| Submitter | Richard Purdie |
|---|---|
| Date | Feb. 23, 2012, 1:38 p.m. |
| Message ID | <32a9dc576917167f6c2392c822abf54fba58eaf2.1330004039.git.richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> |
| Download | mbox | patch |
| Permalink | /patch/21739/ |
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | 019747e5fe834092731cdb2987d9c6e1f7fd1cc1 |
| Headers | show |
Comments
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:38, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > WARNING: For recipe libusb-compat, the following files/directories were installed but not shipped in any package: > WARNING: /lib/libusb.la Why not drop it?
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 12:53 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:38, Richard Purdie > <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > WARNING: For recipe libusb-compat, the following files/directories were installed but not shipped in any package: > > WARNING: /lib/libusb.la > > Why not drop it? I want to be consistent. We currently package the .la files. We've also recently witnessed what can happen when they're removed... Cheers, Richard
Patch
diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libusb/libusb-compat_0.1.3.bb b/meta/recipes-support/libusb/libusb-compat_0.1.3.bb index 1595a29..43da5af 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-support/libusb/libusb-compat_0.1.3.bb +++ b/meta/recipes-support/libusb/libusb-compat_0.1.3.bb @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ DEPENDS = "libusb1" PROVIDES = "libusb" PE = "1" -PR = "r3" +PR = "r4" SRC_URI = "${SOURCEFORGE_MIRROR}/libusb/libusb-compat-${PV}.tar.bz2 \ file://0.1.0-beta1-gcc3.4-fix.patch" @@ -34,4 +34,4 @@ do_install_append() { fi } -FILES_${PN}-dev += "${base_libdir}/*.so" +FILES_${PN}-dev += "${base_libdir}/*.so ${base_libdir}/*.la"
WARNING: For recipe libusb-compat, the following files/directories were installed but not shipped in any package: WARNING: /lib/libusb.la Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> --- meta/recipes-support/libusb/libusb-compat_0.1.3.bb | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)