| Submitter | Joshua Lock |
|---|---|
| Date | Dec. 2, 2011, 7:20 p.m. |
| Message ID | <cover.1322853315.git.josh@linux.intel.com> |
| Download | mbox |
| Permalink | /patch/16119/ |
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
Pull-request
git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib josh/checksumsComments
On 02/12/11 11:20, Joshua Lock wrote: > NOTE: this requires a patch I sent to the BitBake list[1] to error cleanly, > otherwise you'll see a Python backtrace and the build fail... This patch has now been merged into BitBake master. Cheers, Joshua
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 11:20 -0800, Joshua Lock wrote: > NOTE: this requires a patch I sent to the BitBake list[1] to error cleanly, > otherwise you'll see a Python backtrace and the build fail... > > Per some discussion on the list recently this patch sets BB_STRICT_CHECKSUM > in the default-distrovars.inc so that missing checksums in recipes raises an > error. > > Cheers, > Joshua What's the state of master? If I merge this, how badly do things explode? Cheers, Richard
On 05/12/11 14:50, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 11:20 -0800, Joshua Lock wrote: >> NOTE: this requires a patch I sent to the BitBake list[1] to error cleanly, >> otherwise you'll see a Python backtrace and the build fail... >> >> Per some discussion on the list recently this patch sets BB_STRICT_CHECKSUM >> in the default-distrovars.inc so that missing checksums in recipes raises an >> error. >> >> Cheers, >> Joshua > > What's the state of master? If I merge this, how badly do things > explode? Let me run a universe fetchall and get back to you... Joshua
On 05/12/11 14:55, Joshua Lock wrote: > On 05/12/11 14:50, Richard Purdie wrote: >> On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 11:20 -0800, Joshua Lock wrote: >>> NOTE: this requires a patch I sent to the BitBake list[1] to error cleanly, >>> otherwise you'll see a Python backtrace and the build fail... >>> >>> Per some discussion on the list recently this patch sets BB_STRICT_CHECKSUM >>> in the default-distrovars.inc so that missing checksums in recipes raises an >>> error. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Joshua >> >> What's the state of master? If I merge this, how badly do things >> explode? > > Let me run a universe fetchall and get back to you... Two recipes in oe-core require checksums adding, puzzles and omap3-sgx-modules - a v2 of this request with those patches is incoming. Joshua
Op 6 dec. 2011, om 03:13 heeft Joshua Lock het volgende geschreven: > > > On 05/12/11 14:55, Joshua Lock wrote: >> On 05/12/11 14:50, Richard Purdie wrote: >>> On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 11:20 -0800, Joshua Lock wrote: >>>> NOTE: this requires a patch I sent to the BitBake list[1] to error cleanly, >>>> otherwise you'll see a Python backtrace and the build fail... >>>> >>>> Per some discussion on the list recently this patch sets BB_STRICT_CHECKSUM >>>> in the default-distrovars.inc so that missing checksums in recipes raises an >>>> error. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Joshua >>> >>> What's the state of master? If I merge this, how badly do things >>> explode? >> >> Let me run a universe fetchall and get back to you... > > Two recipes in oe-core require checksums adding, puzzles and > omap3-sgx-modules - a v2 of this request with those patches is incoming. Omap3-sgx-modules has no place in OE-core, so it should get deleted. regards, KOen
On Tuesday 06 December 2011 08:18:30 Koen Kooi wrote:
> Omap3-sgx-modules has no place in OE-core, so it should get deleted.
Sounds good, would you mind sending a patch that does that?
Cheers,
Paul