| Submitter | Adriano Pallavicino |
|---|---|
| Date | Dec. 31, 2011, 11:44 a.m. |
| Message ID | <1325331840-23575-1-git-send-email-adriano.pallavicino@gmail.com> |
| Download | mbox | patch |
| Permalink | /patch/17921/ |
| State | Not Applicable |
| Headers | show |
Comments
2011/12/31 Adriano Pallavicino <adrianopallavicino@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Adriano Pallavicino <adriano.pallavicino@gmail.com> > > Fixed md5sum and sha256sum > --- > recipes/binutils/binutils_2.20.1.bb | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/recipes/binutils/binutils_2.20.1.bb b/recipes/binutils/ > binutils_2.20.1.bb > index 5154e2d..f40b676 100644 > --- a/recipes/binutils/binutils_2.20.1.bb > +++ b/recipes/binutils/binutils_2.20.1.bb > @@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ SRC_URI_append_nios2 =" \ > file://binutils-nios2.patch \ > " > > -SRC_URI[tarball.sha256sum] = > "228b84722d87e88e7fdd36869e590e649ab523a0800a7d53df906498afe6f6f8" > -SRC_URI[tarball.md5sum] = "9cdfb9d6ec0578c166d3beae5e15c4e5" > +SRC_URI[tarball.sha256sum] = > "71d37c96451333c5c0b84b170169fdcb138bbb27397dc06281905d9717c8ed64" > +SRC_URI[tarball.md5sum] = "2b9dc8f2b7dbd5ec5992c6e29de0b764" > > # powerpc patches > SRC_URI += "\ > -- > 1.7.4.1 > As told on IRC, I'd suggest to compare against the version in master. THere the issue was fixed using this patch: http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded/commit/recipes/binutils/binutils_2.20.1.bb?id=262f9eb0f046cd77d041a9dcb055700c5ab6601b Note that this also patches SRC_URI. Guess the patch above should also go into master. Did you by any chance download your binutils tarball manually? Best regards, Frans
I can correctly download it from here ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils/binutils-2.20.1.tar.bz2 (as indicated inside bb file). The problem is only in sha256 and md5 sum. I'm using 2011.03-maintenance. I can desume that this branch is only for maintaining 2011.03 release. If someone decided to use binutils 2.20.1 why should I introduce the new 2.20.1a from master? All the things are tested with 2.20.1 and imho the branch 2011.03-maintenance must continue to utilize them. Of course, if maintainers consider this patch useless, I'll remove it from here. 2011/12/31 Frans Meulenbroeks <fransmeulenbroeks@gmail.com> > 2011/12/31 Adriano Pallavicino <adrianopallavicino@gmail.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Adriano Pallavicino <adriano.pallavicino@gmail.com> > > > > Fixed md5sum and sha256sum > > --- > > recipes/binutils/binutils_2.20.1.bb | 4 ++-- > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/recipes/binutils/binutils_2.20.1.bb b/recipes/binutils/ > > binutils_2.20.1.bb > > index 5154e2d..f40b676 100644 > > --- a/recipes/binutils/binutils_2.20.1.bb > > +++ b/recipes/binutils/binutils_2.20.1.bb > > @@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ SRC_URI_append_nios2 =" \ > > file://binutils-nios2.patch \ > > " > > > > -SRC_URI[tarball.sha256sum] = > > "228b84722d87e88e7fdd36869e590e649ab523a0800a7d53df906498afe6f6f8" > > -SRC_URI[tarball.md5sum] = "9cdfb9d6ec0578c166d3beae5e15c4e5" > > +SRC_URI[tarball.sha256sum] = > > "71d37c96451333c5c0b84b170169fdcb138bbb27397dc06281905d9717c8ed64" > > +SRC_URI[tarball.md5sum] = "2b9dc8f2b7dbd5ec5992c6e29de0b764" > > > > # powerpc patches > > SRC_URI += "\ > > -- > > 1.7.4.1 > > > > As told on IRC, I'd suggest to compare against the version in master. > THere the issue was fixed using this patch: > > http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded/commit/recipes/binutils/binutils_2.20.1.bb?id=262f9eb0f046cd77d041a9dcb055700c5ab6601b > > Note that this also patches SRC_URI. > Guess the patch above should also go into master. > > Did you by any chance download your binutils tarball manually? > > Best regards, Frans > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel >
Tom, I feel it is a good plan to resolve this problem by adding http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded/commit/?id=262f9eb0f046cd77d041a9dcb055700c5ab6601bto the maintenance branch This makes things buildable again. As you are the commiter of the above patch, I feel you are in a better position than me to judge this is ok. However with the patch at least the angstrom people get the problem resolved (minimal uses 2.21 and requries a different patch) Best regards, Frans. 2011/12/31 Adriano Pallavicino <adrianopallavicino@gmail.com> > I can correctly download it from here > ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils/binutils-2.20.1.tar.bz2 (as indicated > inside > bb file). The problem is only in sha256 and md5 sum. I'm using > 2011.03-maintenance. I can desume that this branch is only for maintaining > 2011.03 release. If someone decided to use binutils 2.20.1 why should I > introduce the new 2.20.1a from master? All the things are tested with > 2.20.1 and imho the branch 2011.03-maintenance must continue to utilize > them. > Of course, if maintainers consider this patch useless, I'll remove it from > here. > > 2011/12/31 Frans Meulenbroeks <fransmeulenbroeks@gmail.com> > > > 2011/12/31 Adriano Pallavicino <adrianopallavicino@gmail.com> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Adriano Pallavicino <adriano.pallavicino@gmail.com> > > > > > > Fixed md5sum and sha256sum > > > --- > > > recipes/binutils/binutils_2.20.1.bb | 4 ++-- > > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/recipes/binutils/binutils_2.20.1.bb b/recipes/binutils/ > > > binutils_2.20.1.bb > > > index 5154e2d..f40b676 100644 > > > --- a/recipes/binutils/binutils_2.20.1.bb > > > +++ b/recipes/binutils/binutils_2.20.1.bb > > > @@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ SRC_URI_append_nios2 =" \ > > > file://binutils-nios2.patch \ > > > " > > > > > > -SRC_URI[tarball.sha256sum] = > > > "228b84722d87e88e7fdd36869e590e649ab523a0800a7d53df906498afe6f6f8" > > > -SRC_URI[tarball.md5sum] = "9cdfb9d6ec0578c166d3beae5e15c4e5" > > > +SRC_URI[tarball.sha256sum] = > > > "71d37c96451333c5c0b84b170169fdcb138bbb27397dc06281905d9717c8ed64" > > > +SRC_URI[tarball.md5sum] = "2b9dc8f2b7dbd5ec5992c6e29de0b764" > > > > > > # powerpc patches > > > SRC_URI += "\ > > > -- > > > 1.7.4.1 > > > > > > > As told on IRC, I'd suggest to compare against the version in master. > > THere the issue was fixed using this patch: > > > > > http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded/commit/recipes/binutils/binutils_2.20.1.bb?id=262f9eb0f046cd77d041a9dcb055700c5ab6601b > > > > Note that this also patches SRC_URI. > > Guess the patch above should also go into master. > > > > Did you by any chance download your binutils tarball manually? > > > > Best regards, Frans > > _______________________________________________ > > Openembedded-devel mailing list > > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > > > > > > -- > Adriano Pallavicino > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel >
Dear Adriano, Am Samstag, den 31.12.2011, 15:25 +0100 schrieb Adriano Pallavicino: > I can correctly download it from here > ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils/binutils-2.20.1.tar.bz2 (as indicated inside > bb file). The problem is only in sha256 and md5 sum. I'm using > 2011.03-maintenance. I can desume that this branch is only for maintaining > 2011.03 release. If someone decided to use binutils 2.20.1 why should I > introduce the new 2.20.1a from master? All the things are tested with > 2.20.1 and imho the branch 2011.03-maintenance must continue to utilize > them. please read the commit messages and the included links in the commit messages for `binutils` in OpenEmbedded master branch. The link you posted is [1] is just a symlink to 2.20.1a [2]. Try it out with `wget`. The problem as mentioned in some commit messages was that some source files were not included in 2.20.1 and therefore upstream had to update that. > Of course, if maintainers consider this patch useless, I'll remove it from > here. Thanks, Paul [1] ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils/binutils-2.20.1.tar.bz2 [2] ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils/binutils-2.20.1a.tar.bz2
Patch
diff --git a/recipes/binutils/binutils_2.20.1.bb b/recipes/binutils/binutils_2.20.1.bb index 5154e2d..f40b676 100644 --- a/recipes/binutils/binutils_2.20.1.bb +++ b/recipes/binutils/binutils_2.20.1.bb @@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ SRC_URI_append_nios2 =" \ file://binutils-nios2.patch \ " -SRC_URI[tarball.sha256sum] = "228b84722d87e88e7fdd36869e590e649ab523a0800a7d53df906498afe6f6f8" -SRC_URI[tarball.md5sum] = "9cdfb9d6ec0578c166d3beae5e15c4e5" +SRC_URI[tarball.sha256sum] = "71d37c96451333c5c0b84b170169fdcb138bbb27397dc06281905d9717c8ed64" +SRC_URI[tarball.md5sum] = "2b9dc8f2b7dbd5ec5992c6e29de0b764" # powerpc patches SRC_URI += "\
Signed-off-by: Adriano Pallavicino <adriano.pallavicino@gmail.com> Fixed md5sum and sha256sum --- recipes/binutils/binutils_2.20.1.bb | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)