Patchwork [meta-oe] giflib: Move to OE-Core

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Samuel Stirtzel
Date March 21, 2012, 2:17 p.m.
Message ID <1332339451-26902-1-git-send-email-s.stirtzel@googlemail.com>
Download mbox | patch
Permalink /patch/24013/
State Superseded, archived
Headers show

Comments

Samuel Stirtzel - March 21, 2012, 2:17 p.m.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Stirtzel <s.stirtzel@googlemail.com>
---
 meta-oe/recipes-devtools/giflib/giflib_4.1.6.bb |   20 --------------------
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-devtools/giflib/giflib_4.1.6.bb
Samuel Stirtzel - March 21, 2012, 2:21 p.m.
Seems like my commit message got lost sorry,
this was requested from a tester of meta-kde who doesn't use meta-openembedded.

2012/3/21 Samuel Stirtzel <s.stirtzel@googlemail.com>:
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Stirtzel <s.stirtzel@googlemail.com>
> ---
>  meta-oe/recipes-devtools/giflib/giflib_4.1.6.bb |   20 --------------------
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-devtools/giflib/giflib_4.1.6.bb
>
> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/giflib/giflib_4.1.6.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/giflib/giflib_4.1.6.bb
> deleted file mode 100644
> index bd7b495..0000000
> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/giflib/giflib_4.1.6.bb
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
> -DESCRIPTION = "shared library for GIF images"
> -SECTION = "libs"
> -LICENSE = "MIT"
> -LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=ae11c61b04b2917be39b11f78d71519a"
> -PR = "r2"
> -
> -SRC_URI = "${SOURCEFORGE_MIRROR}/giflib/${BP}.tar.bz2"
> -
> -inherit autotools
> -
> -DEPENDS = "libsm"
> -
> -PACKAGES += "${PN}-utils"
> -FILES_${PN} = "${libdir}/libgif.so.*"
> -FILES_${PN}-utils = "${bindir}"
> -
> -BBCLASSEXTEND = "native"
> -
> -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "7125644155ae6ad33dbc9fc15a14735f"
> -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "e1c1ced9c5bc8f93ef0faf0a8c7717abf784d10a7b270d2285e8e1f3b93f2bed"
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
Koen Kooi - March 21, 2012, 9:09 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Op 21-03-12 15:17, Samuel Stirtzel schreef:
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Stirtzel <s.stirtzel@googlemail.com>

OE-core needs to slim down, not get fatter. You are basically saying "layer
suck, let's move back to oe-classic"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
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=1Xye
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Samuel Stirtzel - March 22, 2012, 9:24 a.m.
2012/3/21 Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Op 21-03-12 15:17, Samuel Stirtzel schreef:
>> Signed-off-by: Samuel Stirtzel <s.stirtzel@googlemail.com>
>
> OE-core needs to slim down, not get fatter. You are basically saying "layer
> suck, let's move back to oe-classic"

That is definitively not what I want to say.
In my point of view there is no value in maintaining an existing
recipe redundantly in meta-oe and kde-core or anywhere else.


And IMHO we need to get over this, how is it supposed to work?
Should I make a meta-devtools layer?
Or should I copy giflib from meta-oe and all recipes from oe-core that
meta-kde depends on over to my own layer?

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPakOkAAoJEHZqAkdh1vT6zyQP/R7/viIEf4trbFzR3ZaD2cRd
> D4U4q7eDF5DM/fC85yoLBj7byBfryB/I2JWDir9YOAcGgaBysvpL5vApTWFt1hJZ
> MOc3NFNdIsALL/jnMzjmY4OB5bIAYHj4nC0XGiRj6CuEvkyz6IueAAR3k2O6NU64
> L32Ou0iGD0GKg6gl8LSBfixVKYAjIFfehP5rWv1L0P7cJiYmVy4Gj7CalmmRpPZz
> zMhmwoUze4dIx9z6X5WSIXs44aBOFs3MZjtYRfBQsUDkjBheLWI5tMIekhFX0Ega
> wKjU9GUwerPzI0oI2DG+9n7nS1wlBJesrHAQKh3pwCWRC19NQuqFjArdaF80DwPk
> ZHZNnTzB5Dd/NbPcSkRG5V0DAFYB54Xty6A2w7ONbPoQs5h3vjS4g8V560Kvgqaa
> O/efrZi2VgYA/1RAaz7COjNkMF/OBeH9aE9oRNPweOBYcwMFzhbrTEXPUL/pZ7gg
> 5oI0JdJj5lmqi6q9+jk8hDVJvYIkM45l9xqy6nDnIa0tUnDTzCRxj+jr7LEyPp/R
> p+/6GO5aPG8S4JPbmgFbmJN7hrLzNyg6JS962VVYiOhw0cIVwkj/hX+9oYPE4pRe
> AHXoBtWrfflkL4RIadYI64uMJHNpHzfuzd6+0JljL8sA969nh36GXsd4OwMdUx6b
> AVqAIeCDYo30C3i9BXRL
> =1Xye
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Martin Jansa - March 22, 2012, 9:28 a.m.
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:24:38AM +0100, Samuel Stirtzel wrote:
> 2012/3/21 Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Op 21-03-12 15:17, Samuel Stirtzel schreef:
> >> Signed-off-by: Samuel Stirtzel <s.stirtzel@googlemail.com>
> >
> > OE-core needs to slim down, not get fatter. You are basically saying "layer
> > suck, let's move back to oe-classic"
> 
> That is definitively not what I want to say.
> In my point of view there is no value in maintaining an existing
> recipe redundantly in meta-oe and kde-core or anywhere else.
> 
> 
> And IMHO we need to get over this, how is it supposed to work?
> Should I make a meta-devtools layer?
> Or should I copy giflib from meta-oe and all recipes from oe-core that
> meta-kde depends on over to my own layer?

why not add meta-oe dependency to meta-kde/README?

> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
> > Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
> >
> > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPakOkAAoJEHZqAkdh1vT6zyQP/R7/viIEf4trbFzR3ZaD2cRd
> > D4U4q7eDF5DM/fC85yoLBj7byBfryB/I2JWDir9YOAcGgaBysvpL5vApTWFt1hJZ
> > MOc3NFNdIsALL/jnMzjmY4OB5bIAYHj4nC0XGiRj6CuEvkyz6IueAAR3k2O6NU64
> > L32Ou0iGD0GKg6gl8LSBfixVKYAjIFfehP5rWv1L0P7cJiYmVy4Gj7CalmmRpPZz
> > zMhmwoUze4dIx9z6X5WSIXs44aBOFs3MZjtYRfBQsUDkjBheLWI5tMIekhFX0Ega
> > wKjU9GUwerPzI0oI2DG+9n7nS1wlBJesrHAQKh3pwCWRC19NQuqFjArdaF80DwPk
> > ZHZNnTzB5Dd/NbPcSkRG5V0DAFYB54Xty6A2w7ONbPoQs5h3vjS4g8V560Kvgqaa
> > O/efrZi2VgYA/1RAaz7COjNkMF/OBeH9aE9oRNPweOBYcwMFzhbrTEXPUL/pZ7gg
> > 5oI0JdJj5lmqi6q9+jk8hDVJvYIkM45l9xqy6nDnIa0tUnDTzCRxj+jr7LEyPp/R
> > p+/6GO5aPG8S4JPbmgFbmJN7hrLzNyg6JS962VVYiOhw0cIVwkj/hX+9oYPE4pRe
> > AHXoBtWrfflkL4RIadYI64uMJHNpHzfuzd6+0JljL8sA969nh36GXsd4OwMdUx6b
> > AVqAIeCDYo30C3i9BXRL
> > =1Xye
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-devel mailing list
> > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards
> Samuel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Samuel Stirtzel - March 22, 2012, 9:35 a.m.
2012/3/22 Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:24:38AM +0100, Samuel Stirtzel wrote:
>> 2012/3/21 Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>:
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> > Op 21-03-12 15:17, Samuel Stirtzel schreef:
>> >> Signed-off-by: Samuel Stirtzel <s.stirtzel@googlemail.com>
>> >
>> > OE-core needs to slim down, not get fatter. You are basically saying "layer
>> > suck, let's move back to oe-classic"
>>
>> That is definitively not what I want to say.
>> In my point of view there is no value in maintaining an existing
>> recipe redundantly in meta-oe and kde-core or anywhere else.
>>
>>
>> And IMHO we need to get over this, how is it supposed to work?
>> Should I make a meta-devtools layer?
>> Or should I copy giflib from meta-oe and all recipes from oe-core that
>> meta-kde depends on over to my own layer?
>
> why not add meta-oe dependency to meta-kde/README?

It is already listed as dependency [1].
But somehow it seems like that there are users, interested in testing
this layer, with an use case which excludes the meta-oe layer.



>
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
>> > Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>> >
>> > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPakOkAAoJEHZqAkdh1vT6zyQP/R7/viIEf4trbFzR3ZaD2cRd
>> > D4U4q7eDF5DM/fC85yoLBj7byBfryB/I2JWDir9YOAcGgaBysvpL5vApTWFt1hJZ
>> > MOc3NFNdIsALL/jnMzjmY4OB5bIAYHj4nC0XGiRj6CuEvkyz6IueAAR3k2O6NU64
>> > L32Ou0iGD0GKg6gl8LSBfixVKYAjIFfehP5rWv1L0P7cJiYmVy4Gj7CalmmRpPZz
>> > zMhmwoUze4dIx9z6X5WSIXs44aBOFs3MZjtYRfBQsUDkjBheLWI5tMIekhFX0Ega
>> > wKjU9GUwerPzI0oI2DG+9n7nS1wlBJesrHAQKh3pwCWRC19NQuqFjArdaF80DwPk
>> > ZHZNnTzB5Dd/NbPcSkRG5V0DAFYB54Xty6A2w7ONbPoQs5h3vjS4g8V560Kvgqaa
>> > O/efrZi2VgYA/1RAaz7COjNkMF/OBeH9aE9oRNPweOBYcwMFzhbrTEXPUL/pZ7gg
>> > 5oI0JdJj5lmqi6q9+jk8hDVJvYIkM45l9xqy6nDnIa0tUnDTzCRxj+jr7LEyPp/R
>> > p+/6GO5aPG8S4JPbmgFbmJN7hrLzNyg6JS962VVYiOhw0cIVwkj/hX+9oYPE4pRe
>> > AHXoBtWrfflkL4RIadYI64uMJHNpHzfuzd6+0JljL8sA969nh36GXsd4OwMdUx6b
>> > AVqAIeCDYo30C3i9BXRL
>> > =1Xye
>> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Openembedded-devel mailing list
>> > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
>> > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards
>> Samuel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>
> --
> Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>

[1] https://gitorious.org/openembedded-core-layers/meta-kde/blobs/master/README#line4
Eric BENARD - March 22, 2012, 9:40 a.m.
Le Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:35:31 +0100,
Samuel Stirtzel <s.stirtzel@googlemail.com> a écrit :
> 2012/3/22 Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>:
> > why not add meta-oe dependency to meta-kde/README?
> 
> It is already listed as dependency [1].
> But somehow it seems like that there are users, interested in testing
> this layer, with an use case which excludes the meta-oe layer.
> 
>
can you describe this use case so that meta-oe gets a chance to adapt.

One problem I can see with meta-oe is the fact that it makes changes to
the oe-core toolchain : that would be great to put all the toolchain
changes in a meta-toolchain (but I think that's what is scheduled with
meta-linaro).

Eric
Koen Kooi - March 22, 2012, 9:42 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Op 22-03-12 10:40, Eric Bénard schreef:
> Le Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:35:31 +0100, Samuel Stirtzel
> <s.stirtzel@googlemail.com> a écrit :
>> 2012/3/22 Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>:
>>> why not add meta-oe dependency to meta-kde/README?
>> 
>> It is already listed as dependency [1]. But somehow it seems like that
>> there are users, interested in testing this layer, with an use case
>> which excludes the meta-oe layer.
>> 
>> 
> can you describe this use case so that meta-oe gets a chance to adapt.
> 
> One problem I can see with meta-oe is the fact that it makes changes to 
> the oe-core toolchain : that would be great to put all the toolchain 
> changes in a meta-toolchain (but I think that's what is scheduled with 
> meta-linaro).

In the mean time I bet Khem would love to have people sending patches to
move the toolchain bits to a meta-toolchain layer inside the
meta-openembedded repo.

regards,

Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
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=Rz9p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Eric BENARD - March 22, 2012, 9:45 a.m.
Le Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:42:33 +0100,
Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net> a écrit :

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Op 22-03-12 10:40, Eric Bénard schreef:
> > Le Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:35:31 +0100, Samuel Stirtzel
> > <s.stirtzel@googlemail.com> a écrit :
> >> 2012/3/22 Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>:
> >>> why not add meta-oe dependency to meta-kde/README?
> >> 
> >> It is already listed as dependency [1]. But somehow it seems like that
> >> there are users, interested in testing this layer, with an use case
> >> which excludes the meta-oe layer.
> >> 
> >> 
> > can you describe this use case so that meta-oe gets a chance to adapt.
> > 
> > One problem I can see with meta-oe is the fact that it makes changes to 
> > the oe-core toolchain : that would be great to put all the toolchain 
> > changes in a meta-toolchain (but I think that's what is scheduled with 
> > meta-linaro).
> 
> In the mean time I bet Khem would love to have people sending patches to
> move the toolchain bits to a meta-toolchain layer inside the
> meta-openembedded repo.
> 
ok so expect patches by this weekend for this point.

Eric
Koen Kooi - March 22, 2012, 10:02 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Op 22-03-12 10:45, Eric Bénard schreef:
> Le Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:42:33 +0100, Koen Kooi
> <koen@dominion.thruhere.net> a écrit :
> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> Op 22-03-12 10:40, Eric Bénard schreef:
>>> Le Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:35:31 +0100, Samuel Stirtzel 
>>> <s.stirtzel@googlemail.com> a écrit :
>>>> 2012/3/22 Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>:
>>>>> why not add meta-oe dependency to meta-kde/README?
>>>> 
>>>> It is already listed as dependency [1]. But somehow it seems like
>>>> that there are users, interested in testing this layer, with an use
>>>> case which excludes the meta-oe layer.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> can you describe this use case so that meta-oe gets a chance to
>>> adapt.
>>> 
>>> One problem I can see with meta-oe is the fact that it makes changes
>>> to the oe-core toolchain : that would be great to put all the
>>> toolchain changes in a meta-toolchain (but I think that's what is
>>> scheduled with meta-linaro).
>> 
>> In the mean time I bet Khem would love to have people sending patches
>> to move the toolchain bits to a meta-toolchain layer inside the 
>> meta-openembedded repo.
>> 
> ok so expect patches by this weekend for this point.

I sent an RFC patch to get some more peoples attention :)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
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=dGZ8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Samuel Stirtzel - March 22, 2012, 10:12 a.m.
2012/3/22 Eric Bénard <eric@eukrea.com>:
> Le Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:35:31 +0100,
> Samuel Stirtzel <s.stirtzel@googlemail.com> a écrit :
>> 2012/3/22 Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>:
>> > why not add meta-oe dependency to meta-kde/README?
>>
>> It is already listed as dependency [1].
>> But somehow it seems like that there are users, interested in testing
>> this layer, with an use case which excludes the meta-oe layer.
>>
>>
> can you describe this use case so that meta-oe gets a chance to adapt.

Since I have the common use case of the installation provided from the
setup-scripts and I don't know the exact use case,
I cannot provide this information myself right now.


This "only" involves me as I was requested to add a copy of the giflib
recipe to meta-kde,
to support the testing of meta-kde with a non meta-oe use case.

Since I don't think that recipe redundancy will be of any use, I
suggested to move giflib to oe-core.

>
> One problem I can see with meta-oe is the fact that it makes changes to
> the oe-core toolchain : that would be great to put all the toolchain
> changes in a meta-toolchain (but I think that's what is scheduled with
> meta-linaro).
>
> Eric
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Koen Kooi - March 22, 2012, 11:28 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Op 22-03-12 11:12, Samuel Stirtzel schreef:
> 2012/3/22 Eric Bénard <eric@eukrea.com>:
>> Le Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:35:31 +0100, Samuel Stirtzel
>> <s.stirtzel@googlemail.com> a écrit :
>>> 2012/3/22 Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>:
>>>> why not add meta-oe dependency to meta-kde/README?
>>> 
>>> It is already listed as dependency [1]. But somehow it seems like
>>> that there are users, interested in testing this layer, with an use
>>> case which excludes the meta-oe layer.
>>> 
>>> 
>> can you describe this use case so that meta-oe gets a chance to adapt.
> 
> Since I have the common use case of the installation provided from the 
> setup-scripts and I don't know the exact use case, I cannot provide this
> information myself right now.

So you can't explain why it should move to oe-core, that should be enough to
NAK this patch without even looking at it.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
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=EYSh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Samuel Stirtzel - March 22, 2012, 11:38 a.m.
2012/3/22 Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Op 22-03-12 11:12, Samuel Stirtzel schreef:
>> 2012/3/22 Eric Bénard <eric@eukrea.com>:
>>> Le Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:35:31 +0100, Samuel Stirtzel
>>> <s.stirtzel@googlemail.com> a écrit :
>>>> 2012/3/22 Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>:
>>>>> why not add meta-oe dependency to meta-kde/README?
>>>>
>>>> It is already listed as dependency [1]. But somehow it seems like
>>>> that there are users, interested in testing this layer, with an use
>>>> case which excludes the meta-oe layer.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> can you describe this use case so that meta-oe gets a chance to adapt.
>>
>> Since I have the common use case of the installation provided from the
>> setup-scripts and I don't know the exact use case, I cannot provide this
>> information myself right now.
>
> So you can't explain why it should move to oe-core, that should be enough to
> NAK this patch without even looking at it.

If the explanation that an user group that has another use case than
you won't be enought then NAK it.

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPawy/AAoJEHZqAkdh1vT6cdAP/3CIpSE6k6BOPHXEri6hgLU4
> kfQhs6GKHRxgyCB63jDWJ1EShrErKUrCksWMAXO6p7tBniuMk8X5mJmQ4mBfHH9b
> 0yTu5bPFxB/zsK0lFqoOfWMOuwaJLZJQCuEQLJP4VvlVxexb5sZMbzMvudh+pGwQ
> DZEgDGbTF+hUrcxu0Rjxug9UXJa4nqfiCJ7ShKy3U2+ichZnr4tU9YfUl5ZGoofT
> W/xtJOBwEKogGB0KxIb2tphtChpoA8rPMy5WvRqlJ39lDsUOdOHUl5/Vu83Czpee
> ynFe5aRxYjsz0NUovuiBc5SUwVCwqJApR164FCFIkhHg7l1G7OJelSrn1+oqA62f
> fX6MTno5dYpaWImx2KiGqHOKqJF4wo+C0QqGNFBYde4Yu9Xu2Wdx/GQnycov6TOf
> deQtQnDHFZ4K4oaT4ptQvzcb0qN4KU5f3scCjSAR9SMNfPjjuaI7wmlRD8UwGB61
> s1oipV+SNE9icv8qSGbV9gw1Bo+B9w4AHRZllt9tdsDhnoMldBot7Fhc+FuW0MbH
> uFOmzi4R1j9lXmoh5pcFkmZKSYra4/UhU9DkwGZ4IZzEMCE4cxfwDc3MYGyPPOTE
> 0oMbq01pmAfPsio7gQ1bE73WC0JWBhKfbFJ7KxF3mH0oC1+mrBw9y2Al+7Zd0o7P
> B+y8ooG5B0ELZdWvczXO
> =EYSh
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Koen Kooi - March 22, 2012, 12:10 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Op 22-03-12 12:38, Samuel Stirtzel schreef:
> 2012/3/22 Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>: Op 22-03-12 11:12,
> Samuel Stirtzel schreef:
>>>> 2012/3/22 Eric Bénard <eric@eukrea.com>:
>>>>> Le Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:35:31 +0100, Samuel Stirtzel 
>>>>> <s.stirtzel@googlemail.com> a écrit :
>>>>>> 2012/3/22 Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>> why not add meta-oe dependency to meta-kde/README?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It is already listed as dependency [1]. But somehow it seems
>>>>>> like that there are users, interested in testing this layer,
>>>>>> with an use case which excludes the meta-oe layer.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> can you describe this use case so that meta-oe gets a chance to
>>>>> adapt.
>>>> 
>>>> Since I have the common use case of the installation provided from
>>>> the setup-scripts and I don't know the exact use case, I cannot
>>>> provide this information myself right now.
> 
> So you can't explain why it should move to oe-core, that should be enough
> to NAK this patch without even looking at it.
> 
>> If the explanation that an user group that has another use case

No, an *alledged* user group that *might* have an *alledged* use case for
which you say yourself you cannot provide the information. That is what I'm
complaining about, the degrees of hearsay and hypotheticals in your argument.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPaxajAAoJEHZqAkdh1vT6+PgP/13/oayQIuLVdpEx2uslB0LZ
XV5ctwGBoPW6VCIXg/GpTe0BzdIe8hUdnCLZt0gLf2UMN44Wy3RNVZ86000s0GM3
R1/cJ+qNCjrjvNQtUYazG5fklvOk1MtHQnhvyznmkhrSYdaPsMQeeZHkdGey35X6
MZavWe0ufOdKwJG7xgRb5LETduk8IgK6l7sYXr8lIvqq+TRzOqwkDO8ny1cQz1O6
yKFPDisAQGsn4IKwwxPnpoS9/78y8HK4oo6jq5KWoLkQHIGmqe224mTTv7F+EV0b
Ph/TwCQO6oNFLj64oaW9lQpBO1sSTBAMj51Oxvs8cHdQsZeswiAYH9qm8rbrNlRy
QM0QRPxx6aB1K242ZcQfAlMXjgiw0akiMxtxMknJJTzVIpXINV+ZLn2TxsRVHRh+
buuL7HCOiwGYXXzheXLaX4fS+Ctf4i6y0oI8o1F3vscAcj5z7n0YCEG0xu4wWddd
bVbKQ/NHAnkdEE2PKYoP3jJirzFAfh/1X2NCWgD0CJSYoNkukZ3Tx1reINHg4mW5
r3pFkaxo3B/5QaEHgo6Q8w/bGHu6toOjc3xt7yZPVp1Ita8yRxFEulrBcecd+UbO
zzorKmBkJ96y98C6q2ihbo+SqrCGn/5Sx1b/8y7r70DWXyuECasdWM+5ASBmiiJs
TAl4oHGfVVoedxmuD7fJ
=AxKX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Samuel Stirtzel - March 22, 2012, 12:36 p.m.
2012/3/22 Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Op 22-03-12 12:38, Samuel Stirtzel schreef:
>> 2012/3/22 Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>: Op 22-03-12 11:12,
>> Samuel Stirtzel schreef:
>>>>> 2012/3/22 Eric Bénard <eric@eukrea.com>:
>>>>>> Le Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:35:31 +0100, Samuel Stirtzel
>>>>>> <s.stirtzel@googlemail.com> a écrit :
>>>>>>> 2012/3/22 Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>> why not add meta-oe dependency to meta-kde/README?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is already listed as dependency [1]. But somehow it seems
>>>>>>> like that there are users, interested in testing this layer,
>>>>>>> with an use case which excludes the meta-oe layer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> can you describe this use case so that meta-oe gets a chance to
>>>>>> adapt.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since I have the common use case of the installation provided from
>>>>> the setup-scripts and I don't know the exact use case, I cannot
>>>>> provide this information myself right now.
>>
>> So you can't explain why it should move to oe-core, that should be enough
>> to NAK this patch without even looking at it.
>>
>>> If the explanation that an user group that has another use case
>
> No, an *alledged* user group that *might* have an *alledged* use case for
> which you say yourself you cannot provide the information. That is what I'm
> complaining about, the degrees of hearsay and hypotheticals in your argument.

Ok I will send a V2 with a proper commit message and a proper target
audience / use case.

>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPaxajAAoJEHZqAkdh1vT6+PgP/13/oayQIuLVdpEx2uslB0LZ
> XV5ctwGBoPW6VCIXg/GpTe0BzdIe8hUdnCLZt0gLf2UMN44Wy3RNVZ86000s0GM3
> R1/cJ+qNCjrjvNQtUYazG5fklvOk1MtHQnhvyznmkhrSYdaPsMQeeZHkdGey35X6
> MZavWe0ufOdKwJG7xgRb5LETduk8IgK6l7sYXr8lIvqq+TRzOqwkDO8ny1cQz1O6
> yKFPDisAQGsn4IKwwxPnpoS9/78y8HK4oo6jq5KWoLkQHIGmqe224mTTv7F+EV0b
> Ph/TwCQO6oNFLj64oaW9lQpBO1sSTBAMj51Oxvs8cHdQsZeswiAYH9qm8rbrNlRy
> QM0QRPxx6aB1K242ZcQfAlMXjgiw0akiMxtxMknJJTzVIpXINV+ZLn2TxsRVHRh+
> buuL7HCOiwGYXXzheXLaX4fS+Ctf4i6y0oI8o1F3vscAcj5z7n0YCEG0xu4wWddd
> bVbKQ/NHAnkdEE2PKYoP3jJirzFAfh/1X2NCWgD0CJSYoNkukZ3Tx1reINHg4mW5
> r3pFkaxo3B/5QaEHgo6Q8w/bGHu6toOjc3xt7yZPVp1Ita8yRxFEulrBcecd+UbO
> zzorKmBkJ96y98C6q2ihbo+SqrCGn/5Sx1b/8y7r70DWXyuECasdWM+5ASBmiiJs
> TAl4oHGfVVoedxmuD7fJ
> =AxKX
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Khem Raj - March 22, 2012, 4:04 p.m.
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 2:42 AM, Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
>
> In the mean time I bet Khem would love to have people sending patches to
> move the toolchain bits to a meta-toolchain layer inside the
> meta-openembedded repo.

yes please.

Patch

diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/giflib/giflib_4.1.6.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/giflib/giflib_4.1.6.bb
deleted file mode 100644
index bd7b495..0000000
--- a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/giflib/giflib_4.1.6.bb
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@ 
-DESCRIPTION = "shared library for GIF images"
-SECTION = "libs"
-LICENSE = "MIT"
-LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=ae11c61b04b2917be39b11f78d71519a"
-PR = "r2"
-
-SRC_URI = "${SOURCEFORGE_MIRROR}/giflib/${BP}.tar.bz2"
-
-inherit autotools
-
-DEPENDS = "libsm"
-
-PACKAGES += "${PN}-utils"
-FILES_${PN} = "${libdir}/libgif.so.*"
-FILES_${PN}-utils = "${bindir}"
-
-BBCLASSEXTEND = "native"
-
-SRC_URI[md5sum] = "7125644155ae6ad33dbc9fc15a14735f"
-SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "e1c1ced9c5bc8f93ef0faf0a8c7717abf784d10a7b270d2285e8e1f3b93f2bed"