dmytriyenko Sept. 12, 2023, 4:16 a.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 12:01:50AM -0400, Jon Mason wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 11:57 PM Jon Mason via lists.yoctoproject.org
> <jdmason=kudzu.us@lists.yoctoproject.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 10 Sep 2023 18:35:50 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > > * oe-core switched to nanbield in:
> > >   https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=f212cb12a0db9c9de5afd3cc89b1331d386e55f6
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Applied, thanks!
> >
> > [1/1] layer.conf: update LAYERSERIES_COMPAT for nanbield
> >       commit: 2d809a7c3511b9fcb71f1b264184e7840a378adc
> 
> Actually, what was included in meta-arm was Khem's patch, not yours
> (though identical patches, his was the one that made it in).  Weird
> that the b4 tooling got confused.  Sorry for the noise.

And I was really wondering about that - which one got in and why exacly?
Jon Mason Sept. 12, 2023, 1:09 p.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 12:16:47AM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 12:01:50AM -0400, Jon Mason wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 11:57 PM Jon Mason via lists.yoctoproject.org
> > <jdmason=kudzu.us@lists.yoctoproject.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, 10 Sep 2023 18:35:50 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > > > * oe-core switched to nanbield in:
> > > >   https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=f212cb12a0db9c9de5afd3cc89b1331d386e55f6
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Applied, thanks!
> > >
> > > [1/1] layer.conf: update LAYERSERIES_COMPAT for nanbield
> > >       commit: 2d809a7c3511b9fcb71f1b264184e7840a378adc
> > 
> > Actually, what was included in meta-arm was Khem's patch, not yours
> > (though identical patches, his was the one that made it in).  Weird
> > that the b4 tooling got confused.  Sorry for the noise.
> 
> And I was really wondering about that - which one got in and why exacly?

This patch was never applied by my scripts, either because it didn't
apply cleanly (doubtful), the git repo was in a weird state when it
landed, or it was simply never seen.  I'm guessing it was the second
one.  Khem's one was seen and pulled it.  So that is why that one got
in over this one.

This probably means I need to revisit the script and make it a little
more sturdy.

> 
> -- 
> Denys
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/meta-arm-bsp/conf/layer.conf b/meta-arm-bsp/conf/layer.conf
index e192a83d..97d9728c 100644
--- a/meta-arm-bsp/conf/layer.conf
+++ b/meta-arm-bsp/conf/layer.conf
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@  BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "meta-arm-bsp"
 BBFILE_PATTERN_meta-arm-bsp = "^${LAYERDIR}/"
 BBFILE_PRIORITY_meta-arm-bsp = "5"
 
-LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_meta-arm-bsp = "mickledore"
+LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_meta-arm-bsp = "nanbield"
 
 LAYERDEPENDS_meta-arm-bsp = "core meta-arm"
 # This won't be used by layerindex-fetch, but works everywhere else
diff --git a/meta-arm-toolchain/conf/layer.conf b/meta-arm-toolchain/conf/layer.conf
index a6f403ec..bce70dac 100644
--- a/meta-arm-toolchain/conf/layer.conf
+++ b/meta-arm-toolchain/conf/layer.conf
@@ -9,4 +9,4 @@  BBFILE_PATTERN_arm-toolchain := "^${LAYERDIR}/"
 BBFILE_PRIORITY_arm-toolchain = "5"
 
 LAYERDEPENDS_arm-toolchain = "core"
-LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_arm-toolchain = "mickledore"
+LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_arm-toolchain = "nanbield"
diff --git a/meta-arm/conf/layer.conf b/meta-arm/conf/layer.conf
index 2b354375..b506af8b 100644
--- a/meta-arm/conf/layer.conf
+++ b/meta-arm/conf/layer.conf
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@  LAYERDEPENDS_meta-arm = " \
     core \
     arm-toolchain \
 "
-LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_meta-arm = "mickledore"
+LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_meta-arm = "nanbield"
 
 # runfvp --console needs telnet, so pull this in for testimage.
 HOSTTOOLS_NONFATAL += "telnet"