@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ Index: openssl-3.0.4/Configure
}
-if ($target =~ /linux.*-mips/ && !$disabled{asm}
-- && !grep { $_ !~ /-m(ips|arch=)/ } (@{$config{CFLAGS}})) {
+- && !grep { $_ =~ /-m(ips|arch=)/ } (@{$config{CFLAGS}})) {
- # minimally required architecture flags for assembly modules
- my $value;
- $value = '-mips2' if ($target =~ /mips32/);
deleted file mode 100644
@@ -1,225 +0,0 @@
-From 959c59c7a0164117e7f8366466a32bb1f8d77ff1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Pauli <pauli@openssl.org>
-Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 15:28:20 +1100
-Subject: [PATCH] x509: excessive resource use verifying policy constraints
-
-A security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions
-of OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains
-that include policy constraints. Attackers may be able to exploit this
-vulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers
-exponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service
-(DoS) attack on affected systems.
-
-Fixes CVE-2023-0464
-
-Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
-Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
-(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20568)
-
-Upstream-Status: Backport from [https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=959c59c7a0164117e7f8366466a32bb1f8d77ff1]
-CVE: CVE-2023-0464
-Signed-off-by: Siddharth Doshi <sdoshi@mvista.com>
----
- crypto/x509/pcy_local.h | 8 +++++++-
- crypto/x509/pcy_node.c | 12 +++++++++---
- crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
- 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h b/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h
-index 18b53cc..cba107c 100644
---- a/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h
-+++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h
-@@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ struct X509_POLICY_LEVEL_st {
- };
-
- struct X509_POLICY_TREE_st {
-+ /* The number of nodes in the tree */
-+ size_t node_count;
-+ /* The maximum number of nodes in the tree */
-+ size_t node_maximum;
-+
- /* This is the tree 'level' data */
- X509_POLICY_LEVEL *levels;
- int nlevel;
-@@ -157,7 +162,8 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_tree_find_sk(STACK_OF(X509_POLICY_NODE) *sk,
- X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
- X509_POLICY_DATA *data,
- X509_POLICY_NODE *parent,
-- X509_POLICY_TREE *tree);
-+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree,
-+ int extra_data);
- void ossl_policy_node_free(X509_POLICY_NODE *node);
- int ossl_policy_node_match(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lvl,
- const X509_POLICY_NODE *node, const ASN1_OBJECT *oid);
-diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c b/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c
-index 9d9a7ea..450f95a 100644
---- a/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c
-+++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c
-@@ -59,10 +59,15 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_find_node(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
- X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
- X509_POLICY_DATA *data,
- X509_POLICY_NODE *parent,
-- X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
-+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree,
-+ int extra_data)
- {
- X509_POLICY_NODE *node;
-
-+ /* Verify that the tree isn't too large. This mitigates CVE-2023-0464 */
-+ if (tree->node_maximum > 0 && tree->node_count >= tree->node_maximum)
-+ return NULL;
-+
- node = OPENSSL_zalloc(sizeof(*node));
- if (node == NULL) {
- ERR_raise(ERR_LIB_X509V3, ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE);
-@@ -70,7 +75,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
- }
- node->data = data;
- node->parent = parent;
-- if (level) {
-+ if (level != NULL) {
- if (OBJ_obj2nid(data->valid_policy) == NID_any_policy) {
- if (level->anyPolicy)
- goto node_error;
-@@ -90,7 +95,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
- }
- }
-
-- if (tree) {
-+ if (extra_data) {
- if (tree->extra_data == NULL)
- tree->extra_data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_new_null();
- if (tree->extra_data == NULL){
-@@ -103,6 +108,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
- }
- }
-
-+ tree->node_count++;
- if (parent)
- parent->nchild++;
-
-diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c b/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c
-index fa45da5..f953a05 100644
---- a/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c
-+++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c
-@@ -14,6 +14,17 @@
-
- #include "pcy_local.h"
-
-+/*
-+ * If the maximum number of nodes in the policy tree isn't defined, set it to
-+ * a generous default of 1000 nodes.
-+ *
-+ * Defining this to be zero means unlimited policy tree growth which opens the
-+ * door on CVE-2023-0464.
-+ */
-+#ifndef OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX
-+# define OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX 1000
-+#endif
-+
- static void expected_print(BIO *channel,
- X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lev, X509_POLICY_NODE *node,
- int indent)
-@@ -163,6 +174,9 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs,
- return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL;
- }
-
-+ /* Limit the growth of the tree to mitigate CVE-2023-0464 */
-+ tree->node_maximum = OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX;
-+
- /*
- * http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#section-6.1.2, figure 3.
- *
-@@ -180,7 +194,7 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs,
- if ((data = ossl_policy_data_new(NULL,
- OBJ_nid2obj(NID_any_policy), 0)) == NULL)
- goto bad_tree;
-- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree) == NULL) {
-+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree, 1) == NULL) {
- ossl_policy_data_free(data);
- goto bad_tree;
- }
-@@ -239,7 +253,8 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs,
- * Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise
- */
- static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
-- X509_POLICY_DATA *data)
-+ X509_POLICY_DATA *data,
-+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
- {
- X509_POLICY_LEVEL *last = curr - 1;
- int i, matched = 0;
-@@ -249,13 +264,13 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
- X509_POLICY_NODE *node = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_value(last->nodes, i);
-
- if (ossl_policy_node_match(last, node, data->valid_policy)) {
-- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, NULL) == NULL)
-+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 0) == NULL)
- return 0;
- matched = 1;
- }
- }
- if (!matched && last->anyPolicy) {
-- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL)
-+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL)
- return 0;
- }
- return 1;
-@@ -268,7 +283,8 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
- * Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise.
- */
- static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
-- const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache)
-+ const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache,
-+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
- {
- int i;
-
-@@ -276,7 +292,7 @@ static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
- X509_POLICY_DATA *data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_value(cache->data, i);
-
- /* Look for matching nodes in previous level */
-- if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data))
-+ if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data, tree))
- return 0;
- }
- return 1;
-@@ -307,7 +323,7 @@ static int tree_add_unmatched(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
- /* Curr may not have anyPolicy */
- data->qualifier_set = cache->anyPolicy->qualifier_set;
- data->flags |= POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS;
-- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree) == NULL) {
-+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 1) == NULL) {
- ossl_policy_data_free(data);
- return 0;
- }
-@@ -370,7 +386,7 @@ static int tree_link_any(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
- /* Finally add link to anyPolicy */
- if (last->anyPolicy &&
- ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, cache->anyPolicy,
-- last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL)
-+ last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL)
- return 0;
- return 1;
- }
-@@ -553,7 +569,7 @@ static int tree_calculate_user_set(X509_POLICY_TREE *tree,
- extra->flags = POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS
- | POLICY_DATA_FLAG_EXTRA_NODE;
- node = ossl_policy_level_add_node(NULL, extra, anyPolicy->parent,
-- tree);
-+ tree, 1);
- }
- if (!tree->user_policies) {
- tree->user_policies = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_new_null();
-@@ -580,7 +596,7 @@ static int tree_evaluate(X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
-
- for (i = 1; i < tree->nlevel; i++, curr++) {
- cache = ossl_policy_cache_set(curr->cert);
-- if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache))
-+ if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache, tree))
- return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL;
-
- if (!(curr->flags & X509_V_FLAG_INHIBIT_ANY)
-2.35.7
-
deleted file mode 100644
@@ -1,56 +0,0 @@
-From 1dd43e0709fece299b15208f36cc7c76209ba0bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 16:52:55 +0000
-Subject: [PATCH] Ensure that EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY is checked even in leaf
- certs
-
-Even though we check the leaf cert to confirm it is valid, we
-later ignored the invalid flag and did not notice that the leaf
-cert was bad.
-
-Fixes: CVE-2023-0465
-
-Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
-Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
-(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20587)
-
-Upstream-Status: Backport from [https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=1dd43e0709fece299b15208f36cc7c76209ba0bb]
-CVE: CVE-2023-0465
-Signed-off-by: Siddharth Doshi <sdoshi@mvista.com>
----
- crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c | 12 ++++++++++--
- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c b/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c
-index 9384f1d..a0282c3 100644
---- a/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c
-+++ b/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c
-@@ -1654,15 +1654,23 @@ static int check_policy(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx)
- goto memerr;
- /* Invalid or inconsistent extensions */
- if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_INVALID) {
-- int i;
-+ int i, cbcalled = 0;
-
- /* Locate certificates with bad extensions and notify callback. */
-- for (i = 1; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) {
-+ for (i = 0; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) {
- X509 *x = sk_X509_value(ctx->chain, i);
-
-+ if ((x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY) != 0)
-+ cbcalled = 1;
- CB_FAIL_IF((x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY) != 0,
- ctx, x, i, X509_V_ERR_INVALID_POLICY_EXTENSION);
- }
-+ if (!cbcalled) {
-+ /* Should not be able to get here */
-+ ERR_raise(ERR_LIB_X509, ERR_R_INTERNAL_ERROR);
-+ return 0;
-+ }
-+ /* The callback ignored the error so we return success */
- return 1;
- }
- if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_FAILURE) {
-2.35.7
-
deleted file mode 100644
@@ -1,50 +0,0 @@
-From 51e8a84ce742db0f6c70510d0159dad8f7825908 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 16:15:47 +0100
-Subject: [PATCH] Fix documentation of X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy()
-
-The function was incorrectly documented as enabling policy checking.
-
-Fixes: CVE-2023-0466
-
-Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
-(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20563)
-
-Upstream-Status: Backport from [https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=51e8a84ce742db0f6c70510d0159dad8f7825908]
-CVE: CVE-2023-0466
-Signed-off-by: Siddharth Doshi <sdoshi@mvista.com>
----
- doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod | 9 +++++++--
- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod b/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod
-index 75a1677..43c1900 100644
---- a/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod
-+++ b/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod
-@@ -98,8 +98,9 @@ B<trust>.
- X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_time() sets the verification time in B<param> to
- B<t>. Normally the current time is used.
-
--X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() enables policy checking (it is disabled
--by default) and adds B<policy> to the acceptable policy set.
-+X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() adds B<policy> to the acceptable policy set.
-+Contrary to preexisting documentation of this function it does not enable
-+policy checking.
-
- X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies() enables policy checking (it is disabled
- by default) and sets the acceptable policy set to B<policies>. Any existing
-@@ -400,6 +401,10 @@ The X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get_hostflags() function was added in OpenSSL 1.1.0i.
- The X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get0_host(), X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get0_email(),
- and X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get1_ip_asc() functions were added in OpenSSL 3.0.
-
-+The function X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() was historically documented as
-+enabling policy checking however the implementation has never done this.
-+The documentation was changed to align with the implementation.
-+
- =head1 COPYRIGHT
-
- Copyright 2009-2023 The OpenSSL Project Authors. All Rights Reserved.
-2.35.7
-
similarity index 97%
rename from meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_3.0.8.bb
rename to meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_3.0.9.bb
@@ -12,16 +12,13 @@ SRC_URI = "http://www.openssl.org/source/openssl-${PV}.tar.gz \
file://0001-buildinfo-strip-sysroot-and-debug-prefix-map-from-co.patch \
file://afalg.patch \
file://0001-Configure-do-not-tweak-mips-cflags.patch \
- file://CVE-2023-0464.patch \
- file://CVE-2023-0465.patch \
- file://CVE-2023-0466.patch \
"
SRC_URI:append:class-nativesdk = " \
file://environment.d-openssl.sh \
"
-SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "6c13d2bf38fdf31eac3ce2a347073673f5d63263398f1f69d0df4a41253e4b3e"
+SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "eb1ab04781474360f77c318ab89d8c5a03abc38e63d65a603cabbf1b00a1dc90"
inherit lib_package multilib_header multilib_script ptest perlnative
MULTILIB_SCRIPTS = "${PN}-bin:${bindir}/c_rehash"