| Submitter | Andreas Müller |
|---|---|
| Date | Jan. 8, 2012, 1:33 a.m. |
| Message ID | <1325986434-2020-1-git-send-email-schnitzeltony@gmx.de> |
| Download | mbox | patch |
| Permalink | /patch/18761/ |
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Comments
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Op 08-01-12 02:33, Andreas Müller schreef: > If systemd was not yet build, udisks configure caused systemd files not > being build so udisks-sytemd package was empty. On do_rootfs we got: | > Collected errors: | * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package > udisks-systemd. > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@gmx.de> I'm not sure this is the right solution, but I'll take the patch if someone doesn't come up with a better way to solve this. regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAk8KtX0ACgkQMkyGM64RGpEdiQCdHJrxZ2qeZVKMPhnOBIZIge+4 jXkAnj+eSR0cBM8Rs/GQSmFdVLFGRKsz =UdTQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 07:38, Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote: > I'm not sure this is the right solution, but I'll take the patch if someone > doesn't come up with a better way to solve this. > The right fix is to handle it in systemd.bbclass and bump every package PR using it.
On Monday, January 09, 2012 12:29:47 PM Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 07:38, Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote: > > I'm not sure this is the right solution, but I'll take the patch if > > someone doesn't come up with a better way to solve this. > > The right fix is to handle it in systemd.bbclass and bump every package PR > using it. Can we agree on that? I would volunteer to prepare these patches. Andreas
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@gmx.de> wrote: > On Monday, January 09, 2012 12:29:47 PM Otavio Salvador wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 07:38, Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote: >> > I'm not sure this is the right solution, but I'll take the patch if >> > someone doesn't come up with a better way to solve this. Seems this patch is also necessary for building from the current master. >> The right fix is to handle it in systemd.bbclass and bump every package PR >> using it. > Can we agree on that? I would volunteer to prepare these patches. Is this still the plan? Peter
Patch
diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-support/udisks/udisks_1.0.4.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-support/udisks/udisks_1.0.4.bb index c3e2664..0e330fa 100644 --- a/meta-oe/recipes-support/udisks/udisks_1.0.4.bb +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-support/udisks/udisks_1.0.4.bb @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ DESCRIPTION = "A storage daemon that implements well-defined D-Bus interfaces th LICENSE = "GPLv2+" LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=73d83aebe7e4b62346afde80e0e94273" -DEPENDS = "libatasmart sg3-utils polkit udev dbus-glib glib-2.0" +DEPENDS = "libatasmart sg3-utils polkit udev dbus-glib glib-2.0 systemd" # optional dependencies: device-mapper parted SRC_URI = "http://hal.freedesktop.org/releases/${BPN}-${PV}.tar.gz;name=${BPN} \ @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ SRC_URI = "http://hal.freedesktop.org/releases/${BPN}-${PV}.tar.gz;name=${BPN} \ SRC_URI[udisks.md5sum] = "86c63b2b5484f2060499a052b5b6256b" SRC_URI[udisks.sha256sum] = "854b89368733b9c3a577101b761ad5397ae75a05110c8698ac5b29de9a8bf8f5" -PR = "r1" +PR = "r2" inherit autotools systemd
If systemd was not yet build, udisks configure caused systemd files not being build so udisks-sytemd package was empty. On do_rootfs we got: | Collected errors: | * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package udisks-systemd. Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@gmx.de> --- meta-oe/recipes-support/udisks/udisks_1.0.4.bb | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)