Patchwork eeze: update to 1.0.1

login
mail settings
Submitter Philippe De Swert
Date March 28, 2011, 9:45 p.m.
Message ID <1301348740-30018-1-git-send-email-philippedeswert@gmail.com>
Download mbox | patch
Permalink /patch/1841/
State Accepted
Headers show

Comments

Philippe De Swert - March 28, 2011, 9:45 p.m.
* Update to 1.0.1
* Contains bugfixes for udev watch/find functions to make sure devices are shown correctly

Signed-off-by: phdeswer <philippedeswert@gmail.com>
---
 recipes/efl1/eeze_1.0.1.bb |   10 ++++++++++
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 recipes/efl1/eeze_1.0.1.bb
Paul Menzel - March 28, 2011, 11:24 p.m.
Am Dienstag, den 29.03.2011, 00:45 +0300 schrieb phdeswer:
> * Update to 1.0.1

No need to recite the commit summary, in my opinion.

> * Contains bugfixes for udev watch/find functions to make sure devices are shown correctly

Since it looks like a minor update, maybe 1.0.0 should be replaced right
away.

> Signed-off-by: phdeswer <philippedeswert@gmail.com>

I think your full name is need here [1]. You can change your Git setup
using `git config user.name "Philippe Deswert"`.

> ---
>  recipes/efl1/eeze_1.0.1.bb |   10 ++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 recipes/efl1/eeze_1.0.1.bb
> 
> diff --git a/recipes/efl1/eeze_1.0.1.bb b/recipes/efl1/eeze_1.0.1.bb
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..cc1d721
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/recipes/efl1/eeze_1.0.1.bb
> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> +require eeze.inc
> +
> +PR = "${INC_PR}.0"
> +
> +SRC_URI = "\
> +  ${E_MIRROR}/${SRCNAME}-${PV}.tar.gz \
> +"
> +
> +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "e36b5e8ed444c8d13d27fd82d5f71659"
> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "736470383c33837edd88f417200c5612ca9cc5f400bc48d61fd966fec3fe09d7"


Thank you for your patch,

Paul


[1] http://openembedded.org/index.php/Commit_Policy
Philippe De Swert - March 29, 2011, 11:16 a.m.
Hi Paul,

On 29/03/2011, Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 29.03.2011, 00:45 +0300 schrieb phdeswer:
>> * Update to 1.0.1
>
> No need to recite the commit summary, in my opinion.

Well I kind of did because that were the changes and I wanted to make
sure the mail header was correct. Maybe I can skip it next time
indeed.

>> * Contains bugfixes for udev watch/find functions to make sure devices are
>> shown correctly
>
> Since it looks like a minor update, maybe 1.0.0 should be replaced right
> away.

Would be an option.

>> Signed-off-by: phdeswer <philippedeswert@gmail.com>
>
> I think your full name is need here [1]. You can change your Git setup
> using `git config user.name "Philippe Deswert"`.

I just followed the instructions here [1], but I updated my name as
suggested by you. So that should be fine for the next commits.

Thanks for the review!

Philippe

[1] http://www.openembedded.org/index.php/How_to_submit_a_patch_to_OpenEmbedded
Paul Menzel - March 29, 2011, 3:10 p.m.
Dear Martin,


Am Dienstag, den 29.03.2011, 14:16 +0300 schrieb Philippe De Swert:

> On 29/03/2011, Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 29.03.2011, 00:45 +0300 schrieb phdeswer:
> >> * Update to 1.0.1
> >
> > No need to recite the commit summary, in my opinion.
> 
> Well I kind of did because that were the changes and I wanted to make
> sure the mail header was correct. Maybe I can skip it next time
> indeed.
> 
> >> * Contains bugfixes for udev watch/find functions to make sure devices are
> >> shown correctly
> >
> > Since it looks like a minor update, maybe 1.0.0 should be replaced right
> > away.
> 
> Would be an option.
> 
> >> Signed-off-by: phdeswer <philippedeswert@gmail.com>
> >
> > I think your full name is need here [1]. You can change your Git setup
> > using `git config user.name "Philippe Deswert"`.
> 
> I just followed the instructions here [1], but I updated my name as
> suggested by you. So that should be fine for the next commits.

what do you prefer? Keep or remove Eeze 1.0.0?


Thanks,

Paul


> [1] http://www.openembedded.org/index.php/How_to_submit_a_patch_to_OpenEmbedded
Martin Jansa - March 29, 2011, 7:14 p.m.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 05:10:20PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Martin,
> what do you prefer? Keep or remove Eeze 1.0.0?

feel free to remove 1.0.0

Cheers,
Paul Menzel - March 30, 2011, 10:39 a.m.
Am Dienstag, den 29.03.2011, 21:14 +0200 schrieb Martin Jansa:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 05:10:20PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:

> > what do you prefer? Keep or remove Eeze 1.0.0?
> 
> feel free to remove 1.0.0

Thank you for your reply. I pushed commit fd3c59f7 [1].

Philippe, please update the state in the patch queue.


Thanks,

Paul


[1] http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?id=fd3c59f71032f3bbd94248fe225df1b1bbac3c2f

Patch

diff --git a/recipes/efl1/eeze_1.0.1.bb b/recipes/efl1/eeze_1.0.1.bb
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..cc1d721
--- /dev/null
+++ b/recipes/efl1/eeze_1.0.1.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ 
+require eeze.inc
+
+PR = "${INC_PR}.0"
+
+SRC_URI = "\
+  ${E_MIRROR}/${SRCNAME}-${PV}.tar.gz \
+"
+
+SRC_URI[md5sum] = "e36b5e8ed444c8d13d27fd82d5f71659"
+SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "736470383c33837edd88f417200c5612ca9cc5f400bc48d61fd966fec3fe09d7"