From patchwork Wed May 31 18:45:54 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Peter Marko X-Patchwork-Id: 24925 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBEDC7EE23 for ; Wed, 31 May 2023 18:47:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mta-65-225.siemens.flowmailer.net (mta-65-225.siemens.flowmailer.net [185.136.65.225]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.2460.1685558826111695799 for ; Wed, 31 May 2023 11:47:07 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=peter.marko@siemens.com header.s=fm1 header.b=gCEB1V/F; spf=pass (domain: rts-flowmailer.siemens.com, ip: 185.136.65.225, mailfrom: fm-256628-2023053118470333015370c3622c00d9-cjslwa@rts-flowmailer.siemens.com) Received: by mta-65-225.siemens.flowmailer.net with ESMTPSA id 2023053118470333015370c3622c00d9 for ; Wed, 31 May 2023 20:47:03 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=fm1; d=siemens.com; i=peter.marko@siemens.com; h=Date:From:Subject:To:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc; bh=gVu6pROaV4K8z5OzWj2+rNs+d1x3+3dv+9B/rLHncBk=; b=gCEB1V/FJTX34Cb4SaOLaF6S8+mXDi20Fe9O8VyKtvKruFA94ARcY1P5t/8pXvrtiVd5Ax poDa/LmPJFbSpl7TDWRMtPWjHQ1CSFLnlNuQ0CzKNcISeHhAMi13frKm2aeS7J0/tRqbeVDv UMODrhKZGX8xG8Tkw049xzFQFkBxE=; From: Peter Marko To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Cc: Peter Marko Subject: [OE-core][kirkstone][PATCH] openssl: Upgrade 3.0.8 -> 3.0.9 Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 20:45:54 +0200 Message-Id: <20230531184554.799311-1-peter.marko@siemens.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Flowmailer-Platform: Siemens Feedback-ID: 519:519-256628:519-21489:flowmailer List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from li982-79.members.linode.com [45.33.32.79] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Wed, 31 May 2023 18:47:08 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/182021 From: Peter Marko * fix CVEs CVE-2023-1255 and CVE-2023-2650 * drop CVE patches merged upstream * refresh 0001-Configure-do-not-tweak-mips-cflags.patch https://www.openssl.org/news/openssl-3.0-notes.html Major changes between OpenSSL 3.0.8 and OpenSSL 3.0.9 [30 May 2023] * Mitigate for very slow `OBJ_obj2txt()` performance with gigantic OBJECT IDENTIFIER sub-identities. ([CVE-2023-2650]) * Fixed buffer overread in AES-XTS decryption on ARM 64 bit platforms ([CVE-2023-1255]) * Fixed documentation of X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() ([CVE-2023-0466]) * Fixed handling of invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates ([CVE-2023-0465]) * Limited the number of nodes created in a policy tree ([CVE-2023-0464]) Signed-off-by: Peter Marko --- ...1-Configure-do-not-tweak-mips-cflags.patch | 2 +- .../openssl/openssl/CVE-2023-0464.patch | 225 ------------------ .../openssl/openssl/CVE-2023-0465.patch | 56 ----- .../openssl/openssl/CVE-2023-0466.patch | 50 ---- .../{openssl_3.0.8.bb => openssl_3.0.9.bb} | 5 +- 5 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 336 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/CVE-2023-0464.patch delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/CVE-2023-0465.patch delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/CVE-2023-0466.patch rename meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/{openssl_3.0.8.bb => openssl_3.0.9.bb} (97%) diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/0001-Configure-do-not-tweak-mips-cflags.patch b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/0001-Configure-do-not-tweak-mips-cflags.patch index 0b7abc3a11..af435472a5 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/0001-Configure-do-not-tweak-mips-cflags.patch +++ b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/0001-Configure-do-not-tweak-mips-cflags.patch @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ Index: openssl-3.0.4/Configure } -if ($target =~ /linux.*-mips/ && !$disabled{asm} -- && !grep { $_ !~ /-m(ips|arch=)/ } (@{$config{CFLAGS}})) { +- && !grep { $_ =~ /-m(ips|arch=)/ } (@{$config{CFLAGS}})) { - # minimally required architecture flags for assembly modules - my $value; - $value = '-mips2' if ($target =~ /mips32/); diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/CVE-2023-0464.patch b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/CVE-2023-0464.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 3b94c48e8d..0000000000 --- a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/CVE-2023-0464.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,225 +0,0 @@ -From 959c59c7a0164117e7f8366466a32bb1f8d77ff1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Pauli -Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 15:28:20 +1100 -Subject: [PATCH] x509: excessive resource use verifying policy constraints - -A security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions -of OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains -that include policy constraints. Attackers may be able to exploit this -vulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers -exponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service -(DoS) attack on affected systems. - -Fixes CVE-2023-0464 - -Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz -Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis -(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20568) - -Upstream-Status: Backport from [https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=959c59c7a0164117e7f8366466a32bb1f8d77ff1] -CVE: CVE-2023-0464 -Signed-off-by: Siddharth Doshi ---- - crypto/x509/pcy_local.h | 8 +++++++- - crypto/x509/pcy_node.c | 12 +++++++++--- - crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- - 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) - -diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h b/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h -index 18b53cc..cba107c 100644 ---- a/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h -+++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h -@@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ struct X509_POLICY_LEVEL_st { - }; - - struct X509_POLICY_TREE_st { -+ /* The number of nodes in the tree */ -+ size_t node_count; -+ /* The maximum number of nodes in the tree */ -+ size_t node_maximum; -+ - /* This is the tree 'level' data */ - X509_POLICY_LEVEL *levels; - int nlevel; -@@ -157,7 +162,8 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_tree_find_sk(STACK_OF(X509_POLICY_NODE) *sk, - X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, - X509_POLICY_DATA *data, - X509_POLICY_NODE *parent, -- X509_POLICY_TREE *tree); -+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree, -+ int extra_data); - void ossl_policy_node_free(X509_POLICY_NODE *node); - int ossl_policy_node_match(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lvl, - const X509_POLICY_NODE *node, const ASN1_OBJECT *oid); -diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c b/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c -index 9d9a7ea..450f95a 100644 ---- a/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c -+++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c -@@ -59,10 +59,15 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_find_node(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, - X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, - X509_POLICY_DATA *data, - X509_POLICY_NODE *parent, -- X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) -+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree, -+ int extra_data) - { - X509_POLICY_NODE *node; - -+ /* Verify that the tree isn't too large. This mitigates CVE-2023-0464 */ -+ if (tree->node_maximum > 0 && tree->node_count >= tree->node_maximum) -+ return NULL; -+ - node = OPENSSL_zalloc(sizeof(*node)); - if (node == NULL) { - ERR_raise(ERR_LIB_X509V3, ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE); -@@ -70,7 +75,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, - } - node->data = data; - node->parent = parent; -- if (level) { -+ if (level != NULL) { - if (OBJ_obj2nid(data->valid_policy) == NID_any_policy) { - if (level->anyPolicy) - goto node_error; -@@ -90,7 +95,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, - } - } - -- if (tree) { -+ if (extra_data) { - if (tree->extra_data == NULL) - tree->extra_data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_new_null(); - if (tree->extra_data == NULL){ -@@ -103,6 +108,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, - } - } - -+ tree->node_count++; - if (parent) - parent->nchild++; - -diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c b/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c -index fa45da5..f953a05 100644 ---- a/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c -+++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c -@@ -14,6 +14,17 @@ - - #include "pcy_local.h" - -+/* -+ * If the maximum number of nodes in the policy tree isn't defined, set it to -+ * a generous default of 1000 nodes. -+ * -+ * Defining this to be zero means unlimited policy tree growth which opens the -+ * door on CVE-2023-0464. -+ */ -+#ifndef OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX -+# define OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX 1000 -+#endif -+ - static void expected_print(BIO *channel, - X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lev, X509_POLICY_NODE *node, - int indent) -@@ -163,6 +174,9 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs, - return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL; - } - -+ /* Limit the growth of the tree to mitigate CVE-2023-0464 */ -+ tree->node_maximum = OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX; -+ - /* - * http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#section-6.1.2, figure 3. - * -@@ -180,7 +194,7 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs, - if ((data = ossl_policy_data_new(NULL, - OBJ_nid2obj(NID_any_policy), 0)) == NULL) - goto bad_tree; -- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree) == NULL) { -+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree, 1) == NULL) { - ossl_policy_data_free(data); - goto bad_tree; - } -@@ -239,7 +253,8 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs, - * Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise - */ - static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, -- X509_POLICY_DATA *data) -+ X509_POLICY_DATA *data, -+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) - { - X509_POLICY_LEVEL *last = curr - 1; - int i, matched = 0; -@@ -249,13 +264,13 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, - X509_POLICY_NODE *node = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_value(last->nodes, i); - - if (ossl_policy_node_match(last, node, data->valid_policy)) { -- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, NULL) == NULL) -+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 0) == NULL) - return 0; - matched = 1; - } - } - if (!matched && last->anyPolicy) { -- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL) -+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL) - return 0; - } - return 1; -@@ -268,7 +283,8 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, - * Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise. - */ - static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, -- const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache) -+ const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache, -+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) - { - int i; - -@@ -276,7 +292,7 @@ static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, - X509_POLICY_DATA *data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_value(cache->data, i); - - /* Look for matching nodes in previous level */ -- if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data)) -+ if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data, tree)) - return 0; - } - return 1; -@@ -307,7 +323,7 @@ static int tree_add_unmatched(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, - /* Curr may not have anyPolicy */ - data->qualifier_set = cache->anyPolicy->qualifier_set; - data->flags |= POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS; -- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree) == NULL) { -+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 1) == NULL) { - ossl_policy_data_free(data); - return 0; - } -@@ -370,7 +386,7 @@ static int tree_link_any(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, - /* Finally add link to anyPolicy */ - if (last->anyPolicy && - ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, cache->anyPolicy, -- last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL) -+ last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL) - return 0; - return 1; - } -@@ -553,7 +569,7 @@ static int tree_calculate_user_set(X509_POLICY_TREE *tree, - extra->flags = POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS - | POLICY_DATA_FLAG_EXTRA_NODE; - node = ossl_policy_level_add_node(NULL, extra, anyPolicy->parent, -- tree); -+ tree, 1); - } - if (!tree->user_policies) { - tree->user_policies = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_new_null(); -@@ -580,7 +596,7 @@ static int tree_evaluate(X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) - - for (i = 1; i < tree->nlevel; i++, curr++) { - cache = ossl_policy_cache_set(curr->cert); -- if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache)) -+ if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache, tree)) - return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL; - - if (!(curr->flags & X509_V_FLAG_INHIBIT_ANY) --- -2.35.7 - diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/CVE-2023-0465.patch b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/CVE-2023-0465.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 57fd494464..0000000000 --- a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/CVE-2023-0465.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,56 +0,0 @@ -From 1dd43e0709fece299b15208f36cc7c76209ba0bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Matt Caswell -Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 16:52:55 +0000 -Subject: [PATCH] Ensure that EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY is checked even in leaf - certs - -Even though we check the leaf cert to confirm it is valid, we -later ignored the invalid flag and did not notice that the leaf -cert was bad. - -Fixes: CVE-2023-0465 - -Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau -Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz -(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20587) - -Upstream-Status: Backport from [https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=1dd43e0709fece299b15208f36cc7c76209ba0bb] -CVE: CVE-2023-0465 -Signed-off-by: Siddharth Doshi ---- - crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c | 12 ++++++++++-- - 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) - -diff --git a/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c b/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c -index 9384f1d..a0282c3 100644 ---- a/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c -+++ b/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c -@@ -1654,15 +1654,23 @@ static int check_policy(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx) - goto memerr; - /* Invalid or inconsistent extensions */ - if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_INVALID) { -- int i; -+ int i, cbcalled = 0; - - /* Locate certificates with bad extensions and notify callback. */ -- for (i = 1; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) { -+ for (i = 0; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) { - X509 *x = sk_X509_value(ctx->chain, i); - -+ if ((x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY) != 0) -+ cbcalled = 1; - CB_FAIL_IF((x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY) != 0, - ctx, x, i, X509_V_ERR_INVALID_POLICY_EXTENSION); - } -+ if (!cbcalled) { -+ /* Should not be able to get here */ -+ ERR_raise(ERR_LIB_X509, ERR_R_INTERNAL_ERROR); -+ return 0; -+ } -+ /* The callback ignored the error so we return success */ - return 1; - } - if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_FAILURE) { --- -2.35.7 - diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/CVE-2023-0466.patch b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/CVE-2023-0466.patch deleted file mode 100644 index a16bfe42ca..0000000000 --- a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/CVE-2023-0466.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,50 +0,0 @@ -From 51e8a84ce742db0f6c70510d0159dad8f7825908 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Tomas Mraz -Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 16:15:47 +0100 -Subject: [PATCH] Fix documentation of X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() - -The function was incorrectly documented as enabling policy checking. - -Fixes: CVE-2023-0466 - -Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell -Reviewed-by: Paul Dale -(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20563) - -Upstream-Status: Backport from [https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=51e8a84ce742db0f6c70510d0159dad8f7825908] -CVE: CVE-2023-0466 -Signed-off-by: Siddharth Doshi ---- - doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod | 9 +++++++-- - 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) - -diff --git a/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod b/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod -index 75a1677..43c1900 100644 ---- a/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod -+++ b/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod -@@ -98,8 +98,9 @@ B. - X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_time() sets the verification time in B to - B. Normally the current time is used. - --X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() enables policy checking (it is disabled --by default) and adds B to the acceptable policy set. -+X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() adds B to the acceptable policy set. -+Contrary to preexisting documentation of this function it does not enable -+policy checking. - - X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies() enables policy checking (it is disabled - by default) and sets the acceptable policy set to B. Any existing -@@ -400,6 +401,10 @@ The X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get_hostflags() function was added in OpenSSL 1.1.0i. - The X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get0_host(), X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get0_email(), - and X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get1_ip_asc() functions were added in OpenSSL 3.0. - -+The function X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() was historically documented as -+enabling policy checking however the implementation has never done this. -+The documentation was changed to align with the implementation. -+ - =head1 COPYRIGHT - - Copyright 2009-2023 The OpenSSL Project Authors. All Rights Reserved. --- -2.35.7 - diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_3.0.8.bb b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_3.0.9.bb similarity index 97% rename from meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_3.0.8.bb rename to meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_3.0.9.bb index 82f3e18dd7..849bd7e5a6 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_3.0.8.bb +++ b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_3.0.9.bb @@ -12,16 +12,13 @@ SRC_URI = "http://www.openssl.org/source/openssl-${PV}.tar.gz \ file://0001-buildinfo-strip-sysroot-and-debug-prefix-map-from-co.patch \ file://afalg.patch \ file://0001-Configure-do-not-tweak-mips-cflags.patch \ - file://CVE-2023-0464.patch \ - file://CVE-2023-0465.patch \ - file://CVE-2023-0466.patch \ " SRC_URI:append:class-nativesdk = " \ file://environment.d-openssl.sh \ " -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "6c13d2bf38fdf31eac3ce2a347073673f5d63263398f1f69d0df4a41253e4b3e" +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "eb1ab04781474360f77c318ab89d8c5a03abc38e63d65a603cabbf1b00a1dc90" inherit lib_package multilib_header multilib_script ptest perlnative MULTILIB_SCRIPTS = "${PN}-bin:${bindir}/c_rehash"