| Message ID | cover.1674597466.git.bruce.ashfield@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 16:59 -0500, bruce.ashfield@gmail.com wrote: > From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com> > > Richard, > > As promised, here are the commits to switch us over to 6.1 as the > default. > > I'll also send a series for poky to bump things there as well. > > Also, if there are any significant problems, we'll just shelve this > while I look at any issues. But at this point, it is worth getting > the patches out there to move the needle to 6.1 Thanks! I think the issues are: a) two selftest failures: oe-selftest -r devtool.DevtoolUpgradeTests.test_devtool_virtual_kernel_modify oe-selftest -r efibootpartition.GenericEFITest.test_boot_efi b) meta-arm issues c) meta-virt issue (which you have a patch pending for in -next) I suspect we can switch poky-tiny and defer the removal patches for a few days to give meta-arm time to sort itself out. The only question then becomes the selftest issues. I'm taking a quick look to see if they're simple to sort. Cheers, Richard
On 26/01/2023 12:39:02+0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 16:59 -0500, bruce.ashfield@gmail.com wrote: > > From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com> > > > > Richard, > > > > As promised, here are the commits to switch us over to 6.1 as the > > default. > > > > I'll also send a series for poky to bump things there as well. > > > > Also, if there are any significant problems, we'll just shelve this > > while I look at any issues. But at this point, it is worth getting > > the patches out there to move the needle to 6.1 > > Thanks! > > I think the issues are: > > a) two selftest failures: > > oe-selftest -r devtool.DevtoolUpgradeTests.test_devtool_virtual_kernel_modify > oe-selftest -r efibootpartition.GenericEFITest.test_boot_efi > > b) meta-arm issues > > c) meta-virt issue (which you have a patch pending for in -next) > Unfortunately, I have to add d) perf reproducibility issues: https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/117/builds/2294/steps/13/logs/stdio > I suspect we can switch poky-tiny and defer the removal patches for a > few days to give meta-arm time to sort itself out. The only question > then becomes the selftest issues. I'm taking a quick look to see if > they're simple to sort. > > Cheers, > > Richard > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. > View/Reply Online (#176392): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/176392 > Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/96508797/3617179 > Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com] > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >
On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 17:21 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 26/01/2023 12:39:02+0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 16:59 -0500, bruce.ashfield@gmail.com wrote: > > > From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com> > > > > > > Richard, > > > > > > As promised, here are the commits to switch us over to 6.1 as the > > > default. > > > > > > I'll also send a series for poky to bump things there as well. > > > > > > Also, if there are any significant problems, we'll just shelve this > > > while I look at any issues. But at this point, it is worth getting > > > the patches out there to move the needle to 6.1 > > > > Thanks! > > > > I think the issues are: > > > > a) two selftest failures: > > > > oe-selftest -r devtool.DevtoolUpgradeTests.test_devtool_virtual_kernel_modify > > oe-selftest -r efibootpartition.GenericEFITest.test_boot_efi > > > > b) meta-arm issues > > > > c) meta-virt issue (which you have a patch pending for in -next) > > > > Unfortunately, I have to add > > d) perf reproducibility issues: > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/117/builds/2294/steps/13/logs/stdio Ahrrg. http://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/repro-fail/oe-reproducible-20230126-poma_o8v/packages/diff-html/ /lib/modules/6.1.5-yocto-standard/build/include/generated/compile.h from #define·LINUX_COMPILE_HOST» "alma8-ty-2.yocto.io to #define·LINUX_COMPILE_HOST» "ubuntu2004-ty-1" Bruce: Any idea if we can set that to some specific value? We probably should start by fixing that and then see if that improves things... Cheers, Richard
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 11:36 AM Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 17:21 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > On 26/01/2023 12:39:02+0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 16:59 -0500, bruce.ashfield@gmail.com wrote: > > > > From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > Richard, > > > > > > > > As promised, here are the commits to switch us over to 6.1 as the > > > > default. > > > > > > > > I'll also send a series for poky to bump things there as well. > > > > > > > > Also, if there are any significant problems, we'll just shelve this > > > > while I look at any issues. But at this point, it is worth getting > > > > the patches out there to move the needle to 6.1 > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > I think the issues are: > > > > > > a) two selftest failures: > > > > > > oe-selftest -r devtool.DevtoolUpgradeTests.test_devtool_virtual_kernel_modify > > > oe-selftest -r efibootpartition.GenericEFITest.test_boot_efi > > > > > > b) meta-arm issues > > > > > > c) meta-virt issue (which you have a patch pending for in -next) > > > > > > > Unfortunately, I have to add > > > > d) perf reproducibility issues: > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/117/builds/2294/steps/13/logs/stdio > > Ahrrg. > > http://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/repro-fail/oe-reproducible-20230126-poma_o8v/packages/diff-html/ > > > /lib/modules/6.1.5-yocto-standard/build/include/generated/compile.h > > from > > #define·LINUX_COMPILE_HOST» "alma8-ty-2.yocto.io > > to > > #define·LINUX_COMPILE_HOST» "ubuntu2004-ty-1" > > Bruce: Any idea if we can set that to some specific value? > My perf build just finished and I was just starting to poke into it. I'll have a look now. Let me know if you come up with anything in the meantime, I'll do the same. At the worst, I imagine we can sed the value to something consistent. Bruce > We probably should start by fixing that and then see if that improves > things... > > Cheers, > > Richard > > > >
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 11:36 AM Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 17:21 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > On 26/01/2023 12:39:02+0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 16:59 -0500, bruce.ashfield@gmail.com wrote: > > > > From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > Richard, > > > > > > > > As promised, here are the commits to switch us over to 6.1 as the > > > > default. > > > > > > > > I'll also send a series for poky to bump things there as well. > > > > > > > > Also, if there are any significant problems, we'll just shelve this > > > > while I look at any issues. But at this point, it is worth getting > > > > the patches out there to move the needle to 6.1 > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > I think the issues are: > > > > > > a) two selftest failures: > > > > > > oe-selftest -r devtool.DevtoolUpgradeTests.test_devtool_virtual_kernel_modify > > > oe-selftest -r efibootpartition.GenericEFITest.test_boot_efi > > > > > > b) meta-arm issues > > > > > > c) meta-virt issue (which you have a patch pending for in -next) > > > > > > > Unfortunately, I have to add > > > > d) perf reproducibility issues: > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/117/builds/2294/steps/13/logs/stdio > > Ahrrg. > > http://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/repro-fail/oe-reproducible-20230126-poma_o8v/packages/diff-html/ > > > /lib/modules/6.1.5-yocto-standard/build/include/generated/compile.h > > from > > #define·LINUX_COMPILE_HOST» "alma8-ty-2.yocto.io > > to > > #define·LINUX_COMPILE_HOST» "ubuntu2004-ty-1" > > Bruce: Any idea if we can set that to some specific value? > > We probably should start by fixing that and then see if that improves > things... Interesting. In my local builds: #define LINUX_COMPILE_HOST "oe-host" I'm building 6.1.7, but that shouldn't be the difference. The value comes from: classes-recipe/kernel.bbclass:export KBUILD_BUILD_HOST ?= "oe-host", and has been that way for a while. I'm also grepping for other BUILDPATHS references, but the QA test should have caught those if that was the issue. Bruce > > Cheers, > > Richard > > > >
On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 12:07 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 11:36 AM Richard Purdie > <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 17:21 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > > On 26/01/2023 12:39:02+0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 16:59 -0500, bruce.ashfield@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > Richard, > > > > > > > > > > As promised, here are the commits to switch us over to 6.1 as the > > > > > default. > > > > > > > > > > I'll also send a series for poky to bump things there as well. > > > > > > > > > > Also, if there are any significant problems, we'll just shelve this > > > > > while I look at any issues. But at this point, it is worth getting > > > > > the patches out there to move the needle to 6.1 > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > I think the issues are: > > > > > > > > a) two selftest failures: > > > > > > > > oe-selftest -r devtool.DevtoolUpgradeTests.test_devtool_virtual_kernel_modify > > > > oe-selftest -r efibootpartition.GenericEFITest.test_boot_efi > > > > > > > > b) meta-arm issues > > > > > > > > c) meta-virt issue (which you have a patch pending for in -next) > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, I have to add > > > > > > d) perf reproducibility issues: > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/117/builds/2294/steps/13/logs/stdio > > > > Ahrrg. > > > > http://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/repro-fail/oe-reproducible-20230126-poma_o8v/packages/diff-html/ > > > > > > /lib/modules/6.1.5-yocto-standard/build/include/generated/compile.h > > > > from > > > > #define·LINUX_COMPILE_HOST» "alma8-ty-2.yocto.io > > > > to > > > > #define·LINUX_COMPILE_HOST» "ubuntu2004-ty-1" > > > > Bruce: Any idea if we can set that to some specific value? > > > > We probably should start by fixing that and then see if that improves > > things... > > Interesting. In my local builds: > > #define LINUX_COMPILE_HOST "oe-host" > > I'm building 6.1.7, but that shouldn't be the difference. > > The value comes from: classes-recipe/kernel.bbclass:export > KBUILD_BUILD_HOST ?= "oe-host", > and has been that way for a while. > > I'm also grepping for other BUILDPATHS references, but the QA test > should have caught > those if that was the issue. I just realised that there are two issues, one is perf, the other is kernel-devsrc. The compile.h issue is in kernel-devsrc and that did reproduce for my locally just now. I'm not sure what is wrong with perf... Cheers, Richard
we need to define KBUILD_BUILD_USER="yocto" KBUILD_BUILD_HOST="yocto" in linux-yocto defconfigs You can use my name too :) On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 9:34 AM Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 12:07 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 11:36 AM Richard Purdie > > <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 17:21 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > > > On 26/01/2023 12:39:02+0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 16:59 -0500, bruce.ashfield@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > Richard, > > > > > > > > > > > > As promised, here are the commits to switch us over to 6.1 as the > > > > > > default. > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll also send a series for poky to bump things there as well. > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, if there are any significant problems, we'll just shelve this > > > > > > while I look at any issues. But at this point, it is worth getting > > > > > > the patches out there to move the needle to 6.1 > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > I think the issues are: > > > > > > > > > > a) two selftest failures: > > > > > > > > > > oe-selftest -r devtool.DevtoolUpgradeTests.test_devtool_virtual_kernel_modify > > > > > oe-selftest -r efibootpartition.GenericEFITest.test_boot_efi > > > > > > > > > > b) meta-arm issues > > > > > > > > > > c) meta-virt issue (which you have a patch pending for in -next) > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, I have to add > > > > > > > > d) perf reproducibility issues: > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/117/builds/2294/steps/13/logs/stdio > > > > > > Ahrrg. > > > > > > http://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/repro-fail/oe-reproducible-20230126-poma_o8v/packages/diff-html/ > > > > > > > > > /lib/modules/6.1.5-yocto-standard/build/include/generated/compile.h > > > > > > from > > > > > > #define·LINUX_COMPILE_HOST» "alma8-ty-2.yocto.io > > > > > > to > > > > > > #define·LINUX_COMPILE_HOST» "ubuntu2004-ty-1" > > > > > > Bruce: Any idea if we can set that to some specific value? > > > > > > We probably should start by fixing that and then see if that improves > > > things... > > > > Interesting. In my local builds: > > > > #define LINUX_COMPILE_HOST "oe-host" > > > > I'm building 6.1.7, but that shouldn't be the difference. > > > > The value comes from: classes-recipe/kernel.bbclass:export > > KBUILD_BUILD_HOST ?= "oe-host", > > and has been that way for a while. > > > > I'm also grepping for other BUILDPATHS references, but the QA test > > should have caught > > those if that was the issue. > > > I just realised that there are two issues, one is perf, the other is > kernel-devsrc. The compile.h issue is in kernel-devsrc and that did > reproduce for my locally just now. I'm not sure what is wrong with > perf... > > Cheers, > > Richard > > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. > View/Reply Online (#176414): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/176414 > Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/96508797/1997914 > Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [raj.khem@gmail.com] > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 12:58 PM Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: > > we need to define > > KBUILD_BUILD_USER="yocto" > KBUILD_BUILD_HOST="yocto" > > in linux-yocto defconfigs > No, we really don't want to do that. There's an environment variable that is supposed to be reflected in the build. Which we already set. If that has changed in 6.1, then I'll come up with a patch as required. Bruce > You can use my name too :) > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 9:34 AM Richard Purdie > <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 12:07 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 11:36 AM Richard Purdie > > > <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 17:21 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > > > > On 26/01/2023 12:39:02+0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 16:59 -0500, bruce.ashfield@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > > From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Richard, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As promised, here are the commits to switch us over to 6.1 as the > > > > > > > default. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll also send a series for poky to bump things there as well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, if there are any significant problems, we'll just shelve this > > > > > > > while I look at any issues. But at this point, it is worth getting > > > > > > > the patches out there to move the needle to 6.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > I think the issues are: > > > > > > > > > > > > a) two selftest failures: > > > > > > > > > > > > oe-selftest -r devtool.DevtoolUpgradeTests.test_devtool_virtual_kernel_modify > > > > > > oe-selftest -r efibootpartition.GenericEFITest.test_boot_efi > > > > > > > > > > > > b) meta-arm issues > > > > > > > > > > > > c) meta-virt issue (which you have a patch pending for in -next) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, I have to add > > > > > > > > > > d) perf reproducibility issues: > > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/117/builds/2294/steps/13/logs/stdio > > > > > > > > Ahrrg. > > > > > > > > http://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/repro-fail/oe-reproducible-20230126-poma_o8v/packages/diff-html/ > > > > > > > > > > > > /lib/modules/6.1.5-yocto-standard/build/include/generated/compile.h > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > #define·LINUX_COMPILE_HOST» "alma8-ty-2.yocto.io > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > #define·LINUX_COMPILE_HOST» "ubuntu2004-ty-1" > > > > > > > > Bruce: Any idea if we can set that to some specific value? > > > > > > > > We probably should start by fixing that and then see if that improves > > > > things... > > > > > > Interesting. In my local builds: > > > > > > #define LINUX_COMPILE_HOST "oe-host" > > > > > > I'm building 6.1.7, but that shouldn't be the difference. > > > > > > The value comes from: classes-recipe/kernel.bbclass:export > > > KBUILD_BUILD_HOST ?= "oe-host", > > > and has been that way for a while. > > > > > > I'm also grepping for other BUILDPATHS references, but the QA test > > > should have caught > > > those if that was the issue. > > > > > > I just realised that there are two issues, one is perf, the other is > > kernel-devsrc. The compile.h issue is in kernel-devsrc and that did > > reproduce for my locally just now. I'm not sure what is wrong with > > perf... > > > > Cheers, > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. > > View/Reply Online (#176414): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/176414 > > Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/96508797/1997914 > > Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [raj.khem@gmail.com] > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > >
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 10:06 AM Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 12:58 PM Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > we need to define > > > > KBUILD_BUILD_USER="yocto" > > KBUILD_BUILD_HOST="yocto" > > > > in linux-yocto defconfigs > > > > No, we really don't want to do that. > > There's an environment variable that is supposed to be reflected in > the build. Which we already set. a better location would be distro config defining it and derived distros can override it if needed. > > If that has changed in 6.1, then I'll come up with a patch as required. > > Bruce > > > You can use my name too :) > > > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 9:34 AM Richard Purdie > > <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 12:07 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 11:36 AM Richard Purdie > > > > <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 17:21 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > > > > > On 26/01/2023 12:39:02+0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 16:59 -0500, bruce.ashfield@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Richard, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As promised, here are the commits to switch us over to 6.1 as the > > > > > > > > default. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll also send a series for poky to bump things there as well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, if there are any significant problems, we'll just shelve this > > > > > > > > while I look at any issues. But at this point, it is worth getting > > > > > > > > the patches out there to move the needle to 6.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think the issues are: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a) two selftest failures: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > oe-selftest -r devtool.DevtoolUpgradeTests.test_devtool_virtual_kernel_modify > > > > > > > oe-selftest -r efibootpartition.GenericEFITest.test_boot_efi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > b) meta-arm issues > > > > > > > > > > > > > > c) meta-virt issue (which you have a patch pending for in -next) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, I have to add > > > > > > > > > > > > d) perf reproducibility issues: > > > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/117/builds/2294/steps/13/logs/stdio > > > > > > > > > > Ahrrg. > > > > > > > > > > http://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/repro-fail/oe-reproducible-20230126-poma_o8v/packages/diff-html/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /lib/modules/6.1.5-yocto-standard/build/include/generated/compile.h > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > #define·LINUX_COMPILE_HOST» "alma8-ty-2.yocto.io > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > #define·LINUX_COMPILE_HOST» "ubuntu2004-ty-1" > > > > > > > > > > Bruce: Any idea if we can set that to some specific value? > > > > > > > > > > We probably should start by fixing that and then see if that improves > > > > > things... > > > > > > > > Interesting. In my local builds: > > > > > > > > #define LINUX_COMPILE_HOST "oe-host" > > > > > > > > I'm building 6.1.7, but that shouldn't be the difference. > > > > > > > > The value comes from: classes-recipe/kernel.bbclass:export > > > > KBUILD_BUILD_HOST ?= "oe-host", > > > > and has been that way for a while. > > > > > > > > I'm also grepping for other BUILDPATHS references, but the QA test > > > > should have caught > > > > those if that was the issue. > > > > > > > > > I just realised that there are two issues, one is perf, the other is > > > kernel-devsrc. The compile.h issue is in kernel-devsrc and that did > > > reproduce for my locally just now. I'm not sure what is wrong with > > > perf... > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > > Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. > > > View/Reply Online (#176414): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/176414 > > > Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/96508797/1997914 > > > Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org > > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [raj.khem@gmail.com] > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > > > > > > -- > - Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await > thee at its end > - "Use the force Harry" - Gandalf, Star Trek II
From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com> Richard, As promised, here are the commits to switch us over to 6.1 as the default. I'll also send a series for poky to bump things there as well. Also, if there are any significant problems, we'll just shelve this while I look at any issues. But at this point, it is worth getting the patches out there to move the needle to 6.1 Bruce The following changes since commit 3c3fd6a65e8103f74ae382d196d486b31a168b39: insane: Improve patch warning/error handling (2023-01-21 07:46:38 +0000) are available in the Git repository at: https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib zedd/kernel http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=zedd/kernel Bruce Ashfield (2): linux-yocto/5.19: drop recipes conf/qemu: bump preferred kernel version to 6.1 meta/conf/machine/include/x86/x86-base.inc | 2 +- meta/conf/machine/qemuarmv5.conf | 2 +- .../linux/linux-yocto-rt_5.19.bb | 45 ------------ .../linux/linux-yocto-tiny_5.19.bb | 30 -------- meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_5.19.bb | 70 ------------------- 5 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 147 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-rt_5.19.bb delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-tiny_5.19.bb delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_5.19.bb