Comments
Patch
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ FILES_${PN} = "\
${prefix}/${TARGET_SYS}/lib/* \
${prefix}/${TARGET_SYS}/usr/include/* \
"
+INSANE_SKIP_${PN} += "dev-so"
+
FILES_${PN}-doc = "\
${infodir} \
${mandir} \
@@ -40,6 +42,8 @@ do_install () {
# We use libiberty from binutils
rm -f ${D}${prefix}/${TARGET_SYS}/lib/libiberty.a
+ # Not sure where the strange paths come from
+ rm -f ${D}${libdir}/../lib/libiberty.a
rm -f ${D}${libdir}/libiberty.a
# Insert symlinks into libexec so when tools without a prefix are searched for, the correct ones are
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ FILES_${PN} = "\
${gcclibdir}/${TARGET_SYS}/${BINV}/include \
${gcclibdir}/${TARGET_SYS}/${BINV}/include-fixed \
"
+INSANE_SKIP_${PN} += "dev-so"
+
FILES_${PN}-dbg += "\
${libexecdir}/gcc/${TARGET_SYS}/${BINV}/.debug/ \
"
a) There is a QA warning from a .so being present in a main package. In the case of the plugin library for gcc, this is allowed. b) Remove the unwanted libiberty.a file with the strange path. We don't need/want this and this removes an unpackaged file warning. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> ---