Patchwork [7/8] linux-libc-headers: new recipes for latest upstream 3.2.2

From: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>
---
 .../linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.2.2.bb |    7 +++++++
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_3.2.2.bb

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:55 PM,  <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com> wrote:
> +SRC_URI += " file://connector-msg-size-fix.patch"

I happen to peek into this patch. It seems this patch should not be applied
since its specific to a wrs kernel and linux-yocto does not apply this patch
as well.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
> Khem Raj
> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 2:14 PM
> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 7/8] linux-libc-headers: new recipes for
> latest upstream 3.2.2
> 
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:55 PM,  <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com> wrote:
> > +SRC_URI += " file://connector-msg-size-fix.patch"
> 
> I happen to peek into this patch. It seems this patch should not be
> applied
> since its specific to a wrs kernel and linux-yocto does not apply this
> patch
> as well.
> 

This commit can also be kept out for now.

Nitin


> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:55 PM,  <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com> wrote:
>> +SRC_URI += " file://connector-msg-size-fix.patch"
>
> I happen to peek into this patch. It seems this patch should not be applied
> since its specific to a wrs kernel and linux-yocto does not apply this patch
> as well.

The latter is true (this isn't applied to linux-yocto), but the former
isn't quite true.
It was required in 2.6.34, where we used the Wind River kernel
directly. It wasn't
specific to the Wind River kernel, it was associated with the kernel version.

Cheers,

Bruce

>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:55 PM,  <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com> wrote:
>>> +SRC_URI += " file://connector-msg-size-fix.patch"
>>
>> I happen to peek into this patch. It seems this patch should not be applied
>> since its specific to a wrs kernel and linux-yocto does not apply this patch
>> as well.
>
> The latter is true (this isn't applied to linux-yocto), but the former
> isn't quite true.
> It was required in 2.6.34, where we used the Wind River kernel
> directly. It wasn't
> specific to the Wind River kernel, it was associated with the kernel version.
>

in nutshell it can be dropped now. Right  ?

> Cheers,
>
> Bruce
>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
>
>
> --
> "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
> thee at its end"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:55 PM,  <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com> wrote:
>>>> +SRC_URI += " file://connector-msg-size-fix.patch"
>>>
>>> I happen to peek into this patch. It seems this patch should not be applied
>>> since its specific to a wrs kernel and linux-yocto does not apply this patch
>>> as well.
>>
>> The latter is true (this isn't applied to linux-yocto), but the former
>> isn't quite true.
>> It was required in 2.6.34, where we used the Wind River kernel
>> directly. It wasn't
>> specific to the Wind River kernel, it was associated with the kernel version.
>>
>
> in nutshell it can be dropped now. Right  ?

There's no longer any 2.6.34 and no mismatch to fix up .. so from everything I
know about this patch, it can go now.

Bruce

>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Bruce
>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
>> thee at its end"
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core