| Submitter | Saul Wold |
|---|---|
| Date | Jan. 11, 2012, 7:36 a.m. |
| Message ID | <cover.1326267271.git.sgw@linux.intel.com> |
| Download | mbox |
| Permalink | /patch/19045/ |
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
Pull-request
git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib sgw/stageComments
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 23:36 -0800, Saul Wold wrote: > Richard, > > Here are the final items we discussed yesterday, a succesful > build finished, and we seem to be in good shape, please pull > these early in your day and fire up AB Master is you can. > > > Thanks > Sau! > > > The following changes since commit 9b944ae2f0e4dbac5a8f1f235f60730e56b26516: > > Revert "site/common-uclibc: Cache gl_cv_func_wcwidth_works" (2012-01-10 18:32:16 +0000) > > are available in the git repository at: > git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib sgw/stage > http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=sgw/stage > > Lianhao Lu (2): > meta/PRService: Added export/import fuctions. > package.bbclass: per recipe PRSERV_HOST support > > Robert Yang (2): > Incremental rpm image generation > Incremental rpm image generation(Add config sample) I merged these, thanks. > Shane Wang (1): > hdparm: upgrade to 9.37 This one needs to be split up as Paul points out... Cheers, Richard
On 01/11/2012 02:40 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 23:36 -0800, Saul Wold wrote: >> Richard, >> >> Here are the final items we discussed yesterday, a succesful >> build finished, and we seem to be in good shape, please pull >> these early in your day and fire up AB Master is you can. >> >> >> Thanks >> Sau! >> >> >> The following changes since commit 9b944ae2f0e4dbac5a8f1f235f60730e56b26516: >> >> Revert "site/common-uclibc: Cache gl_cv_func_wcwidth_works" (2012-01-10 18:32:16 +0000) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib sgw/stage >> http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=sgw/stage >> >> Lianhao Lu (2): >> meta/PRService: Added export/import fuctions. >> package.bbclass: per recipe PRSERV_HOST support >> >> Robert Yang (2): >> Incremental rpm image generation >> Incremental rpm image generation(Add config sample) > > I merged these, thanks. > >> Shane Wang (1): >> hdparm: upgrade to 9.37 > > This one needs to be split up as Paul points out... > Ok, but one question about bisect-ability, if they are split and the hdparm is in one side of a bisect without the new stat package, doesn't that break the bisect ability "rule"? Sau! > Cheers, > > Richard > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >
Op 11 jan. 2012, om 17:45 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven: > On 01/11/2012 02:40 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: >> On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 23:36 -0800, Saul Wold wrote: >>> Richard, >>> >>> Here are the final items we discussed yesterday, a succesful >>> build finished, and we seem to be in good shape, please pull >>> these early in your day and fire up AB Master is you can. >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> Sau! >>> >>> >>> The following changes since commit 9b944ae2f0e4dbac5a8f1f235f60730e56b26516: >>> >>> Revert "site/common-uclibc: Cache gl_cv_func_wcwidth_works" (2012-01-10 18:32:16 +0000) >>> >>> are available in the git repository at: >>> git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib sgw/stage >>> http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=sgw/stage >>> >>> Lianhao Lu (2): >>> meta/PRService: Added export/import fuctions. >>> package.bbclass: per recipe PRSERV_HOST support >>> >>> Robert Yang (2): >>> Incremental rpm image generation >>> Incremental rpm image generation(Add config sample) >> >> I merged these, thanks. >> >>> Shane Wang (1): >>> hdparm: upgrade to 9.37 >> >> This one needs to be split up as Paul points out... >> > Ok, but one question about bisect-ability, if they are split and the hdparm is in one side of a bisect without the new stat package, doesn't that break the bisect ability "rule"? That's why you add the stat recipe first.