| Submitter | Eric BENARD |
|---|---|
| Date | Jan. 12, 2011, 9:20 p.m. |
| Message ID | <1294867230-7827-1-git-send-email-eric@eukrea.com> |
| Download | mbox | patch |
| Permalink | /patch/262/ |
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
Comments
On 01/12/2011 02:20 PM, Eric Bénard wrote: > tested with kernel headers 2.6.31& 2.6.37 : both compile fine. Is there a reason to not switch to 4.5.20, or even newer instead? > > Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard<eric@eukrea.com> > --- > recipes/strace/strace_4.5.14.bb | 3 ++- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/recipes/strace/strace_4.5.14.bb b/recipes/strace/strace_4.5.14.bb > index 33a44ad..395e4ee 100644 > --- a/recipes/strace/strace_4.5.14.bb > +++ b/recipes/strace/strace_4.5.14.bb > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > DESCRIPTION = "strace is a system call tracing tool." > SECTION = "console/utils" > LICENSE = "BSD" > -PR = "r9" > +PR = "r10" > > SRC_URI = "${SOURCEFORGE_MIRROR}/strace/strace-${PV}.tar.bz2 \ > file://glibc-2.5.patch \ > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ SRC_URI = "${SOURCEFORGE_MIRROR}/strace/strace-${PV}.tar.bz2 \ > file://strace-arm-no-cachectl.patch \ > file://strace-dont-include-linux-dirent-h.patch \ > file://mips-sigcontext.patch \ > + file://strace-linux-2.6.32.patch \ > " > > # The strace-4.5.14-avr32.patch conflicts with some other patches.
On 1/12/2011 1:20 PM, Eric Bénard wrote: > tested with kernel headers 2.6.31& 2.6.37 : both compile fine. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard<eric@eukrea.com> I think you forgot to add the patch itself. > --- > recipes/strace/strace_4.5.14.bb | 3 ++- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/recipes/strace/strace_4.5.14.bb b/recipes/strace/strace_4.5.14.bb > index 33a44ad..395e4ee 100644 > --- a/recipes/strace/strace_4.5.14.bb > +++ b/recipes/strace/strace_4.5.14.bb > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > DESCRIPTION = "strace is a system call tracing tool." > SECTION = "console/utils" > LICENSE = "BSD" > -PR = "r9" > +PR = "r10" > > SRC_URI = "${SOURCEFORGE_MIRROR}/strace/strace-${PV}.tar.bz2 \ > file://glibc-2.5.patch \ > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ SRC_URI = "${SOURCEFORGE_MIRROR}/strace/strace-${PV}.tar.bz2 \ > file://strace-arm-no-cachectl.patch \ > file://strace-dont-include-linux-dirent-h.patch \ > file://mips-sigcontext.patch \ > + file://strace-linux-2.6.32.patch \ > " > > # The strace-4.5.14-avr32.patch conflicts with some other patches.
On 13/01/2011 01:30, Tom Rini wrote: > On 01/12/2011 02:20 PM, Eric Bénard wrote: >> tested with kernel headers 2.6.31& 2.6.37 : both compile fine. > > Is there a reason to not switch to 4.5.20, or even newer instead? > I would like to do that but I don't know if 4.5.20 needs patches. Eric
On 13/01/2011 06:49, Khem Raj wrote: > On 1/12/2011 1:20 PM, Eric Bénard wrote: >> tested with kernel headers 2.6.31& 2.6.37 : both compile fine. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard<eric@eukrea.com> > > I think you forgot to add the patch itself. > oops Eric
On 01/13/2011 12:39 AM, Eric Bénard wrote: > On 13/01/2011 01:30, Tom Rini wrote: >> On 01/12/2011 02:20 PM, Eric Bénard wrote: >>> tested with kernel headers 2.6.31& 2.6.37 : both compile fine. >> >> Is there a reason to not switch to 4.5.20, or even newer instead? >> > I would like to do that but I don't know if 4.5.20 needs patches. I haven't tried .37, but it doesn't for .34 (when .14 does). To be clear, I'm suggesting we look at removing the D_P = -1 from .20. My assumption is that since .20 is the latest it probably doesn't need ARM EABI patches (and probably not the SH patches either).
On 13/01/2011 16:13, Tom Rini wrote: > On 01/13/2011 12:39 AM, Eric Bénard wrote: >> On 13/01/2011 01:30, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On 01/12/2011 02:20 PM, Eric Bénard wrote: >>>> tested with kernel headers 2.6.31& 2.6.37 : both compile fine. >>> >>> Is there a reason to not switch to 4.5.20, or even newer instead? >>> >> I would like to do that but I don't know if 4.5.20 needs patches. > > I haven't tried .37, but it doesn't for .34 (when .14 does). To be clear, I'm > suggesting we look at removing the D_P = -1 from .20. My assumption is that > since .20 is the latest it probably doesn't need ARM EABI patches (and > probably not the SH patches either). > OK lets go Eric
Patch
diff --git a/recipes/strace/strace_4.5.14.bb b/recipes/strace/strace_4.5.14.bb index 33a44ad..395e4ee 100644 --- a/recipes/strace/strace_4.5.14.bb +++ b/recipes/strace/strace_4.5.14.bb @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ DESCRIPTION = "strace is a system call tracing tool." SECTION = "console/utils" LICENSE = "BSD" -PR = "r9" +PR = "r10" SRC_URI = "${SOURCEFORGE_MIRROR}/strace/strace-${PV}.tar.bz2 \ file://glibc-2.5.patch \ @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ SRC_URI = "${SOURCEFORGE_MIRROR}/strace/strace-${PV}.tar.bz2 \ file://strace-arm-no-cachectl.patch \ file://strace-dont-include-linux-dirent-h.patch \ file://mips-sigcontext.patch \ + file://strace-linux-2.6.32.patch \ " # The strace-4.5.14-avr32.patch conflicts with some other patches.
tested with kernel headers 2.6.31 & 2.6.37 : both compile fine. Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard <eric@eukrea.com> --- recipes/strace/strace_4.5.14.bb | 3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)